Suppr超能文献

便携式压力板能否替代测力板来测量安静站立平衡控制的姿势稳定性和肢体间协调性?

Is a portable pressure plate an alternative to force plates for measuring postural stability and interlimb coordination of quiet standing balance control?

作者信息

Schröder Jonas, Hallemans Ann, Saeys Wim, Yperzeele Laetitia, Kwakkel Gert, Truijen Steven

机构信息

Research Group (MOVANT), Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.

REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.

出版信息

J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2024 Mar 4;11:20556683241234858. doi: 10.1177/20556683241234858. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Center-of-pressure (COP) synchronization and symmetry can inform adaptations in balance control following one-sided sensorimotor impairments (e.g., stroke). As established force plates are impossible to transport, we aimed to criterion validate a portable pressure plate for obtaining reliable COP synchronization and symmetry measures, next to conventional postural stability measures.

METHODS

Twenty healthy adults participated. In a single session, three 40-s eyes-open and eyes-closed quiet stance trials were performed per plate-type, randomly ordered. Individual-limb COPs were measured to calculate between-limb synchronization (BLS) and dynamic control asymmetry (DCA). Net COP (i.e., limbs combined) area, amplitude, and velocity were used to describe anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) postural stability. Criterion validity was evaluated using Spearman correlations (r) and Bland-Altman plots. Test-retest reliability was tested using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

RESULTS

Strong correlations (r > 0.75) and acceptable reliability (ICC > 0.80) were found regarding individual-limb COP velocity and DCA, net COP ML amplitude and AP and ML velocities. Bland-Altman plots yielded possible proportional bias; the pressure plate systematically underestimated COP scores by force plates and a larger error associated with a larger measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite correlations between instruments and sufficient reliability for measuring postural stability and DCA, this technical note strongly suggests, due to a systematic deviation, using the same plate-type to accurately assess performance change subjects longitudinally over time.

摘要

引言

压力中心(COP)同步性和对称性可为单侧感觉运动障碍(如中风)后平衡控制的适应性提供信息。由于传统测力台无法运输,我们旨在对一种便携式压力板进行标准验证,以获得可靠的COP同步性和对称性测量结果,以及传统的姿势稳定性测量结果。

方法

20名健康成年人参与研究。在单次实验中,每种压力板类型均进行三次40秒的睁眼和闭眼安静站立试验,试验顺序随机。测量单肢COP以计算肢体间同步性(BLS)和动态控制不对称性(DCA)。净COP(即双下肢合并)面积、幅度和速度用于描述前后(AP)和内外侧(ML)姿势稳定性。使用Spearman相关性(r)和Bland-Altman图评估标准效度。使用组内相关系数(ICC)测试重测信度。

结果

在单肢COP速度和DCA、净COP ML幅度以及AP和ML速度方面发现了强相关性(r>0.75)和可接受的信度(ICC>0.80)。Bland-Altman图显示可能存在比例偏差;压力板系统地低估了测力台测得的COP分数,且测量值越大误差越大。

结论

尽管两种仪器之间存在相关性,且在测量姿势稳定性和DCA方面具有足够的信度,但由于存在系统偏差,本技术说明强烈建议使用同一种压力板类型,以便随时间纵向准确评估受试者的性能变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0f9/11061883/526914356068/10.1177_20556683241234858-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验