Suppr超能文献

注册临床试验设计评估:L-精氨酸和/或L-瓜氨酸干预高血压的比较

Assessment of Registered Clinical Trial Designs: Comparison of L-Arginine and/or L-Citrulline Interventions for Hypertension.

作者信息

Hillsley Ashley Brett, McLachlan Craig Steven

机构信息

Center for Healthy Futures, Torrens University Australia, Surry Hills, NSW 2010, Australia.

出版信息

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Apr 8;17(4):477. doi: 10.3390/ph17040477.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

L-Arginine (Arg) is an essential amino acid and a precursor for the synthesis of vascular nitric oxide, while L-Citrulline is a non-essential amino acid substrate for increasing L-arginine. Both L-arginine and L-Citrulline in translational studies may acutely lower the blood pressure. Current meta-analysis for L-arginine or L-Citrulline interventions in blood pressure have identified significant heterogeneity. Clinical trial evidence for L-arginine or L-Citrulline in chronic blood pressure reduction in the general population requires an examination of trial designs, as not all translational studies may have influenced vascular reactivity. Our aims are to explore whether L-arginine and L-citrulline intervention trials in chronic blood pressure consider standardized end points relevant to the general adult populations.

METHODS

A step-wise search on clinicaltrials.gov, the U.S. Library of Medicine registry for clinical trials, was performed including the following keyword search parameters: "completed" "L-Citrulline" "L-arginine" trial", and "adults", involving "blood pressure" reduction as a primary end point in adult humans.

RESULTS

Of the forty-four completed trials, only five were included for analysis. Following the careful evaluation of trial design, we observed heterogeneity across participant inclusion criteria (population sample size, age range, sex), interventional design (dosages, duration), and primary outcomes, measured with respect to changes in diastolic or systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, there is a lack of robust trial design evidence to suggest that L-arginine or L-Citrulline, based on current RCTs in the general population, have an overall positive effect on vascular endothelial reactivity and a beneficial chronic blood pressure-lowering effect. Indeed, conclusions drawn from human meta-analysis studies have been heterogenous between studies, which may be attributed to study design heterogeneity, including differences in sample population, age, and blood pressure at the time of entry. Inconsistencies in the study design poses a challenge for systematic reviews and meta-analysis to accurately assess the effect size and impact of L-arginine or L-citrulline on both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

摘要

背景

L-精氨酸(Arg)是一种必需氨基酸,也是血管一氧化氮合成的前体,而L-瓜氨酸是增加L-精氨酸的非必需氨基酸底物。在转化研究中,L-精氨酸和L-瓜氨酸均可使血压急性降低。目前关于L-精氨酸或L-瓜氨酸干预血压的荟萃分析已发现显著的异质性。在一般人群中,L-精氨酸或L-瓜氨酸降低慢性血压的临床试验证据需要对试验设计进行审查,因为并非所有转化研究都可能影响血管反应性。我们的目的是探讨慢性血压的L-精氨酸和L-瓜氨酸干预试验是否考虑了与一般成年人群相关的标准化终点。

方法

在clinicaltrials.gov(美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册库)上进行逐步搜索,包括以下关键词搜索参数:“已完成”“L-瓜氨酸”“L-精氨酸”“试验”以及“成年人”,将降低“血压”作为成年人类的主要终点。

结果

在44项已完成的试验中,仅纳入5项进行分析。在仔细评估试验设计后,我们观察到参与者纳入标准(人群样本量、年龄范围、性别)、干预设计(剂量、持续时间)以及以舒张压或收缩压变化衡量的主要结局存在异质性。

结论

总之,基于目前一般人群的随机对照试验,缺乏有力的试验设计证据表明L-精氨酸或L-瓜氨酸对血管内皮反应性具有总体积极影响以及有益的慢性降压作用。实际上,不同研究之间从人类荟萃分析研究得出的结论存在异质性,这可能归因于研究设计的异质性,包括样本人群、年龄以及入组时血压的差异。研究设计的不一致给系统评价和荟萃分析准确评估L-精氨酸或L-瓜氨酸对收缩压和舒张压的效应大小及影响带来了挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/025f/11053694/6b4ecf82a071/pharmaceuticals-17-00477-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验