Laboratory Medicine Department, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Medical school of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0431223. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04312-23. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
Accurate species-level identification of complex (ECC) is crucial for related research. The classification of ECC is based on strain-to-strain phylogenetic congruence, as well as genomic features including average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digitalized DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH). ANI and dDDH derived from whole-genome sequencing have emerged as a reliable metric for assessing genetic relatedness between genomes and are increasingly recognized as a standard for species delimitation. Up to now, there are two different classification methods for ECC. The first one categorizes , a species within ECC, into five subspecies ( subsp. subsp. subsp. subsp. and subsp. ). The second classifies as three species: While the former is well-accepted in the academic area, the latter may have a greater ability to distinguish different species of ECC. To assess the suitability of these identification criteria for clinical ECC isolates, we conducted a comprehensive analysis involving phylogenetic analysis, ANI and dDDH value alignment, virulence gene identification, and capsule typing on 256 clinical ECC strains isolated from the bloodstream. Our findings indicated that the method of categorizing into five subspecies has better correlation and consistency with the molecular characteristics of clinical ECC isolates, as evidenced by phylogenetic analysis, virulence genes, and capsule typing. Therefore, the subspecies-based classification method appears more suitable for taxonomic assignments of clinical ECC isolates.
Standardizing taxonomy of the complex (ECC) is necessary for data integration across diverse studies. The study utilized whole-genome data to accurately identify 256 clinical ECC isolated from bloodstream infections using average nucleotide identity (ANI), digitalized DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH), and phylogenetic analysis. Through comprehensive assessments including phylogenetic analysis, ANI and dDDH comparisons, virulence gene, and capsule typing of the 256 clinical isolates, it was concluded that the classification method based on subspecies exhibited better correlation and consistency with the molecular characteristics of clinical ECC isolates. In summary, this research contributes to the precise identification of clinical ECC at the species level and expands our understanding of ECC.
准确鉴定复杂(ECC)的物种水平对于相关研究至关重要。ECC 的分类基于菌株间的系统发育一致性,以及包括平均核苷酸同一性(ANI)和数字化 DNA-DNA 杂交(dDDH)在内的基因组特征。基于全基因组测序的 ANI 和 dDDH 已成为评估基因组间遗传相关性的可靠指标,并且越来越被认为是物种划分的标准。到目前为止,ECC 有两种不同的分类方法。第一种方法将 ECC 中的一个物种分为五个亚种(subsp. subsp. subsp. subsp. 和 subsp. )。第二种方法将 分为三个种:虽然前者在学术领域被广泛接受,但后者可能具有更大的能力来区分不同的 ECC 物种。为了评估这些鉴定标准对临床 ECC 分离株的适用性,我们对从血液中分离的 256 株临床 ECC 菌株进行了综合分析,包括系统发育分析、ANI 和 dDDH 值比对、毒力基因鉴定和荚膜分型。我们的研究结果表明,将 分为五个亚种的方法与临床 ECC 分离株的分子特征具有更好的相关性和一致性,这可以从系统发育分析、毒力基因和荚膜分型得到证明。因此,基于亚种的分类方法似乎更适合临床 ECC 分离株的分类。
标准化 复杂(ECC)的分类对于跨不同研究的数据集成是必要的。该研究利用全基因组数据,通过平均核苷酸同一性(ANI)、数字化 DNA-DNA 杂交(dDDH)和系统发育分析,准确鉴定了 256 株从血流感染中分离的临床 ECC。通过对 256 株临床分离株的系统发育分析、ANI 和 dDDH 比较、毒力基因和荚膜分型等综合评估,得出结论:基于亚种的分类方法与临床 ECC 分离株的分子特征具有更好的相关性和一致性。综上所述,本研究有助于精确鉴定临床 ECC 的种水平,并扩展了我们对 ECC 的认识。