Wimer Gabrielle, Larrea Maria, Streeter Josefina, Hassan Amir, Angulo Alejandra, Armijos Andrea, Bonz Annie, Tol Wietse A, Greene M Claire
Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Hunter College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;21(4):380. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040380.
There is increasing guidance promoting the provision of mental health and psychosocial support programs to both migrant and host community members in humanitarian settings. However, there is a lack of information on the respective experiences and benefits for migrant and host community members who are participating in mental health and psychosocial support programming. We evaluated a community-based psychosocial program for migrant and host community women, Entre Nosotras, which was implemented with an international non-governmental organization in Ecuador in 2021. Data on participant characteristics and psychosocial wellbeing were collected via pre/post surveys with 143 participants, and qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset ( = 61) of participants. All quantitative analyses were conducted in STATA, and qualitative analysis was done in NVivo. Attendance was higher for host community members. Specifically, 71.4% of host community members attended 4-5 sessions, whereas only 37.4% of migrants attended 4-5 sessions ( = 0.004). Qualitative analysis shows that the intervention was less accessible for migrants due to a variety of structural barriers. However, this analysis also demonstrated that both groups of women felt a greater sense of social connectedness after participating in the program and expressed gratitude for the bonds they formed with other women. Some migrant women described negative experiences with the host community because they felt as though they could not confide in host community women and speak freely in front of them. These results underscore how the migratory context influences the implementation of mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) programs. As humanitarian guidelines continue to emphasize the integration of host community members and displaced persons, it is critical to account for how the same intervention may impact these populations differently.
越来越多的指导意见提倡在人道主义环境中为移民和东道社区成员提供心理健康和社会心理支持项目。然而,对于参与心理健康和社会心理支持项目的移民和东道社区成员各自的经历和益处,目前缺乏相关信息。我们评估了一个针对移民和东道社区女性的社区社会心理项目“Entre Nosotras”,该项目于2021年与厄瓜多尔的一个国际非政府组织合作实施。通过对143名参与者进行前后调查收集了参与者特征和社会心理健康数据,并对一部分参与者(n = 61)进行了定性访谈。所有定量分析均在STATA中进行,定性分析在NVivo中完成。东道社区成员的出勤率更高。具体而言,71.4%的东道社区成员参加了4 - 5次课程,而只有37.4%的移民参加了4 - 5次课程(p = 0.004)。定性分析表明,由于各种结构性障碍,移民参与该干预措施的难度更大。然而,该分析也表明,两组女性在参与项目后都感受到了更强的社会联系感,并对她们与其他女性建立的联系表示感激。一些移民女性描述了与东道社区的负面经历,因为她们觉得自己无法向东道社区女性倾诉,也不能在她们面前自由发言。这些结果强调了移民背景如何影响心理健康和社会心理支持(MHPSS)项目的实施。随着人道主义指导方针继续强调东道社区成员和流离失所者的融合,考虑同一干预措施对这些人群可能产生的不同影响至关重要。