Suppr超能文献

用于预测排卵的快速尿液促黄体生成素检测

Rapid urinary LH assay for prediction of ovulation.

作者信息

Ho P C, Kwan M, Chan S Y, Chan P H, Tang L C

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Aug;25(3):230-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1985.tb00651.x.

Abstract

The results of the cervical mucus score (CMS), basal body temperature (BBT) and a rapid urine luteinizing hormone (LH) assay by haemagglutination immunoassay were compared with plasma LH radioimmunoassay in 28 ovulatory cycles. There was good correlation of the CMS peak with the plasma LH peak while the urine LH peak usually occurred one day later. The first day when the CMS was greater than or equal to 8 occurred within +/- 1 day of the plasma LH peak in 89.3% of cycles. The first day when the urine LH was greater than or equal to 100 iu/l occurred within +/- 1 day of the plasma LH peak in all the cycles. BBT nadir could be identified in only 82% of cycles and it coincided with the plasma LH peak in only 28.6% of cases. These findings suggest that both the CMS and the rapid urine LH assay are acceptable methods for determining the time of ovulation while the BBT is not useful.

摘要

在28个排卵周期中,将宫颈黏液评分(CMS)、基础体温(BBT)以及通过血凝免疫测定法进行的快速尿促黄体生成素(LH)检测结果与血浆LH放射免疫测定结果进行了比较。CMS峰值与血浆LH峰值具有良好的相关性,而尿LH峰值通常在一天后出现。在89.3%的周期中,CMS大于或等于8的第一天出现在血浆LH峰值的±1天内。在所有周期中,尿LH大于或等于100 iu/l的第一天出现在血浆LH峰值的±1天内。仅在82%的周期中可识别出BBT最低点,且仅在28.6%的病例中与血浆LH峰值相符。这些发现表明,CMS和快速尿LH检测都是确定排卵时间的可接受方法,而BBT则无用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验