Suppr超能文献

将人类世中的位置性、交叉性和智力置于情境中

Contextualizing Positionality, Intersectionality, and Intelligence in the Anthropocene.

作者信息

Suzuki Lisa A, Caso Taymy J, Yucel Aysegul, Asad Ahad, Kokaze Haruka

机构信息

Department of Applied Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.

Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada.

出版信息

J Intell. 2024 Apr 17;12(4):45. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12040045.

Abstract

The geological epoch of the Anthropocene has challenged traditional definitions of what intellectual abilities are necessary to creatively problem-solve, understand, and address contemporary societal and environmental crises. If we hope to make meaningful changes to how our society addresses these complex issues and pave the way for a better future for generations to come, we must advance traditional theories and measures of higher-order abilities to reflect equity and inclusion. To this end, we must address global issues by integrating the complexities of intersectional identities as they impact our understanding of what constitutes intelligence in individuals, groups, and diverse communities. This re-envisioning of intelligence presents new complexities for understanding and challenges for our field beyond the boundaries of what has been previously touted by many disciplines, including psychology. It is an opportunity to re-envision what it means to be intelligent in a diverse global context while also honoring and recognizing the value of difference, positionality, and other ways of knowing.

摘要

人类世的地质时代对传统定义提出了挑战,即创造性地解决问题、理解和应对当代社会与环境危机需要哪些智力能力。如果我们希望对社会应对这些复杂问题的方式做出有意义的改变,并为子孙后代创造更美好的未来铺平道路,我们就必须推进关于高阶能力的传统理论和衡量标准,以体现公平和包容。为此,我们必须通过整合交叉身份的复杂性来解决全球问题,因为这些身份会影响我们对个人、群体和多元社区中智力构成的理解。这种对智力的重新构想给理解带来了新的复杂性,也给我们这个领域带来了挑战,超出了包括心理学在内的许多学科此前所宣扬的范围。这是一个重新构想在多元全球背景下智慧意味着什么的机会,同时也要尊重和认可差异、位置性以及其他认知方式的价值。

相似文献

1
Contextualizing Positionality, Intersectionality, and Intelligence in the Anthropocene.
J Intell. 2024 Apr 17;12(4):45. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12040045.
2
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
3
Intersectionality Within Critical Autism Studies: A Narrative Review.
Autism Adulthood. 2022 Dec 1;4(4):281-289. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0014. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
4
5
Conservation physiology and the quest for a 'good' Anthropocene.
Conserv Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;5(1):cox003. doi: 10.1093/conphys/cox003. eCollection 2017.
6
7
Planetary health in the Anthropocene.
Health Promot Int. 2019 Mar 1;34(Supplement_1):i28-i36. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz012.
8
Intersectionality: a means for centering power and oppression in research.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Aug;27(3):863-875. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10110-0. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Modern Assessments of Intelligence Must Be Fair and Equitable.
J Intell. 2023 Jun 20;11(6):126. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060126.
4
Dismantling and eradicating anti-Blackness and systemic racism.
J Couns Psychol. 2023 Apr;70(3):235-243. doi: 10.1037/cou0000660.
5
An Expert Discussion on Structural Racism in Autism Research and Practice.
Autism Adulthood. 2020 Dec 1;2(4):273-281. doi: 10.1089/aut.2020.29015.drj. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
7
Incorporating Intersectionality in Neuropsychology: Moving the Discipline Forward.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2023 Jan 21;38(1):154-167. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acac075.
8
Addressing the climate crisis: An action plan for psychologists (summary).
Am Psychol. 2022 Oct;77(7):799-811. doi: 10.1037/amp0001041. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
9
Black, indigenous, and trainees of color stress and resilience: The role of training and education in decolonizing psychology.
Psychol Trauma. 2022 Apr;14(S1):S140-S147. doi: 10.1037/tra0001187. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验