Reed J Michael, Wolfe Benjamin E, Romero L Michael
Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford 02155, MA, USA.
iScience. 2024 Apr 10;27(5):109478. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109478. eCollection 2024 May 17.
There is increasing interest in applying resilience concepts at different scales of biological organization to address major interdisciplinary challenges from cancer to climate change. It is unclear, however, whether resilience can be a unifying concept consistently applied across the breadth of the biological sciences, or whether there is limited capacity for integration. In this review, we draw on literature from molecular biology to community ecology to ascertain commonalities and shortcomings in how resilience is measured and interpreted. Resilience is studied at all levels of biological organization, although the term is often not used. There is a suite of resilience mechanisms conserved across biological scales, and there are tradeoffs that affect resilience. Resilience is conceptually useful to help diverse researchers think about how biological systems respond to perturbations, but we need a richer lexicon to describe the diversity of perturbations, and we lack widely applicable metrics of resilience.
将恢复力概念应用于不同生物组织尺度以应对从癌症到气候变化等重大跨学科挑战的兴趣与日俱增。然而,尚不清楚恢复力是否能成为一个可在整个生物科学领域持续应用的统一概念,或者其整合能力是否有限。在本综述中,我们借鉴从分子生物学到群落生态学的文献,以确定在恢复力的测量和解释方面的共性与不足。尽管恢复力这个术语常不被使用,但在生物组织的各个层面都有对其进行研究。有一系列在生物尺度上保守的恢复力机制,并且存在影响恢复力的权衡。恢复力在概念上有助于帮助不同领域的研究人员思考生物系统如何应对扰动,但我们需要更丰富的词汇来描述扰动的多样性,并且我们缺乏广泛适用的恢复力指标。