• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同器械拔除第三磨牙类似的骨去除术中的温度变化。

Temperature variations during bone removal procedures similar to third molar extraction using different instruments.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Alameda Dr. Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla, 9-75, Bauru, SP 17012-901, Brazil.

Department of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology and Radiology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Alameda Dr. Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla, 9-75, Bauru, SP 17012-901, Brazil.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;62(5):459-463. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.01.011
PMID:38670905
Abstract

Bone removal is commonly used in the extraction of third molars and the heat generated during the process can interfere with the repair of bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the temperature variation presented in bone removal performed with a high-speed turbine (400000 rpm), implant motor with straight piece (100000 rpm), low-speed micromotor (20000 rpm) and piezoelectric saw (30 kHz) in pig mandibles. For this, bone removal was carried out around 20 posterior teeth, under constant saline solution irrigation with a syringe and needle. In addition, the time required to perform bone removal was recorded. The results indicated a mean (SD) temperature variation of 0.96 °C (0.6 °C) for the high-speed turbine, 1.38 °C (0.5 °C) with the implant motor, 2.22 °C (0.7 °C) for the low-speed micromotor and 2.90 °C (1.3 °C) for the piezoelectric saw. The conventional variance was calculated discounting the variation of time used for bone removal around the teeth. There was a statistically significant difference in temperature variation between the high-speed turbine vs the micromotor (p = 0.009) and the high speed micromotor vs the piezoelectric saw (p = 0.04). We conclude that there is a statistically significant difference in temperature variation between the instruments used in oral and maxillofacial surgery, with higher rotation speeds resulting in the lowest temperature variations and a reduced surgical time.

摘要

骨切除常用于第三磨牙的拔除,过程中产生的热量会干扰骨的修复。本研究旨在评估高速涡轮机(400000rpm)、带直柄的种植体马达(100000rpm)、低速微电机(20000rpm)和压电锯(30kHz)在猪下颌骨中进行骨切除时的温度变化。为此,在持续盐水冲洗下(通过注射器和针头),围绕 20 颗后牙进行骨切除。此外,还记录了进行骨切除所需的时间。结果表明,高速涡轮机的平均(SD)温度变化为 0.96°C(0.6°C),种植体马达为 1.38°C(0.5°C),低速微电机为 2.22°C(0.7°C),压电锯为 2.90°C(1.3°C)。常规方差是通过扣除围绕牙齿进行骨切除的时间变化来计算的。高速涡轮机与微电机(p=0.009)和高速微电机与压电锯(p=0.04)之间的温度变化差异具有统计学意义。我们得出结论,口腔颌面外科手术中使用的仪器之间的温度变化存在统计学差异,转速越高,温度变化越低,手术时间越短。

相似文献

1
Temperature variations during bone removal procedures similar to third molar extraction using different instruments.不同器械拔除第三磨牙类似的骨去除术中的温度变化。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;62(5):459-463. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
2
Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction.第三磨牙阻生的压电与旋转截骨技术对比研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Jan 1;18(1):60-64. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1990.
3
A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal.一项评估压电手术与传统技术在拔除下颌智齿时的性能的半口随机临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1890-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 13.
4
Intracanal temperature changes during bone preparations close to and penetrating the inferior alveolar canal: Drills versus piezosurgery.在下颌管附近和穿透下颌管进行骨预备时的根管内温度变化:钻具与超声骨刀。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Oct;45(10):1622-1631. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
5
Piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations.在阻生第三磨牙手术中,压电设备与传统旋转器械的比较:手术难度与术后疼痛的关系及组织学评价。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):e33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
6
Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.压电技术与传统旋转技术用于拔除阻生第三磨牙:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(41):e1685. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001685.
7
Piezosurgery or conventional rotatory instruments for inferior third molar extractions?拔除下颌第三磨牙时使用压电手术器械还是传统旋转器械?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;72(9):1647-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.032. Epub 2014 May 6.
8
Four osteotomy methods with piezosurgery to remove complicated mandibular third molars: a retrospective study.使用超声骨刀的四种截骨方法拔除复杂下颌第三磨牙:一项回顾性研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Nov;72(11):2126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.028. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
9
Bone heat generated using conventional implant drills versus piezosurgery unit during apical cortical plate perforation.常规种植体钻头与超声骨刀在根尖皮质骨穿孔时产热的比较。
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89(6):661-668. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0502.
10
Does the use of cooled saline irrigation during third molar surgery affect post-operative morbidity?在第三磨牙手术中使用冷却的盐水冲洗会影响术后发病率吗?
Evid Based Dent. 2022 Dec;23(4):142-143. doi: 10.1038/s41432-022-0843-9. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Neurosensory Changes in Orthognathic Surgery Using Saw or Piezoelectric Devices: A Scoping Review.使用锯或压电设备进行正颌外科手术时神经感觉变化的分析:一项范围综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 12;14(10):3371. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103371.
2
The Comparative Efficacy of Burs Versus Piezoelectric Techniques in Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review Following the PRISMA Guidelines.第三磨牙手术中涡轮钻与压电技术的比较疗效:一项遵循PRISMA指南的系统评价
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 12;60(12):2049. doi: 10.3390/medicina60122049.