Suppr超能文献

在线儿童骨科创伤患者教育材料的可读性

Readability of Online Pediatric Orthopaedic Trauma Patient Education Materials.

作者信息

Ghanem Diane, Avendano John, Wang Elizabeth, Reichard Gabrielle, MacMahon Aoife, Brandt Aaron, Shafiq Babar

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital (Ghanem, Reichard, MacMahon, Brandt, and Shafiq), and the School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (Avendano and Wang).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025 May 1;33(9):e502-e510. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00617. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The importance of web resources for educating orthopaedic trauma patients is well recognized. Yet these resources often exceed the sixth-grade reading level and are too complex for most patients to understand. This study examines the readability of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' (AAOS) pediatric trauma-related educational content compared with similar materials from the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA).

METHODS

Eleven AAOS ( https://www.orthoinfo.org/ ) and nine POSNA ( https://orthokids.org ) pediatric trauma education articles were included. Articles' readability was assessed by two independent examiners using (1) the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) algorithms. The FKGL mean was compared with the sixth-grade level and the average American reading level using a one-sample t -test. A two-sample t -test evaluated the differences in readability between the AAOS and POSNA materials.

RESULTS

A total of 15 unique articles were included. Excellent agreement (>90%) was noted between reviewers for FKGL and FRE. The average (SD) FKGL for AAOS and POSNA articles were 8.5 (0.8) and 9.0 (1.5), respectively, and the FRE scores were 61.2 (3.8) for AAOS and 61.7 (7.7) for POSNA. Only one AAOS article met the sixth-grade reading level. The average readability levels of the AAOS and POSNA articles were markedly higher than the recommended sixth-grade level ( P < 0.001). No notable difference was found in FKGL ( P = 0.47) or FRE ( P = 0.89) when comparing AAOS and POSNA articles.

DISCUSSION

This study indicates that the readability of the AAOS pediatric trauma and POSNA trauma-related articles is well above that which is recommended for the general public, and this has remained so for more than a decade. Both POSNA and AAOS trauma education materials have high readability levels, potentially hindering patient understanding. Improving the readability of these widely used trauma education resources is overdue and will likely improve patient comprehension.

摘要

引言

网络资源对骨科创伤患者教育的重要性已得到广泛认可。然而,这些资源的阅读水平往往超过六年级,大多数患者难以理解。本研究比较了美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)与北美小儿骨科学会(POSNA)的小儿创伤相关教育内容的可读性。

方法

纳入11篇AAOS(https://www.orthoinfo.org/ )和9篇POSNA(https://orthokids.org )的小儿创伤教育文章。由两名独立审查员使用(1)弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(FKGL)和弗莱什阅读简易度(FRE)算法评估文章的可读性。使用单样本t检验将FKGL平均值与六年级水平和美国平均阅读水平进行比较。双样本t检验评估AAOS和POSNA材料在可读性上的差异。

结果

共纳入15篇独特文章。审查员之间在FKGL和FRE上的一致性极佳(>90%)。AAOS和POSNA文章的平均(标准差)FKGL分别为8.5(0.8)和9.0(1.5),FRE分数AAOS为61.2(3.8),POSNA为61.7(7.7)。只有一篇AAOS文章达到六年级阅读水平。AAOS和POSNA文章的平均可读性水平明显高于推荐的六年级水平(P<0.001)。比较AAOS和POSNA文章时,在FKGL(P = 0.47)或FRE(P = 0.89)方面未发现显著差异。

讨论

本研究表明,AAOS小儿创伤和POSNA创伤相关文章的可读性远高于推荐给普通大众的水平,且十多年来一直如此。POSNA和AAOS的创伤教育材料都具有较高的可读性水平,可能会阻碍患者理解。改善这些广泛使用的创伤教育资源的可读性早就该进行了,这可能会提高患者的理解能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验