Lederer Theresa, Hipler Noam M, Thon Cosima, Kupcinskas Juozas, Link Alexander
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Department of Gastroenterology and Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Genes (Basel). 2024 Apr 16;15(4):498. doi: 10.3390/genes15040498.
Fecal specimens have long been regarded as promising sources for gastrointestinal cancer screening and have, thus, been extensively investigated in biomarker research. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding RNA molecules involved in regulating various biological processes. They are commonly dysregulated during tumor development and exhibit differential expression in feces. To assess the preanalytical feasibility of fecal miRNA analysis, we systematically compared the performance of commonly used total RNA extraction methods. Fecal samples from healthy subjects were utilized for this evaluation. Various methods, including miRNeasy, Universal, Trizol, RNeasy, and mirVana kits, were employed to isolate total RNA. MiRNA expression analyses were conducted using TaqMan or SYBR Green qRT-PCR for a subset of miRNAs, with externally spiked-in cel-miR-39 used for normalization. Most methods demonstrated similar performance in terms of the total RNA concentration and purity. Externally spiked cel-miR-39 and endogenous miRNAs (RNU6b, miR-16, and miR-21) exhibited comparable concentrations across the different RNA isolation methods, whereas the RNeasy mini kit consistently yielded lower values. Our findings suggest that various isolation methods produce reproducible and comparable miRNA expression results, supporting the potential comparability and translational applicability of miRNA-based biomarker research in the future.
长期以来,粪便样本一直被视为胃肠道癌筛查的有前景的来源,因此在生物标志物研究中受到了广泛研究。微小RNA(miRNA)是参与调节各种生物过程的小的非编码RNA分子。它们在肿瘤发生过程中通常失调,并在粪便中表现出差异表达。为了评估粪便miRNA分析的分析前可行性,我们系统地比较了常用的总RNA提取方法的性能。本评估使用了健康受试者的粪便样本。采用了多种方法,包括miRNeasy、通用、Trizol、RNeasy和mirVana试剂盒来分离总RNA。使用TaqMan或SYBR Green qRT-PCR对一部分miRNA进行miRNA表达分析,使用外部掺入的cel-miR-39进行标准化。大多数方法在总RNA浓度和纯度方面表现出相似的性能。外部掺入的cel-miR-39和内源性miRNA(RNU6b、miR-16和miR-21)在不同的RNA分离方法中表现出相当的浓度,而RNeasy迷你试剂盒始终产生较低的值。我们的研究结果表明,各种分离方法产生可重复且可比的miRNA表达结果,支持未来基于miRNA的生物标志物研究的潜在可比性和转化适用性。