Liu Shuang, Chen Lin, Shi Qi, Fang Yide, Da Weiwei, Xue Chunchun, Li Xiaofeng
Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200071, P.R. China.
Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Biomed Rep. 2024 Apr 11;20(6):89. doi: 10.3892/br.2024.1778. eCollection 2024 Jun.
To critically evaluate the effects of manual therapy (MT) on pain and functional improvement in patients with rotator cuff injury (RCI), a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on MT for RCI was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan-fang Data, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature database from inception to March 28, 2023. A total of 1,110 participants from 24 eligible RCTs were included in the analysis. Compared with placebo, MT could not effectively relieve pain [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-0.25; 95% CI: -0.51 to 0.01; P=0.06], although its impact on functional improvement appears limited (SMD=0.20; 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.49; P=0.18). Combining MT with exercise had significant advantages over exercise alone, as combined therapy contributed to both pain reduction (SMD=0.36; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.64; P=0.01) and functional enhancement (SMD=0.32; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.52; P=0.002). Furthermore, MT combined with multimodal physiotherapy showed additional benefits in pain reduction (mean difference=1.57; 95% CI: 0.18 to 2.96; P=0.03) and functional improvement (SMD=0.77; 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.12; P<0.0001) compared with multimodal physiotherapy alone. These findings highlight the superior pain alleviation and functional improvement provided by MT when combined with exercise or physiotherapy. Consequently, MT has emerged as a pivotal component of therapeutic intervention for RCI.
为了严格评估手法治疗(MT)对肩袖损伤(RCI)患者疼痛和功能改善的影响,我们在以下数据库中对所有关于RCI的MT随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价:PubMed、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、Embase、科学网、物理治疗证据数据库、中国知网、万方数据、中国科学期刊数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库,检索时间从建库至2023年3月28日。分析纳入了来自24项符合条件的RCT的1110名参与者。与安慰剂相比,MT不能有效缓解疼痛[标准化均数差(SMD)=-0.25;95%置信区间:-0.51至0.01;P=0.06],尽管其对功能改善的影响似乎有限(SMD=0.20;95%置信区间:-0.09至0.49;P=0.18)。与单纯运动相比,MT联合运动具有显著优势,因为联合治疗有助于减轻疼痛(SMD=0.36;95%置信区间:0.08至0.64;P=0.01)和增强功能(SMD=0.32;95%置信区间:0.11至0.52;P=0.002)。此外,与单纯多模式物理治疗相比,MT联合多模式物理治疗在减轻疼痛(均数差=1.57;95%置信区间:0.18至2.96;P=0.03)和功能改善(SMD=0.77;95%置信区间:0.43至1.12;P<0.0001)方面显示出额外的益处。这些发现突出了MT与运动或物理治疗联合时在缓解疼痛和功能改善方面的优势。因此,MT已成为RCI治疗干预的关键组成部分。