Coop Amy, Clark Amelia, Morgan John, Reid Fiona, Lacey J Hubert
Schoen Clinic Newbridge, Birmingham, UK.
Schoen Clinic Chelsea, London, UK.
Eat Weight Disord. 2024 Apr 23;29(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s40519-024-01656-6.
The SCOFF questionnaire was designed as a simple, memorable screening tool to raise suspicion that a person might have an eating disorder. It is over 20 years since the creation of the SCOFF, during which time it has been widely used. Considering this, we wish to review the use of the SCOFF in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and to assess whether it is being used appropriately in the manner in which it was originally devised and tested.
The Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and all search strategies and methods were determined before the onset of the study. PubMed and Wiley Online Library were searched using the terms SCOFF and eating. Two reviewers were involved in the reviewing process. Criteria for appropriate use of the SCOFF were formalised with the tool's original authors.
180 articles were included in the final review. 48 articles had used the SCOFF appropriately, 117 articles inappropriately and 15 articles had been mixed in the appropriateness of their use.
This systematic review highlights the inappropriate use of the SCOFF in diverse languages and settings. When used correctly the SCOFF has made a significant contribution to the understanding of eating disorders and its simplicity has been applauded and led to widespread use. However in over two-thirds of studies, the use of the SCOFF was inappropriate and the paper highlights how and in what way it was misused, Guidelines for the appropriate use of the SCOFF are stated. Future validation and avenues of research are suggested.
Level I.
SCOFF问卷被设计为一种简单易记的筛查工具,用于提高对某人可能患有饮食失调症的怀疑。自SCOFF创建以来已有20多年,在此期间它得到了广泛应用。考虑到这一点,我们希望回顾SCOFF在同行评审科学期刊中的使用情况,并评估其是否按照最初设计和测试的方式得到恰当使用。
遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,所有搜索策略和方法在研究开始前确定。使用“SCOFF”和“饮食”等术语在PubMed和Wiley在线图书馆进行搜索。两名评审员参与评审过程。与该工具的原作者一起确定了SCOFF恰当使用的标准。
最终评审纳入了180篇文章。48篇文章恰当使用了SCOFF,117篇文章使用不当,15篇文章的使用恰当性参差不齐。
这项系统评价突出了SCOFF在不同语言和环境中的不当使用情况。正确使用时,SCOFF对饮食失调症的理解做出了重大贡献,其简单性受到称赞并导致广泛应用。然而,在超过三分之二的研究中,SCOFF的使用是不恰当的,本文强调了其被误用的方式和方面,并说明了SCOFF恰当使用的指南。还提出了未来验证和研究途径。
一级。