Suppr超能文献

日常生活工具性活动能力:代偿量表的编制与心理测量学特性

Development and psychometric properties of the instrumental activities of daily living: compensation scale.

作者信息

Schmitter-Edgecombe Maureen, Parsey Carolyn, Lamb Richard

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014 Dec;29(8):776-92. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acu053. Epub 2014 Oct 25.

Abstract

The Instrumental Activities of Daily Living - Compensation (IADL-C) scale was developed to capture early functional difficulties and to quantify compensatory strategy use that may mitigate functional decline in the aging population. The IADL-C was validated in a sample of cognitively healthy older adults (N=184) and individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; N=92) and dementia (N=24). Factor analysis and Rasch item analysis led to the 27-item IADL-C informant questionnaire with four functional domain subscales (money and self-management, home daily living, travel and event memory, and social skills). The subscales demonstrated good internal consistency (Rasch reliability 0.80 to 0.93) and test-retest reliability (Spearman coefficients 0.70 to 0.91). The IADL-C total score and subscales showed convergent validity with other IADL measures, discriminant validity with psychosocial measures, and the ability to discriminate between diagnostic groups. The money and self management subscale showed notable difficulties for individuals with MCI, whereas difficulties with home daily living became more prominent for dementia participants. Compensatory strategy use increased in the MCI group and decreased in the dementia group.

摘要

日常生活工具性活动 - 补偿(IADL-C)量表的开发旨在捕捉早期功能困难,并量化可能减轻老年人群功能衰退的补偿策略使用情况。IADL-C在认知健康的老年人样本(N = 184)、轻度认知障碍(MCI;N = 92)和痴呆症患者样本(N = 24)中进行了验证。因子分析和Rasch项目分析得出了包含27个条目的IADL-C信息提供者问卷,该问卷有四个功能领域子量表(金钱与自我管理、家庭日常生活、出行与事件记忆以及社交技能)。这些子量表显示出良好的内部一致性(Rasch信度为0.80至0.93)和重测信度(斯皮尔曼系数为0.70至0.91)。IADL-C总分及子量表与其他IADL测量方法具有收敛效度,与心理社会测量方法具有区分效度,并且能够区分不同诊断组。金钱与自我管理子量表显示MCI患者存在显著困难,而家庭日常生活方面的困难在痴呆症参与者中更为突出。MCI组的补偿策略使用增加,而痴呆症组则减少。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验