• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前进还是停滞:ChatGPT能否应用于神经外科环境中寻求健康信息?

Walking forward or on hold: Could the ChatGPT be applied for seeking health information in neurosurgical settings?

作者信息

Yan Si-Yu, Liu Yi-Fan, Ma Lu, Xiao Ling-Long, Hu Xin, Guo Rui, You Chao, Tian Rui

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.

West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu Sichuan China.

出版信息

Ibrain. 2024 Mar 9;10(1):111-115. doi: 10.1002/ibra.12149. eCollection 2024 Spring.

DOI:10.1002/ibra.12149
PMID:38682012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11045188/
Abstract

Self-management is important for patients suffering from cerebrovascular events after neurosurgical procedures. An increasing number of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tools have been used in postoperative health management. ChatGPT is a new trend dialog-based chatbot that could be used as a supplemental tool for seeking health information. Responses from ChatGPT version 3.5 and 4.0 toward 13 questions raised by experienced neurosurgeons were evaluated in this exploratory study for their consistency and appropriateness blindly by the other three neurosurgeons. The readability of response text was investigated quantitively by word count and the Gunning Fog and Flesch-Kincaid indices. Results showed that the chatbot could provide relatively stable output between the two versions on consistency and appropriateness (² = 0.348). As for readability, there was a higher demand for readers to comprehend the output text in the 4.0 version (more counts of words; lower Flesch-Kincaid reading ease score; and higher Flesch-Kincaid grade level). In general, the capacity of ChatGPT to deliver effective health information is still under debate.

摘要

自我管理对于神经外科手术后患有脑血管疾病的患者很重要。越来越多的人工智能(AI)辅助工具已被用于术后健康管理。ChatGPT是一种基于对话的新型聊天机器人,可作为获取健康信息的补充工具。在这项探索性研究中,由另外三位神经外科医生盲目评估了ChatGPT 3.5版和4.0版对经验丰富的神经外科医生提出的13个问题的回答的一致性和适当性。通过单词计数、冈宁雾度和弗莱施-金凯德指数对回答文本的可读性进行了定量研究。结果表明,在一致性和适当性方面,两个版本的聊天机器人可以提供相对稳定的输出(² = 0.348)。至于可读性,4.0版对读者理解输出文本的要求更高(单词数更多;弗莱施-金凯德阅读简易度得分更低;弗莱施-金凯德年级水平更高)。总体而言,ChatGPT提供有效健康信息的能力仍存在争议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d968/11045188/5fea76d15407/IBRA-10-111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d968/11045188/5fea76d15407/IBRA-10-111-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d968/11045188/5fea76d15407/IBRA-10-111-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Walking forward or on hold: Could the ChatGPT be applied for seeking health information in neurosurgical settings?前进还是停滞:ChatGPT能否应用于神经外科环境中寻求健康信息?
Ibrain. 2024 Mar 9;10(1):111-115. doi: 10.1002/ibra.12149. eCollection 2024 Spring.
2
Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool in Prostate Cancer: Multimetric Assessment.评估 ChatGPT 在前列腺癌患者教育中的疗效:多指标评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e55939. doi: 10.2196/55939.
3
Generative artificial intelligence chatbots may provide appropriate informational responses to common vascular surgery questions by patients.生成式人工智能聊天机器人可能会为患者关于常见血管外科问题提供恰当的信息性回复。
Vascular. 2025 Feb;33(1):229-237. doi: 10.1177/17085381241240550. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Readability, accuracy and appropriateness and quality of AI chatbot responses as a patient information source on root canal retreatment: A comparative assessment.作为根管再治疗患者信息来源的人工智能聊天机器人回复的可读性、准确性、恰当性和质量:一项比较评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Sep;201:105948. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105948. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
5
American academy of Orthopedic Surgeons' OrthoInfo provides more readable information regarding meniscus injury than ChatGPT-4 while information accuracy is comparable.美国矫形外科医师学会的OrthoInfo在半月板损伤方面提供了比ChatGPT-4更具可读性的信息,而信息准确性相当。
J ISAKOS. 2025 Apr;11:100843. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100843. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
6
Optimizing Ophthalmology Patient Education via ChatBot-Generated Materials: Readability Analysis of AI-Generated Patient Education Materials and The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patient Brochures.通过聊天机器人生成的材料优化眼科患者教育:人工智能生成的患者教育材料和美国眼科整形重建外科学会患者手册的可读性分析。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;40(2):212-216. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002549. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
7
Assessing the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Cardiac Catheterization From Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.评估人工智能聊天机器人提供的心脏导管插入术患者教育材料的可读性:一项观察性横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 4;16(7):e63865. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63865. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Glaucoma Questions Adapted From Patient Brochures.人工智能聊天机器人对改编自患者手册的青光眼问题的回答情况。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 23;16(3):e56766. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56766. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Assessing the Quality and Reliability of ChatGPT's Responses to Radiotherapy-Related Patient Queries: Comparative Study With GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.评估ChatGPT对放疗相关患者问题回答的质量和可靠性:与GPT-3.5和GPT-4的比较研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Apr 16;11:e63677. doi: 10.2196/63677.
10
Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT to Accurately Simplify Patient-centered Information about Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening.评估使用 ChatGPT 准确简化有关乳腺癌预防和筛查的以患者为中心的信息。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Mar;6(2):e230086. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230086.

引用本文的文献

1
Status and perceptions of ChatGPT utilization among medical students: a survey-based study.医学生对ChatGPT应用的现状与认知:一项基于调查的研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):831. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07438-7.
2
Large language models in patient education: a scoping review of applications in medicine.用于患者教育的大语言模型:医学应用的范围综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 29;11:1477898. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1477898. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Using ChatGPT to evaluate cancer myths and misconceptions: artificial intelligence and cancer information.利用 ChatGPT 评估癌症谣言和误解:人工智能与癌症信息。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Mar 1;7(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad015.
2
Appropriateness of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Recommendations Obtained From a Popular Online Chat-Based Artificial Intelligence Model.从一个基于在线聊天的流行人工智能模型获取的心血管疾病预防建议的适宜性。
JAMA. 2023 Mar 14;329(10):842-844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1044.
3
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove.
研究论文将ChatGPT列为作者:许多科学家表示反对。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7945):620-621. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z.
4
Online advice for the symptomatic management of post-stroke fatigue: A scoping review.在线建议:针对卒中后疲劳症状的管理:范围综述。
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Nov;162:111039. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111039. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
Patient Perspectives on the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Symptom Checker: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.患者对人工智能辅助症状检查器有用性的看法:横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 30;22(1):e14679. doi: 10.2196/14679.