Suppr超能文献

日常生活认知量表(CDL)的编制与内容效度

Development and content validity of the cognition in daily life scale (CDL).

作者信息

Domensino Anne-Fleur, Aarts Elyan, Visser-Meily Johanna M A, Spikman Jacoba M, van Heugten Caroline

机构信息

School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2025 Mar;35(2):382-407. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2024.2343149. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

Abstract

Cognitive impairment can negatively influence daily functioning. Current cognitive measures are essential for diagnosing cognitive impairment, but findings on these tests do not always represent the level of cognitive functioning in daily life. Therefore, this study aimed to design a structured measurement instrument to observe and rate the impact of cognitive impairment in daily life, named the (CDL). In this paper we describe the development, expected usability, and psychometric properties (content and face validity) of the instrument. The CDL was established through three consecutive development phases: (1) item selection, (2) item categorization and comparison, and (3) item revision and manual construction. Subsequently, a panel of eleven international experts rated the relevance of the selected items and provided comments on the expected usability and face validity. Content validity was estimated with the content validity index, based on which four items were removed. The experts' comments led to minor adjustments of the manual, domains, and formulation of the maintained items. The final instrument consists of 65 items describing behaviour that relies on cognitive functions within six domains. Future research should focus on evaluating the construct validity and reliability of the CDL.

摘要

认知障碍会对日常功能产生负面影响。当前的认知测量方法对于诊断认知障碍至关重要,但这些测试的结果并不总是能代表日常生活中的认知功能水平。因此,本研究旨在设计一种结构化测量工具,以观察和评估认知障碍对日常生活的影响,即认知障碍日常生活能力量表(CDL)。在本文中,我们描述了该工具的开发过程、预期可用性以及心理测量特性(内容效度和表面效度)。CDL是通过三个连续的开发阶段建立的:(1)项目选择,(2)项目分类与比较,以及(3)项目修订与手册编制。随后,由11名国际专家组成的小组对所选项目的相关性进行了评估,并就预期可用性和表面效度提供了意见。通过内容效度指数评估内容效度,据此删除了四个项目。专家的意见导致对手册、领域以及保留项目的表述进行了微调。最终工具由65个项目组成,描述了六个领域中依赖认知功能的行为。未来的研究应侧重于评估CDL的结构效度和信度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca60/11854039/00521830d173/PNRH_A_2343149_F0001_OB.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验