Liu Rong, Natekar Janhavi P, Kim Ki-Hye, Pathak Heather, Bhatnagar Noopur, Raha Jannatul Ruhan, Park Bo Ryoung, Guglani Anchala, Shin Chong Hyun, Kumar Mukesh, Kang Sang-Moo
Center for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Mar 27;12(4):362. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12040362.
The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants continues to cause challenging problems for the effective control of COVID-19. In this study, we tested the hypothesis of whether a strategy of multivalent and sequential heterologous spike protein vaccinations would induce a broader range and higher levels of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants and more effective protection than homologous spike protein vaccination in a mouse model. We determined spike-specific IgG, receptor-binding inhibition titers, and protective efficacy in the groups of mice that were vaccinated with multivalent recombinant spike proteins (Wuhan, Delta, Omicron), sequentially with heterologous spike protein variants, or with homologous spike proteins. Trivalent (Wuhan + Delta + Omicron) and sequential heterologous spike protein vaccinations were more effective in inducing serum inhibition activities of receptor binding to spike variants and virus neutralizing antibody titers than homologous spike protein vaccination. The higher efficacy of protection was observed in mice with trivalent and sequential heterologous spike protein vaccination after a challenge with a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 MA10 strain compared to homologous spike protein vaccination. This study provides evidence that a strategy of multivalent and sequential heterologous variant spike vaccination might provide more effective protection against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants than homologous spike vaccination and significantly alleviate severe inflammation due to COVID-19.
新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变体的出现继续给有效控制2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)带来具有挑战性的问题。在本研究中,我们测试了一个假设,即在小鼠模型中,与同源刺突蛋白疫苗接种相比,多价和序贯异源刺突蛋白疫苗接种策略是否能诱导更广泛的范围和更高水平的针对SARS-CoV-2变体的中和抗体以及更有效的保护。我们测定了用多价重组刺突蛋白(武汉株、德尔塔株、奥密克戎株)接种、依次用异源刺突蛋白变体接种或用同源刺突蛋白接种的小鼠组中的刺突特异性IgG、受体结合抑制效价和保护效力。与同源刺突蛋白疫苗接种相比,三价(武汉株+德尔塔株+奥密克戎株)和序贯异源刺突蛋白疫苗接种在诱导受体与刺突变体结合的血清抑制活性和病毒中和抗体效价方面更有效。在用适应小鼠的SARS-CoV-2 MA10株攻击后,与同源刺突蛋白疫苗接种相比,在接受三价和序贯异源刺突蛋白疫苗接种的小鼠中观察到更高的保护效力。本研究提供了证据,表明多价和序贯异源变体刺突疫苗接种策略可能比同源刺突疫苗接种提供更有效的针对新出现的SARS-CoV-2变体的保护,并显著减轻因COVID-19引起的严重炎症。