• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算认知科学:模拟与数字。

Computation for cognitive science: Analog versus digital.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2024 Jul-Aug;15(4):e1679. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1679. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1002/wcs.1679
PMID:38655784
Abstract

Cognitive science was founded on the idea that the mind/brain can be understood in computational terms. While computational modeling in science is ubiquitous, cognitive science takes the stronger stance that the mind/brain literally performs computations. Moreover, performing computations is crucial to explaining what the mind/brain does, qua mind/brain. Unfortunately, most scientists fail to consider analog computation as a legitimate and theoretically useful type of computation in addition to digital computation; to the extent that analog computation is acknowledged, it is mostly based on a simplistic and incomplete understanding. Taking computation to consist of only one type (i.e., digital) while ignoring another, interestingly distinct type (i.e., analog) leads to an impoverished understanding of what it could mean for minds/brains to compute. A full appreciation and understanding of analog computation-particularly in relation to digital computation-allows researchers to develop computational frameworks and hypotheses in new and exciting ways. Thus, somewhat counterintuitively, looking to the once-dominant computing paradigm of yesteryear can provide novel computational ways of thinking about the mind and brain. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science.

摘要

认知科学建立在这样一种理念之上,即心智/大脑可以用计算术语来理解。虽然科学中的计算建模无处不在,但认知科学更加强调心智/大脑实际上执行计算。此外,执行计算对于解释心智/大脑作为心智/大脑所做的事情至关重要。不幸的是,大多数科学家未能将模拟计算视为除数字计算之外另一种合法且具有理论意义的计算类型;在承认模拟计算的程度上,它主要基于一种简单和不完整的理解。将计算仅局限于一种类型(即数字)而忽略另一种有趣而独特的类型(即模拟),会导致对心智/大脑进行计算的含义的理解变得匮乏。全面理解和欣赏模拟计算——特别是与数字计算的关系——可以使研究人员以新的和令人兴奋的方式开发计算框架和假设。因此,有些出人意料的是,回顾过去占主导地位的计算范式,可以为思考心智和大脑提供新颖的计算方式。本文归入以下类别:哲学 > 认知科学基础。

相似文献

1
Computation for cognitive science: Analog versus digital.计算认知科学:模拟与数字。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2024 Jul-Aug;15(4):e1679. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1679. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
2
The role of representation in computation.表示在计算中的作用。
Cogn Process. 2009 Feb;10(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s10339-008-0227-x. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
3
Explaining how the mind works: on the relation between cognitive science and philosophy.解释心智如何运作:论认知科学与哲学的关系。
Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;3(2):399-424. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01142.x.
4
Bayesian modeling of the mind: From norms to neurons.贝叶斯思维建模:从规范到神经元。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;12(1):e1540. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1540. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
5
Metaphilosophy of Mind: how Do Minds Investigate Minds? Refutation of the Theocentric View.心灵元哲学:心灵如何探究心灵?对以神为中心观点的驳斥。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2017 Mar;51(1):120-140. doi: 10.1007/s12124-016-9362-6.
6
The computational power of the human brain.人类大脑的计算能力。
Front Cell Neurosci. 2023 Aug 7;17:1220030. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1220030. eCollection 2023.
7
Constructing a philosophy of science of cognitive science.构建认知科学的科学哲学
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;1(3):548-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01039.x.
8
Scalable hybrid computation with spikes.具有脉冲的可扩展混合计算。
Neural Comput. 2002 Sep;14(9):2003-38. doi: 10.1162/089976602320263971.
9
Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines.计算理性:大脑、心智和机器智能的趋同范式。
Science. 2015 Jul 17;349(6245):273-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aac6076. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
10
The computational stance in biology.生物学中的计算立场。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Jun 10;374(1774):20180380. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0380.