Brazilian Centre for Evidence-Based Research (COBE), Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
School of Dentistry, Universidad De Las Américas (UDLA), Quito, Ecuador.
PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0302049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302049. eCollection 2024.
With the growing popularity of clear aligners, more patients have chosen to use them instead of traditional orthodontic braces to correct their malocclusions. Clear aligners offer distinct advantages over conventional fixed braces, such as limited aesthetic impact, the convenience of easily removing them for meals, improved accessibility for brushing and flossing, and a treatment approach that avoids the use of metal, minimizing potential irritation to the cheeks and gums. Manufacturers point out a disadvantage that can be administered in this type of treatment. Still, to our knowledge, a comprehensive review of the published literature assessing the adverse/negative effects of clear aligners has not yet been conducted. A systematic review, with or without meta-analysis, will be performed. The inclusion criteria will be studies involving individuals using clear aligners and reporting potential adverse/negative effects during or after treatment. No restrictions about time or language will be applied. The studies screening will be conducted in two stages. Two independent reviewers will initially evaluate the title and abstract under the eligibility criteria. Subsequently, the same two reviewers will examine the articles' full text in-depth. The results will be synthesized in the form of a narrative description and incorporate a meta-analysis if justified. Furthermore, we will present details regarding the sample characteristics, intervention, study objectives, methodologies employed, and primary findings. This study aims to investigate the potential adverse effects and their frequency among orthodontic patients wearing clear aligners. Moreover, the outcomes of this review have the potential to illuminate specific inherent limitations of aligner therapy as a comprehensive orthodontic approach.
随着隐形矫正器的日益普及,越来越多的患者选择使用隐形矫正器来矫正他们的错颌畸形,而不是传统的正畸牙套。隐形矫正器相对于传统固定牙套有明显的优势,例如美观影响较小、便于在进食时轻松取下、刷牙和使用牙线更加方便,以及治疗方法避免使用金属材料,从而最大程度减少对脸颊和牙龈的潜在刺激。制造商指出了这种治疗方法的一个缺点。然而,据我们所知,尚未对评估隐形矫正器不良/负面效应的已发表文献进行全面综述。将进行系统评价,无论是否进行荟萃分析。纳入标准为使用隐形矫正器并报告治疗期间或治疗后潜在不良/负面效应的个体的研究。不限制时间或语言。研究筛选将分两个阶段进行。两名独立评审员将根据资格标准初步评估标题和摘要。随后,同两名评审员将深入审查文章的全文。结果将以叙述性描述的形式进行综合,并在合理的情况下进行荟萃分析。此外,我们将介绍样本特征、干预措施、研究目标、所采用的方法以及主要发现的详细信息。本研究旨在调查佩戴隐形矫正器的正畸患者的潜在不良影响及其频率。此外,该综述的结果有可能阐明作为一种综合正畸方法的矫正器治疗的具体内在局限性。