Suppr超能文献

通过使用植物基颗粒粘结剂来保持颗粒饲料的物理质量和消化率。

Maintaining the physical quality and digestibility of pellet feed through the use of plant-based pellet binder.

作者信息

Jaelani Achmad, Rostini Tintin, Sugiarti Muhammad Irwan Zakir Sugiarti, Fitryani Rayhana

机构信息

Department of Animal Husbandry, Agricultural Faculty, Kalimantan Islamic University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia.

出版信息

J Adv Vet Anim Res. 2024 Mar 31;11(1):93-99. doi: 10.5455/javar.2024.k752. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze the effects of the use of binders on the physical quality and digestibility of Alabio ducks ( Borneo).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pellet binders used tapioca meal (TM) (), sago meal (SM) ( Rottb.), and sweet potato meal (SPM) () pelleted feed. Laying Alabio ducks, around 120 birds, aged 20 weeks with an average body weight of 1,426 ± 113.5 gm, were used. A fully randomized design with 4 treatments and 15 repeats was used in this study. The variables measured include the physical quality and digestibility of pellet feed. Data analysis used a Fisher test. For the distinction between treatments, the Duncan multiple-range test was conducted.

RESULTS

The finding showed that the plant-based pellet binder had a natural effect on physical properties, including pellet durability index, moisture content, threshold power, stack density, and stack compacted density. The strength of the pellet binder is seen in the durability index of TM 98.12%, SM 97.64%, and SPM 97.35%, respectively. However, these variables did not differ significantly in terms of specific gravity and stack angle. Pellet binders considerably affect the consumption of feed and vary markedly in dry matter, organic matter, and metabolizable energy digestibility.

CONCLUSION

Plant-based pellet binders influence the physical quality and digestibility of pelleted feed in Alabio ducks. TM can maintain physical quality and digestibility compared to SM and SPM as plant-based pellet binders.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析使用粘结剂对婆罗洲阿拉比奥鸭的物理品质和消化率的影响。

材料与方法

颗粒粘结剂使用木薯粉(TM)( )、西米粉(SM)(罗特布.)和红薯粉(SPM)( )制成颗粒饲料。选用约120只20周龄、平均体重为1426±113.5克的产蛋阿拉比奥鸭。本研究采用完全随机设计,有4种处理和15次重复。测量的变量包括颗粒饲料的物理品质和消化率。数据分析采用费舍尔检验。为区分处理之间的差异,进行了邓肯多重范围检验。

结果

研究结果表明,植物基颗粒粘结剂对物理性质有天然影响,包括颗粒耐久性指数、水分含量、阈值功率、堆密度和堆压实密度。颗粒粘结剂的强度分别体现在TM的耐久性指数为98.12%、SM为97.64%、SPM为97.35%。然而,这些变量在比重和堆角方面没有显著差异。颗粒粘结剂对饲料消耗有很大影响,在干物质、有机物和代谢能消化率方面有明显差异。

结论

植物基颗粒粘结剂影响阿拉比奥鸭颗粒饲料的物理品质和消化率。作为植物基颗粒粘结剂,与SM和SPM相比,TM能保持物理品质和消化率。

相似文献

10
Thermal processing of corn and physical form of broiler diets.玉米的热处理和肉鸡日粮的物理形态。
Poult Sci. 2020 Jun;99(6):3188-3195. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 May 4.

本文引用的文献

5
Low cost 3D printing of metals using filled polymer pellets.使用填充聚合物颗粒进行低成本金属3D打印。
HardwareX. 2022 Mar 12;11:e00292. doi: 10.1016/j.ohx.2022.e00292. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Quality aspects in the development of pelletized dosage forms.颗粒剂剂型开发中的质量因素。
Heliyon. 2022 Feb 15;8(2):e08956. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08956. eCollection 2022 Feb.
9
Experimental data on the properties of pelletization of palm kernel shell using sago starch and sodium acetate.
Data Brief. 2020 Nov 15;33:106535. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106535. eCollection 2020 Dec.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验