DeRogatis Michael J, Malige Ajith, Wang Nigel, Dubin Jeremy, Issack Paul, Sadler Adam, Brogle Patrick, Konopitski Andrew
St. Luke's University Health Network, PPHP 2, 801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA.
Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, 2401 W Belvedere Ave 2nd Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21215, USA.
J Orthop. 2024 Apr 16;55:105-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.04.013. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty has become an increasingly popular technique over the past several years. Manual total knee arthroplasty can be associated with acute blood loss anemia. Instrumentation of the femoral canal with the alignment guide may in part contribute to this blood loss. Because the femoral canal is not entered during robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty, the blood loss may be lower compared to that seen in manual total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine if acute blood loss is greater in manually instrumented total knee arthroplasty versus robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty.
This retrospective cohort study was performed in a large tertiary academic hospital network by two fellowship trained surgeons. Patients underwent either robotic assisted or manually instrumented total knee arthroplasty and were assessed for postoperative acute blood loss anemia, defined as hemoglobin <13 g/dL for males or <12 g/dL for females plus a 2 g/dL drop from preoperative levels, as well as postoperative drop in hemoglobin.
A total of 75 patients were included in each study arm. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in postoperative hemoglobin in robotic assisted (2.1 g/dL) compared to manually instrumented total knee arthroplasty (2.1 g/dL). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative acute blood loss anemia between robotic assisted (45 %) and manually instrumented total knee arthroplasty (39 %). Higher BMI and increased age were protective against postoperative drop in hemoglobin. These protective effects were not significant when controlling for confounding variables. Surgical time was significantly longer for robotic assisted (99 min) versus manually instrumented total knee arthroplasty (86 min) (p < 0.001).
There is no significant difference in acute blood loss when comparing patients undergoing robotic assisted and manually instrumented total knee arthroplasty.
在过去几年中,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术已成为一种越来越受欢迎的技术。手动全膝关节置换术可能与急性失血贫血有关。使用对线导向器对股骨髓腔进行操作可能部分导致了这种失血。由于在机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中不进入股骨髓腔,与手动全膝关节置换术相比,失血量可能更低。本研究的目的是确定手动器械辅助全膝关节置换术与机器人辅助全膝关节置换术相比,急性失血是否更多。
这项回顾性队列研究由两位经过专科培训的外科医生在一个大型三级学术医院网络中进行。患者接受了机器人辅助或手动器械辅助全膝关节置换术,并评估术后急性失血贫血情况,定义为男性血红蛋白<13 g/dL或女性血红蛋白<12 g/dL,且较术前水平下降2 g/dL,以及术后血红蛋白下降情况。
每个研究组共纳入75例患者。机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(2.1 g/dL)与手动器械辅助全膝关节置换术(2.1 g/dL)术后血红蛋白无显著差异(p>0.05)。机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(45%)与手动器械辅助全膝关节置换术(39%)术后急性失血贫血的发生率无显著差异。较高的体重指数和年龄增长对术后血红蛋白下降有保护作用。在控制混杂变量时,这些保护作用不显著。机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(99分钟)的手术时间明显长于手动器械辅助全膝关节置换术(86分钟)(p<0.001)。
比较接受机器人辅助和手动器械辅助全膝关节置换术的患者,急性失血无显著差异。