Kamin-Friedman Shelly, Davidovitch Nadav, Levine Hagai, Nitzan Dorit
The School of Public Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Mar 13;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00676-6.
The 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024 agreed on several key amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005), which are set to enhance global public health preparedness and response mechanisms. These amendments are part of a broader effort to integrate the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, seeking to create a more globally interconnected and rapid global response mechanism for future health crises, including a new Pandemic Agreement.
Globally and in Israel, some voice their concern that the IHR amendments and the Pandemic Agreement could undermine a nation's sovereign right to manage its public health response, infringe on national autonomy, or impose obligations such as sharing resources like diagnostics, medicines, technology, or vaccines, which could be seen as detrimental to national interests. This manuscript describes the IHR amendments and the ongoing work on the Pandemic Agreement. It explains how the documents do not undermine national sovereignty and highlights the moral and utilitarian justifications for Israeli support of these global legal documents. From a moral perspective, Israel should be committed to promoting the value of global public health and universal health coverage at both the international and regional levels. From a utilitarian perspective, provisions ensuring access to products and information will assist Israel in preparing for and protecting against health threats originating in neighboring countries and globally. Moreover, asking countries to be better ready may promote awareness and actions of public health services in Israel, which has long suffered from budgetary and health workforce constraints.
Israel must work to promote the endorsement of the Pandemic Agreement and the IHR amendments, as they are essential documents for addressing public health threats without compromising national sovereignty.
2024年5月举行的第77届世界卫生大会就《国际卫生条例》(2005年)的几项关键修正案达成一致,这些修正案旨在加强全球公共卫生防范和应对机制。这些修正案是更广泛努力的一部分,该努力整合了从新冠疫情中吸取的经验教训,旨在为未来的卫生危机建立一个更具全球互联性和快速响应的全球机制,包括一项新的大流行协议。
在全球范围内以及在以色列,一些人表达了他们的担忧,即《国际卫生条例》修正案和大流行协议可能会损害一个国家管理其公共卫生应对措施的主权权利,侵犯国家自主权,或强加诸如共享诊断、药品、技术或疫苗等资源的义务,这可能被视为有损国家利益。本手稿描述了《国际卫生条例》修正案以及大流行协议的当前工作。它解释了这些文件如何不会损害国家主权,并强调了以色列支持这些全球法律文件的道德和功利主义理由。从道德角度来看,以色列应致力于在国际和地区层面促进全球公共卫生价值和全民健康覆盖。从功利主义角度来看,确保获取产品和信息的条款将有助于以色列防范源自邻国和全球的健康威胁。此外,要求各国做好更充分准备可能会提高以色列公共卫生服务的意识并促使其采取行动,以色列长期以来一直受到预算和卫生人力方面的限制。
以色列必须努力推动对大流行协议和《国际卫生条例》修正案的认可,因为它们是在不损害国家主权的情况下应对公共卫生威胁的重要文件。