• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用新型地面振动监测系统对家庭身体活动进行客观评估:与可穿戴活动追踪器和间接量热法测量的验证及比较

Objective Assessment of Physical Activity at Home Using a Novel Floor-Vibration Monitoring System: Validation and Comparison With Wearable Activity Trackers and Indirect Calorimetry Measurements.

作者信息

Nakajima Yuki, Kitayama Asami, Ohta Yuji, Motooka Nobuhisa, Kuno-Mizumura Mayumi, Miyachi Motohiko, Tanaka Shigeho, Ishikawa-Takata Kazuko, Tripette Julien

机构信息

Department of Human-Environmental Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Bunkyo, Japan.

Department of Performing Arts, Ochanomizu University, Bunkyo, Japan.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 25;8:e51874. doi: 10.2196/51874.

DOI:10.2196/51874
PMID:38662415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11082727/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The self-monitoring of physical activity is an effective strategy for promoting active lifestyles. However, accurately assessing physical activity remains challenging in certain situations. This study evaluates a novel floor-vibration monitoring system to quantify housework-related physical activity.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the validity of step-count and physical behavior intensity predictions of a novel floor-vibration monitoring system in comparison with the actual number of steps and indirect calorimetry measurements. The accuracy of the predictions is also compared with that of research-grade devices (ActiGraph GT9X).

METHODS

The Ocha-House, located in Tokyo, serves as an independent experimental facility equipped with high-sensitivity accelerometers installed on the floor to monitor vibrations. Dedicated data processing software was developed to analyze floor-vibration signals and calculate 3 quantitative indices: floor-vibration quantity, step count, and moving distance. In total, 10 participants performed 4 different housework-related activities, wearing ActiGraph GT9X monitors on both the waist and wrist for 6 minutes each. Concurrently, floor-vibration data were collected, and the energy expenditure was measured using the Douglas bag method to determine the actual intensity of activities.

RESULTS

Significant correlations (P<.001) were found between the quantity of floor vibrations, the estimated step count, the estimated moving distance, and the actual activity intensities. The step-count parameter extracted from the floor-vibration signal emerged as the most robust predictor (r=0.82; P<.001). Multiple regression models incorporating several floor-vibration-extracted parameters showed a strong association with actual activity intensities (r=0.88; P<.001). Both the step-count and intensity predictions made by the floor-vibration monitoring system exhibited greater accuracy than those of the ActiGraph monitor.

CONCLUSIONS

Floor-vibration monitoring systems seem able to produce valid quantitative assessments of physical activity for selected housework-related activities. In the future, connected smart home systems that integrate this type of technology could be used to perform continuous and accurate evaluations of physical behaviors throughout the day.

摘要

背景

身体活动的自我监测是促进积极生活方式的有效策略。然而,在某些情况下准确评估身体活动仍然具有挑战性。本研究评估了一种新型的地面振动监测系统,以量化与家务相关的身体活动。

目的

本研究旨在评估一种新型地面振动监测系统的步数和身体行为强度预测与实际步数和间接量热法测量结果相比的有效性。还将预测的准确性与研究级设备(ActiGraph GT9X)的准确性进行比较。

方法

位于东京的Ocha-House作为一个独立的实验设施,配备了安装在地板上的高灵敏度加速度计以监测振动。开发了专用的数据处理软件来分析地面振动信号并计算三个定量指标:地面振动量、步数和移动距离。共有10名参与者进行了4种不同的与家务相关的活动,腰部和手腕都佩戴ActiGraph GT9X监测器,每次佩戴6分钟。同时,收集地面振动数据,并使用道格拉斯袋法测量能量消耗,以确定活动的实际强度。

结果

在地面振动量、估计步数、估计移动距离和实际活动强度之间发现了显著相关性(P<0.001)。从地面振动信号中提取的步数参数是最可靠的预测指标(r=0.82;P<0.001)。纳入多个从地面振动中提取的参数的多元回归模型与实际活动强度显示出很强的相关性(r=0.88;P<0.001)。地面振动监测系统进行的步数和强度预测都比ActiGraph监测器的预测更准确。

结论

地面振动监测系统似乎能够对选定的与家务相关的活动进行有效的身体活动定量评估。未来,集成这种技术的联网智能家居系统可用于全天对身体行为进行连续和准确的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/fd58b881098a/formative_v8i1e51874_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/bf01961c5606/formative_v8i1e51874_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/7dee14b81246/formative_v8i1e51874_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/81e0ab93e656/formative_v8i1e51874_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/c0486d19fa67/formative_v8i1e51874_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/fd58b881098a/formative_v8i1e51874_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/bf01961c5606/formative_v8i1e51874_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/7dee14b81246/formative_v8i1e51874_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/81e0ab93e656/formative_v8i1e51874_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/c0486d19fa67/formative_v8i1e51874_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cd/11082727/fd58b881098a/formative_v8i1e51874_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Objective Assessment of Physical Activity at Home Using a Novel Floor-Vibration Monitoring System: Validation and Comparison With Wearable Activity Trackers and Indirect Calorimetry Measurements.使用新型地面振动监测系统对家庭身体活动进行客观评估:与可穿戴活动追踪器和间接量热法测量的验证及比较
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 25;8:e51874. doi: 10.2196/51874.
2
Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.腕戴式活动追踪器在慢性疼痛患者的实验室和自由生活环境中的应用:效标效度研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 12;9(1):e24806. doi: 10.2196/24806.
3
A Mobile Health Team Challenge to Promote Stepping and Stair Climbing Activities: Exploratory Feasibility Study.移动医疗团队挑战促进踏步和爬楼梯活动:探索性可行性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 4;8(2):e12665. doi: 10.2196/12665.
4
Validation of Oura ring energy expenditure and steps in laboratory and free-living.验证 Oura 戒指的能量消耗和实验室及自由生活中的步数。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Feb 24;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01868-x.
5
Validity of the Polar M430 Activity Monitor in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study.极地M430活动监测仪在自由生活条件下的有效性:验证研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Aug 16;3(3):e14438. doi: 10.2196/14438.
6
Step-count outcomes of 13 different activity trackers: Results from laboratory and free-living experiments.13 种不同活动追踪器的计步结果:实验室和自由生活实验结果。
Gait Posture. 2022 Oct;98:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Current Knowledge about ActiGraph GT9X Link Activity Monitor Accuracy and Validity in Measuring Steps and Energy Expenditure: A Systematic Review.关于 ActiGraph GT9X Link 活动监测器测量步数和能量消耗的准确性和有效性的最新知识:系统评价。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 26;24(3):825. doi: 10.3390/s24030825.
8
Low-Cost Consumer-Based Trackers to Measure Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Among Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study.基于低成本消费者的追踪器在自由生活条件下测量成年人的身体活动和睡眠持续时间:验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 19;8(5):e16674. doi: 10.2196/16674.
9
Accuracy of 12 Wearable Devices for Estimating Physical Activity Energy Expenditure Using a Metabolic Chamber and the Doubly Labeled Water Method: Validation Study.使用代谢室和双标记水法评估 12 种可穿戴设备估算体力活动能量消耗的准确性:验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 2;7(8):e13938. doi: 10.2196/13938.
10
Reporting adherence, validity and physical activity measures of wearable activity trackers in medical research: A systematic review.在医学研究中报告可穿戴活动追踪器的依从性、有效性和身体活动测量:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104696. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104696. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Do physical activity interventions combining self-monitoring with other components provide an additional benefit compared with self-monitoring alone? A systematic review and meta-analysis.体育活动干预措施结合自我监测与其他组成部分是否比单纯自我监测更有额外益处?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;56(23):1366-1374. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105198. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Step-count outcomes of 13 different activity trackers: Results from laboratory and free-living experiments.13 种不同活动追踪器的计步结果:实验室和自由生活实验结果。
Gait Posture. 2022 Oct;98:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
3
The effects of step-count monitoring interventions on physical activity: systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based randomised controlled trials in adults.
计步监测干预对身体活动的影响:基于社区的成年人随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Oct 9;17(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01020-8.
4
The State-of-the-Art of Sensors and Environmental Monitoring Technologies in Buildings.建筑中传感器与环境监测技术的现状
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Aug 22;19(17):3648. doi: 10.3390/s19173648.
5
Accuracy of 12 Wearable Devices for Estimating Physical Activity Energy Expenditure Using a Metabolic Chamber and the Doubly Labeled Water Method: Validation Study.使用代谢室和双标记水法评估 12 种可穿戴设备估算体力活动能量消耗的准确性:验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 2;7(8):e13938. doi: 10.2196/13938.
6
Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review.可穿戴活动追踪器、准确性、采用、接受度和健康影响:系统文献回顾。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 May;93:103153. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103153. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
7
Perceived user preferences and usability evaluation of mainstream wearable devices for health monitoring.主流健康监测可穿戴设备的用户感知偏好及可用性评估。
PeerJ. 2018 Jul 25;6:e5350. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5350. eCollection 2018.
8
"What Is a Step?" Differences in How a Step Is Detected among Three Popular Activity Monitors That Have Impacted Physical Activity Research.“何为一步?”三种广受欢迎的活动监测器在检测步数方面的差异对体力活动研究产生影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Apr 15;18(4):1206. doi: 10.3390/s18041206.
9
Prediction of activity-related energy expenditure using accelerometer-derived physical activity under free-living conditions: a systematic review.在自由生活条件下使用加速度计测量的身体活动预测与活动相关的能量消耗:一项系统综述。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Aug;40(8):1187-97. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.14. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
10
Characterization of a multi-user indoor positioning system based on low cost depth vision (Kinect) for monitoring human activity in a smart home.基于低成本深度视觉(Kinect)的多用户室内定位系统用于智能家居中人类活动监测的特性分析
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:5003-7. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319515.