Suppr超能文献

感染龄对实验感染的工蜂肠道微生物群的影响

Influence of Age of Infection on the Gut Microbiota in Worker Honey Bees () Experimentally Infected with .

作者信息

Aguado-López Daniel, Urbieta Magro Almudena, Higes Mariano, Rodríguez Juan Miguel, Martín-Hernández Raquel

机构信息

Laboratorio de Patología Apícola, Centro de Investigación Apícola y Agroambiental (CIAPA), Instituto Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario y Forestal (IRIAF), Consejería de Agricultura de la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha, Camino de San Martín s/n, 19180 Marchamalo, Spain.

Departamento de Nutrición y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2024 Mar 22;12(4):635. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12040635.

Abstract

The gut microbiota of honey bees has received increasing interest in the past decades due to its crucial role in their health, and can be disrupted by pathogen infection. is an intracellular parasite that affects the epithelial cells of the midgut, altering gut homeostasis and representing a major threat to honey bees. Previous studies indicated that younger worker bees are more susceptible to experimental infection by this parasite, although the impact of infection and of age on the gut bacterial communities remains unclear. To address this, honey bees were experimentally infected with a consistent number of spores at various ages post-emergence (p.e.) and the gut bacteria 7 days post-infection (p.i.) were analysed using real-time quantitative PCR, with the results compared to non-infected controls. Infected bees had a significantly higher proportion and load of . In respect to the age of infection, the bees infected just after emergence had elevated loads of , , spp., spp., , and . Moreover, the load was higher in bees infected at nearly all ages, whereas older non-infected bees had higher loads of , spp., spp., , and . These findings suggest that infection and, in particular, the age of bees at infection modulate the gut bacterial community, with being the most severely affected species.

摘要

在过去几十年里,蜜蜂的肠道微生物群因其对蜜蜂健康的关键作用而受到越来越多的关注,并且会因病原体感染而受到破坏。[寄生虫名称]是一种细胞内寄生虫,它会影响中肠的上皮细胞,改变肠道内环境稳定,对蜜蜂构成重大威胁。先前的研究表明,年轻的工蜂更容易受到这种寄生虫的实验性感染,尽管感染和年龄对肠道细菌群落的影响仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,在蜜蜂羽化后的不同年龄阶段,用一致数量的[孢子名称]对其进行实验性感染,并在感染后7天使用实时定量PCR分析肠道细菌,将结果与未感染的对照组进行比较。感染的蜜蜂中[细菌名称]的比例和数量显著更高。关于感染年龄,刚羽化后就被感染的蜜蜂中,[细菌名称1]、[细菌名称2]、[细菌名称3]属、[细菌名称4]属、[细菌名称5]和[细菌名称6]的数量增加。此外,几乎在所有年龄被感染的蜜蜂中,[特定细菌名称]的数量都更高,而未感染的老年蜜蜂中,[细菌名称7]、[细菌名称8]属、[细菌名称9]属、[细菌名称10]和[细菌名称11]的数量更高。这些发现表明,[寄生虫名称]感染,特别是蜜蜂的感染年龄会调节肠道细菌群落,其中[特定细菌名称]是受影响最严重的物种。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea5f/11051791/8feb662ea8c0/microorganisms-12-00635-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of Age of Infection on the Gut Microbiota in Worker Honey Bees () Experimentally Infected with .
Microorganisms. 2024 Mar 22;12(4):635. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12040635.
2
3
The pathological effects of a Nosema ceranae infection in the giant honey bee, Apis dorsata Fabricius, 1793.
J Invertebr Pathol. 2021 Oct;185:107672. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2021.107672. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
The levels of natural Nosema spp. infection in Apis mellifera iberiensis brood stages.
Int J Parasitol. 2019 Jul;49(8):657-667. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
5
Infectivity and virulence of Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis in commercially available North American honey bees.
J Invertebr Pathol. 2015 Jan;124:107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
6
Asymmetrical coexistence of Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis in honey bees.
J Invertebr Pathol. 2009 Jul;101(3):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 May 23.
7
Age and Method of Inoculation Influence the Infection of Worker Honey Bees () by .
Insects. 2019 Nov 22;10(12):417. doi: 10.3390/insects10120417.
9
Comparative virulence and competition between Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae in honey bees (Apis mellifera).
J Invertebr Pathol. 2015 Feb;125:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2014.12.006. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
10
Influence of Feeding Type and Infection on the Gut Microbiota of Workers.
mSystems. 2018 Nov 6;3(6). doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00177-18. eCollection 2018 Nov-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Bee-Associated Beneficial Microbes-Importance for Bees and for Humans.
Insects. 2024 Jun 6;15(6):430. doi: 10.3390/insects15060430.

本文引用的文献

2
Community Dynamics in Structure and Function of Honey Bee Gut Bacteria in Response to Winter Dietary Shift.
mBio. 2022 Oct 26;13(5):e0113122. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01131-22. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
3
Alterations in the Microbiota of Caged Honeybees in the Presence of Nosema ceranae Infection and Related Changes in Functionality.
Microb Ecol. 2023 Jul;86(1):601-616. doi: 10.1007/s00248-022-02050-4. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
4
Social microbiota and social gland gene expression of worker honey bees by age and climate.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 23;12(1):10690. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14442-0.
6
Age and Season Effect the Timing of Adult Worker Honeybee Infection by .
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Jan 28;11:823050. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.823050. eCollection 2021.
7
() Infection Alters Honey Bee Microbiota Composition and Sustains the Survival of Adult Honey Bees.
Biology (Basel). 2021 Sep 13;10(9):905. doi: 10.3390/biology10090905.
8
The Gut Microbiota Protects Bees from Invasion by a Bacterial Pathogen.
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0039421. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00394-21. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
9
10
Compartmentalization of bacterial and fungal microbiomes in the gut of adult honeybees.
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021 May 7;7(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00212-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验