• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
IHR amendments and the "pandemic agreement" an Israeli perspective.《国际卫生条例》修正案与“大流行协定”:以色列视角
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Mar 13;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00676-6.
2
How the IHR (2005) Shaped the COVID-19 Pandemic Response in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: What Went Well and What Did Not.《国际卫生条例(2005)》如何塑造东地中海区域对新冠疫情的应对:哪些方面进展顺利,哪些方面存在不足
Health Secur. 2024 Nov-Dec;22(6):437-444. doi: 10.1089/hs.2024.0011. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
3
How an outbreak became a pandemic: a chronological analysis of crucial junctures and international obligations in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic.疫情如何演变成大流行:对 COVID-19 大流行早期几个关键节点和国际义务的时间顺序分析。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2109-2124. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01897-3. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
4
The 2024 Amendments to the International Health Regulations: A New Era for Global Health Law in Pandemic Preparedness and Response?《国际卫生条例(2024年)修正案:大流行防范与应对中全球卫生法的新时代?》
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):47-50. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.16. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
5
Strengthening the International Health Regulations: lessons from the H1N1 pandemic.加强国际卫生条例:从 H1N1 大流行中吸取的教训。
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Nov;25(6):505-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq026. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
6
Regional cooperation on pandemic preparedness and vaccine equity from an economic, regulatory and legal perspective.从经济、监管和法律角度看大流行防范与疫苗公平方面的区域合作。
Vaccine. 2025 Apr 19;53:127107. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127107. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
7
How Did Human Rights Fare in Amendments to the International Health Regulations?人权在《国际卫生条例》修订案中的情况如何?
J Law Med Ethics. 2024;52(4):907-921. doi: 10.1017/jme.2024.172. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
8
Latest revisions to the International Health Regulations will fail to prevent future travel chaos.《国际卫生条例》的最新修订将无法防止未来的旅行混乱。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jan 29;10(1):e017077. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017077.
9
A pandemic treaty, revised international health regulations, or both?制定大流行条约,修订《国际卫生条例》,还是两者都要?
Global Health. 2021 Nov 6;17(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00779-0.
10
The amended international health regulations: Implications and challenges for domestic legal frameworks.修订后的《国际卫生条例》:对国内法律框架的影响与挑战
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 Jan;40(1):234-240. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3853. Epub 2024 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of WHO versus national COVID-19 therapeutic guidelines across the world: not exactly a perfect match.世界卫生组织与各国 COVID-19 治疗指南比较:并非完全匹配。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Apr 22;9(4):e014188. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014188.
2
River water pollution in Lebanon: the country's most underestimated public health challenge.黎巴嫩的河水污染:该国最被低估的公共卫生挑战。
East Mediterr Health J. 2024 Feb 25;30(2):136-144. doi: 10.26719/emhj.24.029.
3
The Pandemic Treaty: shameful and unjust.《大流行条约》:可耻且不公正。
Lancet. 2024 Mar 2;403(10429):781. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00410-0.
4
Equity in the Pandemic Treaty: Access and Benefit-Sharing as a Policy Device or a Rhetorical Device?大流行条约中的公平性:获取与惠益分享是政策工具还是修辞工具?
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(1):217-220. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.59. Epub 2023 May 25.
5
Independent monitoring for the pandemic accord: a non-negotiable provision.对大流行协议的独立监测:一项不可谈判的条款。
Lancet. 2023 Feb 18;401(10376):553. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00126-5. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
6
An effective pandemic treaty requires accountability.一项有效的大流行条约需要问责制。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Sep;7(9):e730-e731. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00192-X. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
7
A pandemic treaty, revised international health regulations, or both?制定大流行条约,修订《国际卫生条例》,还是两者都要?
Global Health. 2021 Nov 6;17(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00779-0.
8
Regional lessons from the COVID-19 outbreak in the Middle East: From infectious diseases to climate change adaptation.从中东地区 COVID-19 疫情中吸取的区域教训:从传染病到适应气候变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 10;768:144434. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144434. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
9
Reimagining Global Health Governance in the Age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代对全球卫生治理的重塑
Am J Public Health. 2020 Nov;110(11):1615-1619. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305933.
10
A comparison of health indicators and social determinants of health between Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories.以色列与巴勒斯坦被占领土的健康指标和健康社会决定因素比较。
Glob Public Health. 2021 Mar;16(3):431-447. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1808037. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

《国际卫生条例》修正案与“大流行协定”:以色列视角

IHR amendments and the "pandemic agreement" an Israeli perspective.

作者信息

Kamin-Friedman Shelly, Davidovitch Nadav, Levine Hagai, Nitzan Dorit

机构信息

The School of Public Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Mar 13;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00676-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13584-025-00676-6
PMID:40083009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11905496/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024 agreed on several key amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005), which are set to enhance global public health preparedness and response mechanisms. These amendments are part of a broader effort to integrate the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, seeking to create a more globally interconnected and rapid global response mechanism for future health crises, including a new Pandemic Agreement.

MAIN BODY

Globally and in Israel, some voice their concern that the IHR amendments and the Pandemic Agreement could undermine a nation's sovereign right to manage its public health response, infringe on national autonomy, or impose obligations such as sharing resources like diagnostics, medicines, technology, or vaccines, which could be seen as detrimental to national interests. This manuscript describes the IHR amendments and the ongoing work on the Pandemic Agreement. It explains how the documents do not undermine national sovereignty and highlights the moral and utilitarian justifications for Israeli support of these global legal documents. From a moral perspective, Israel should be committed to promoting the value of global public health and universal health coverage at both the international and regional levels. From a utilitarian perspective, provisions ensuring access to products and information will assist Israel in preparing for and protecting against health threats originating in neighboring countries and globally. Moreover, asking countries to be better ready may promote awareness and actions of public health services in Israel, which has long suffered from budgetary and health workforce constraints.

CONCLUSION

Israel must work to promote the endorsement of the Pandemic Agreement and the IHR amendments, as they are essential documents for addressing public health threats without compromising national sovereignty.

摘要

背景

2024年5月举行的第77届世界卫生大会就《国际卫生条例》(2005年)的几项关键修正案达成一致,这些修正案旨在加强全球公共卫生防范和应对机制。这些修正案是更广泛努力的一部分,该努力整合了从新冠疫情中吸取的经验教训,旨在为未来的卫生危机建立一个更具全球互联性和快速响应的全球机制,包括一项新的大流行协议。

正文

在全球范围内以及在以色列,一些人表达了他们的担忧,即《国际卫生条例》修正案和大流行协议可能会损害一个国家管理其公共卫生应对措施的主权权利,侵犯国家自主权,或强加诸如共享诊断、药品、技术或疫苗等资源的义务,这可能被视为有损国家利益。本手稿描述了《国际卫生条例》修正案以及大流行协议的当前工作。它解释了这些文件如何不会损害国家主权,并强调了以色列支持这些全球法律文件的道德和功利主义理由。从道德角度来看,以色列应致力于在国际和地区层面促进全球公共卫生价值和全民健康覆盖。从功利主义角度来看,确保获取产品和信息的条款将有助于以色列防范源自邻国和全球的健康威胁。此外,要求各国做好更充分准备可能会提高以色列公共卫生服务的意识并促使其采取行动,以色列长期以来一直受到预算和卫生人力方面的限制。

结论

以色列必须努力推动对大流行协议和《国际卫生条例》修正案的认可,因为它们是在不损害国家主权的情况下应对公共卫生威胁的重要文件。