Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, Phone: +91 9338131843, e-mail:
Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Implantology, Vydehi Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Mar 19;25(3):276-279. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3653.
The current study was carried out to assess the interaction between fibrin clots and dental implants following various surface treatments.
In this investigation, 45 dental implants with dimensions of 16 mm in length and 5 mm in diameter were utilized. They were divided up into three groups, each consisting of fifteen samples. Group I: Control; Group II: Ultraviolet (UV) light treated; and group III: Sandblasted and acid-etching (SLA) treated. Healthy volunteers' venous blood samples were drawn into vacutainer tubes without the use of anticoagulants. The samples were centrifuged for 3 minutes at 2700 rpm in a table centrifuge. The entire implant was submerged in room-temperature liquid fibrinogen for 60 minutes. Then, scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) was used to examine each sample. The inter- and intragroup assessments were obtained using the Mann-Whitney test and the Kruskal-Wallis test; -values less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.
The maximum adhesion of fibrin clot was found in SLA treated group (2.42 ± 0.10) followed by the UV light-treated group (2.18 ± 0.08) and control group (1.20 ± 0.02). There was a statistically significant difference found between the three surface-treated groups ( < 0.001).
All surface-treatment methods exhibit adhesion between the implant surface and the fibrin clot. However, the highest adherence of fibrin clot was found in SLA treated group compared to the UV light-treated and control group.
The physical and chemical characteristics of an implant's surface have a significant impact on the way blood clots organize. At the interface between the implant and the bone, blood clot production can initiate and facilitate the healing process. How to cite this article: Jalaluddin M, Ramanna PK, Swain M, . Evaluation of Fibrin Clot Interaction with Dental Implant after Different Surface Treatments: An Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(3):276-279.
本研究旨在评估不同表面处理后纤维蛋白凝块与牙种植体的相互作用。
本研究使用了 45 个长度为 16 毫米、直径为 5 毫米的牙种植体。它们被分为三组，每组 15 个样本。组 I：对照组；组 II：紫外线（UV）光处理组；组 III：喷砂酸蚀（SLA）处理组。健康志愿者的静脉血样被抽入无抗凝剂的 vacutainer 管中。样本在台式离心机中以 2700rpm 的速度离心 3 分钟。将整个种植体完全浸入室温液态纤维蛋白原中 60 分钟。然后，使用扫描电子显微镜（SEM）检查每个样本。使用曼-惠特尼 U 检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验进行组间和组内评估； < 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
在 SLA 处理组中发现纤维蛋白凝块的最大粘附力（2.42 ± 0.10），其次是 UV 光处理组（2.18 ± 0.08）和对照组（1.20 ± 0.02）。三组表面处理组之间存在统计学显著差异（ < 0.001）。
所有表面处理方法都显示出种植体表面与纤维蛋白凝块之间的粘附。然而，与 UV 光处理组和对照组相比，SLA 处理组的纤维蛋白凝块粘附力最高。
种植体表面的物理和化学特性对血凝块的形成方式有重大影响。在种植体和骨之间的界面处，血凝块的产生可以启动和促进愈合过程。
Jalaluddin M, Ramanna PK, Swain M,. 评价不同表面处理后纤维蛋白凝块与牙种植体的相互作用：一项 研究。J 当代牙种植实践 2024；25（3）：276-279。
