MY EpiConsulting, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Pulmonary Division, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 16;12:1367797. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1367797. eCollection 2024.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) have been suggested as being capable of promoting inflammation, a key component in the pathways associated with carcinogenesis, cardiovascular disease, and other conditions. As a result, the risk assessment of biological markers as early-stage indicators has the potential to improve translation from experimental toxicologic findings to identifying evidence in human studies. The study aims to review the possible early biological changes in workers exposed to carbon black (CB), followed by an evidentiary quality evaluation to determine the predictive value of the biological markers.
We conducted a literature search to identify epidemiological studies that assessed biological markers that were involved in the inflammatory process at early stages among workers with exposure to CB. We reviewed the studies with specific reference to the study design, statistical analyses, findings, and limitations.
We identified five Chinese studies that investigated the potential impact of exposure to CB on inflammatory markers, bronchial wall thickening, genomic instability, and lung function impairment in CB production workers. Of the five Chinese studies, four were cross-sectional; another study reported results at two-time points over six years of follow-up. The authors of all five studies concluded positive relationships between exposure and the inflammatory cytokine profiles. The weak to very weak correlations between biomarkers and early-stage endpoints were reported.
Most inflammatory markers failed to satisfy the proposed evidentiary quality criteria. The significance of the results of the reviewed studies is limited by the cross-sectional study design, inconsistency in results, uncertain clinical relevance, and high occupational exposures. Based on this review, the risk assessment relying on inflammatory markers does not seem appropriate at this time. Nevertheless, the novel research warrants further exploration in assessing exposure to ENMs and corresponding potential health risks in occupational settings.
背景/目的:工程纳米材料(ENMs)被认为具有促进炎症的能力,而炎症是与致癌作用、心血管疾病和其他疾病相关的途径中的关键组成部分。因此,生物标志物风险评估作为早期指标有可能改善从实验毒理学发现到识别人类研究中证据的转化。本研究旨在综述接触炭黑(CB)的工人中可能出现的早期生物学变化,并对生物标志物的预测价值进行证据质量评估。
我们进行了文献检索,以确定评估暴露于 CB 的工人中炎症过程早期涉及的生物标志物的流行病学研究。我们参考了这些研究,特别关注研究设计、统计分析、发现和局限性。
我们确定了五项中国研究,这些研究调查了暴露于 CB 对炎症标志物、支气管壁增厚、基因组不稳定性和 CB 生产工人肺功能损害的潜在影响。在这五项中国研究中,有四项是横断面研究;另一项研究报告了六年随访期间两个时间点的结果。所有五项研究的作者都得出了暴露与炎症细胞因子谱之间存在正相关关系的结论。生物标志物与早期终点之间的相关性较弱至非常弱。
大多数炎症标志物未能满足提出的证据质量标准。综述研究的结果意义受到横断面研究设计、结果不一致、不确定的临床相关性和高职业暴露的限制。基于这项综述,目前依赖炎症标志物的风险评估似乎并不合适。然而,这项新的研究值得进一步探索,以评估职业环境中对 ENMs 的暴露及其潜在的健康风险。