• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于对抗幼儿网络成瘾的数字干预措施:家长和治疗师观点的定性研究

Digital Interventions for Combating Internet Addiction in Young Children: Qualitative Study of Parent and Therapist Perspectives.

作者信息

Theopilus Yansen, Al Mahmud Abdullah, Davis Hilary, Octavia Johanna Renny

机构信息

Centre for Design Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.

Centre for Ergonomics, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung, Indonesia.

出版信息

JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Apr 26;7:e55364. doi: 10.2196/55364.

DOI:10.2196/55364
PMID:38669672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11087864/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Internet addiction is an emerging mental health issue in this digital age. Nowadays, children start using the internet in early childhood, thus making them vulnerable to addictive use. Previous studies have reported that the risk of internet addiction tends to be higher in lower-income regions with lower quality of life, such as Indonesia. Indonesia has high risks and prevalence of internet addiction, including in children. Digital interventions have been developed as an option to combat internet addiction in children. However, little is known about what parents and therapists in Indonesia perceive about these types of interventions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the experiences, perceptions, and considerations of parents and therapists regarding digital interventions for combating internet addiction in young Indonesian children.

METHODS

This study used a qualitative exploratory approach through semistructured interviews. We involved 22 parents of children aged 7 to 11 years and 6 experienced internet addiction therapists for children. The interview data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants in this study recognized 3 existing digital interventions to combat internet addiction: Google Family Link, YouTube Kids, and Apple parental control. They perceived that digital interventions could be beneficial in continuously promoting healthy digital behavior in children and supporting parents in supervision. However, the existing interventions were not highly used due to limitations such as the apps' functionality and usability, parental capability, parent-child relationships, cultural incompatibility, and data privacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that digital interventions should focus not only on restricting and monitoring screen time but also on suggesting substitutive activities for children, developing children's competencies to combat addictive behavior, improving digital literacy in children and parents, and supporting parental decision-making to promote healthy digital behavior in their children. Suggestions for future digital interventions are provided, such as making the existing features more usable and relatable, investigating gamification features to enhance parental motivation and capability in managing their children's internet use, providing tailored or personalized content to suit users' characteristics, and considering the provision of training and information about the use of interventions and privacy agreements.

摘要

背景

在这个数字时代,网络成瘾是一个新出现的心理健康问题。如今,儿童在幼儿期就开始使用互联网,这使他们容易沉迷其中。先前的研究报告称,在生活质量较低的低收入地区,如印度尼西亚,网络成瘾的风险往往更高。印度尼西亚网络成瘾的风险和患病率都很高,儿童群体也不例外。数字干预措施已被开发出来,作为解决儿童网络成瘾问题的一种选择。然而,对于印度尼西亚的家长和治疗师对这类干预措施的看法,我们却知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在调查印度尼西亚幼儿家长和治疗师对于对抗网络成瘾的数字干预措施的体验、看法和考量。

方法

本研究采用定性探索性方法,通过半结构化访谈进行。我们纳入了22名7至11岁儿童的家长以及6名经验丰富的儿童网络成瘾治疗师。访谈数据经转录后,采用主题分析法进行分析。

结果

本研究的参与者认可3种现有的对抗网络成瘾的数字干预措施:谷歌家庭链接、YouTube儿童版和苹果家长控制。他们认为数字干预措施有助于持续促进儿童健康的数字行为,并在监督方面为家长提供支持。然而,由于应用程序的功能和可用性、家长能力、亲子关系、文化不兼容性以及数据隐私等限制,现有的干预措施并未得到广泛使用。

结论

研究结果表明,数字干预措施不仅应专注于限制和监控屏幕使用时间,还应注重为儿童推荐替代活动、培养儿童对抗成瘾行为的能力、提高儿童和家长的数字素养,以及支持家长做出促进孩子健康数字行为的决策。本文还为未来的数字干预措施提供了建议,比如提高现有功能的可用性和相关性、研究游戏化功能以增强家长管理孩子上网的动力和能力、提供适合用户特点的定制或个性化内容,以及考虑提供关于干预措施使用和隐私协议的培训与信息。

相似文献

1
Digital Interventions for Combating Internet Addiction in Young Children: Qualitative Study of Parent and Therapist Perspectives.用于对抗幼儿网络成瘾的数字干预措施:家长和治疗师观点的定性研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Apr 26;7:e55364. doi: 10.2196/55364.
2
Preventive Interventions for Internet Addiction in Young Children: Systematic Review.预防幼儿网络成瘾的干预措施:系统评价。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Aug 30;11:e56896. doi: 10.2196/56896.
3
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
4
A systematic evaluation of digital nutrition promotion websites and apps for supporting parents to influence children's nutrition.系统评价数字营养推广网站和应用程序,以支持父母影响儿童营养。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 10;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-0915-1.
5
The Socioeconomic Indicators Linked to Parent Health-Related Technology Use: Cross-sectional Survey.与父母健康相关的技术使用相关的社会经济指标:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 30;24(11):e37455. doi: 10.2196/37455.
6
Characteristics of Acute Childhood Illness Apps for Parents: Environmental Scan.家长用急性儿童疾病应用程序的特点:环境扫描。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 19;23(10):e29441. doi: 10.2196/29441.
7
Digital Behavior Change Interventions for Younger Children With Chronic Health Conditions: Systematic Review.数字行为改变干预措施在患有慢性健康状况的幼儿中的应用:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 31;22(7):e16924. doi: 10.2196/16924.
8
Digital Interventions to Improve Health Literacy Among Parents of Children Aged 0 to 12 Years With a Health Condition: Systematic Review.数字干预措施提高健康素养的父母的孩子年龄 0 至 12 岁的健康状况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 22;23(12):e31665. doi: 10.2196/31665.
9
Smartphone Users' Persuasion Knowledge in the Context of Consumer mHealth Apps: Qualitative Study.智能手机用户在消费者移动医疗应用背景下的说服知识:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 13;9(4):e16518. doi: 10.2196/16518.
10
Policy Recommendations for Preventing Problematic Internet Use in Schools: A Qualitative Study of Parental Perspectives.预防学校中互联网使用问题的政策建议:基于家长视角的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;18(9):4522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094522.

引用本文的文献

1
On-Off Childhood? A Rapid Review of the Impact of Technology on Children's Health.断断续续的童年?对科技对儿童健康影响的快速回顾。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;13(14):1769. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141769.
2
Preventive Interventions for Internet Addiction in Young Children: Systematic Review.预防幼儿网络成瘾的干预措施:系统评价。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Aug 30;11:e56896. doi: 10.2196/56896.

本文引用的文献

1
Universal Digital Programs for Promoting Mental and Relational Health for Parents of Young Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.普及促进幼儿家长心理健康和人际关系的数字程序:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;27(1):23-52. doi: 10.1007/s10567-023-00457-0. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
2
The impact of therapeutic persuasiveness on engagement and outcomes in unguided interventions: A randomized pilot trial of a digital parent training program for child behavior problems.治疗说服力对无指导干预中参与度和结果的影响:一项针对儿童行为问题的数字家长培训项目的随机试点试验。
Internet Interv. 2023 Oct 4;34:100680. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100680. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Treatment Modalities for Internet Addiction in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).儿童和青少年网络成瘾的治疗方式:随机对照试验(RCTs)的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 May 8;12(9):3345. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093345.
4
Digital Addiction Intervention for Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.儿童和青少年数字成瘾干预:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 8;20(6):4777. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064777.
5
Making Sense of Theories, Models, and Frameworks in Digital Health Behavior Change Design: Qualitative Descriptive Study.在数字健康行为改变设计中理解理论、模型和框架:定性描述性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 15;25:e45095. doi: 10.2196/45095.
6
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Supportive Parenting App on Parental Outcomes: Randomized Controlled Trial.评估支持性育儿应用对父母结果的有效性:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 16;25:e41859. doi: 10.2196/41859.
7
Interactional theory of childhood problematic media use.儿童问题性媒体使用的互动理论。
Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020 Oct;2(4):343-353. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.217. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
8
Parents' Perspectives on Their Relationship With Their Adolescent Children With Internet Addiction: Survey Study.父母对其与患有网络成瘾的青春期子女关系的看法:调查研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Oct 5;5(4):e35466. doi: 10.2196/35466.
9
Editorial Perspective: Reducing mental health disparities among underserved youth: using technology to equip parents as agents of change.社论观点:减少服务不足青年的心理健康差距:利用技术使父母成为变革的推动者。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;64(3):480-483. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13703. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
10
Internet addiction and child physical and mental health: Evidence from panel dataset in China.网络成瘾与儿童身心健康:来自中国面板数据的证据。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 15;309:52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.115. Epub 2022 Apr 22.