Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China.
Int J Surg. 2024 Aug 1;110(8):4830-4838. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001468.
BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remain controversial. METHODS: Patients with LAGC who received either nICT or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) at 3 tertiary referral teaching hospitals in China between January 2016 and October 2022 were analyzed. After propensity-score matching (PSM), comparing the radiological response, pathological response rate, perioperative outcomes, and early recurrence between the two groups. RESULTS: After PSM, 585 patients were included, with 195 and 390 patients comprising the nICT and nCT groups, respectively. The nICT group exhibited a higher objective response rate (79.5% vs. 59.0%; P <0.001), pathological complete response rate (14.36% vs. 6.41%; P =0.002) and major pathological response rate (39.49% vs. 26.15%; P =0.001) compared with the nCT group. The incidence of surgical complications (17.44% vs. 16.15%, P =0.694) and the proportion of perioperative textbook outcomes (80.0% vs. 81.0%; P =0.767) were similar in both groups. The nICT group had a significantly lower proportion of early recurrence than the nCT group (29.7% vs. 40.8%; P =0.047). Furthermore, the multivariable logistic analysis revealed that immunotherapy was an independent protective factor against early recurrence [odds ratio 0.62 (95% CI 0.41-0.92); P =0.018]. No significant difference was found in neoadjuvant therapy drug toxicity between the two groups (51.79% vs. 45.38%; P =0.143). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nCT, nICT is safe and effective, which significantly enhanced objective and pathological response rates and reduced the risk for early recurrence among patients with LAGC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov.
背景:新辅助免疫化疗(nICT)治疗局部进展期胃癌(LAGC)的安全性和有效性仍存在争议。
方法:分析了 2016 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月在中国 3 家三级转诊教学医院接受 nICT 或新辅助化疗(nCT)的 LAGC 患者。经过倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,比较两组患者的影像学反应、病理缓解率、围手术期结局和早期复发情况。
结果:PSM 后,共纳入 585 例患者,其中 nICT 组和 nCT 组各 195 例和 390 例。nICT 组客观缓解率(79.5% vs. 59.0%;P <0.001)、病理完全缓解率(14.36% vs. 6.41%;P =0.002)和主要病理缓解率(39.49% vs. 26.15%;P =0.001)均高于 nCT 组。两组患者的手术并发症发生率(17.44% vs. 16.15%,P =0.694)和围手术期达到标准结局的比例(80.0% vs. 81.0%;P =0.767)相似。nICT 组早期复发率明显低于 nCT 组(29.7% vs. 40.8%;P =0.047)。此外,多变量逻辑分析显示,免疫治疗是早期复发的独立保护因素[比值比 0.62(95%可信区间 0.41-0.92);P =0.018]。两组患者新辅助治疗药物毒性无显著差异(51.79% vs. 45.38%;P =0.143)。
结论:与 nCT 相比,nICT 安全有效,可显著提高 LAGC 患者的客观缓解率和病理缓解率,降低早期复发风险。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024-5-17
World J Surg Oncol. 2025-6-20
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025-6-27
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024-9-5
J Clin Oncol. 2023-3-1
N Engl J Med. 2022-5-26