Suppr超能文献

美国 2020 年工作年龄段成年人的州 COVID-19 政策与药物过量死亡率。

State COVID-19 Policies and Drug Overdose Mortality Among Working-Age Adults in the United States, 2020.

机构信息

Douglas A. Wolf, Emily E. Wiemers, Yue Sun, and Jennifer Karas Montez are with the Aging Studies Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY. Shannon M. Monnat and Xue Zhang are with the Lerner Center for Public Health Promotion and Population Health, Syracuse University. Elyse R. Grossman is with the Epidemiology Research Branch, US National Institute on Drug Abuse, Gaithersburg, MD.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2024 Jul;114(7):714-722. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307621. Epub 2024 May 2.

Abstract

To identify relationships between US states' COVID-19 in-person activity limitation and economic support policies and drug overdose deaths among working-age adults in 2020. We used county-level data on 140 435 drug overdoses among adults aged 25 to 64 years during January 2019 to December 2020 from the National Vital Statistics System and data on states' COVID-19 policies from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker to assess US trends in overdose deaths by sex in 3138 counties. Policies limiting in-person activities significantly increased, whereas economic support policies significantly decreased, overdose rates. A 1-unit increase in policies restricting activities predicted a 15% average monthly increase in overdose rates for men (incident rate ratio [IRR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09, 1.20) and a 14% increase for women (IRR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.09, 1.20). A 1-unit increase in economic support policies predicted a 3% average monthly decrease for men (IRR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.95, 1.00) and a 4% decrease for women (IRR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.93, 0.99). All states' policy combinations are predicted to have increased drug-poisoning mortality. The economic supports that states enacted were insufficient to fully mitigate the adverse relationship between activity limitations and drug overdoses. (. 2024;114(7):714-722. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307621).

摘要

为了确定美国各州在 2020 年针对新冠疫情采取的限制人员流动和经济支持政策与 25-64 岁劳动年龄成年人药物过量死亡之间的关系。我们使用了 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间全国生命统计系统中关于 140435 名 25-64 岁成年人药物过量的县级数据,以及牛津大学新冠疫情政府应对追踪器中关于各州新冠疫情政策的数据,评估了 3138 个县中按性别划分的美国药物过量死亡趋势。限制人员流动的政策显著增加,而经济支持政策显著减少了药物过量率。活动限制政策每增加 1 个单位,男性的药物过量率就会平均每月增加 15%(发病率比 [IRR] = 1.15;95%置信区间 [CI] = 1.09,1.20),女性的药物过量率增加 14%(IRR = 1.14;95% CI = 1.09,1.20)。经济支持政策每增加 1 个单位,男性的药物过量率就会平均每月下降 3%(IRR = 0.97;95% CI = 0.95,1.00),女性的药物过量率下降 4%(IRR = 0.96;95% CI = 0.93,0.99)。所有州的政策组合都预计会增加药物中毒死亡率。各州颁布的经济支持措施不足以完全缓解活动限制和药物过量之间的不利关系。(. 2024;114(7):714-722. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307621)。

相似文献

1
State COVID-19 Policies and Drug Overdose Mortality Among Working-Age Adults in the United States, 2020.
Am J Public Health. 2024 Jul;114(7):714-722. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307621. Epub 2024 May 2.
4
Overdose deaths before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a US county.
Front Public Health. 2024 May 27;12:1366161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1366161. eCollection 2024.
6
Systematic Evaluation of State Policy Interventions Targeting the US Opioid Epidemic, 2007-2018.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036687. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36687.
7
Association of Medicaid Expansion With Opioid Overdose Mortality in the United States.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919066. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19066.
8
10
Drug overdose and child maltreatment across the United States' rural-urban continuum.
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Dec;86:358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

2
Methods Used to Evaluate the Health Effects of Social Policies: A Systematic Review.
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12. doi: 10.1007/s40471-024-00356-0. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
3
States' COVID-19 policy contexts and suicide rates among US working-age adults.
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Mar 15;3(3):qxaf024. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Stability and Volatility in the Contextual Predictors of Working-Age Mortality in the United States.
J Health Soc Behav. 2024 Sep 13:221465241271072. doi: 10.1177/00221465241271072.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of social distancing policy on labor market outcomes.
Contemp Econ Policy. 2023 Jan;41(1):166-193. doi: 10.1111/coep.12582. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
2
U.S. States' COVID-19 physical distancing policies and working-age adult mental health outcomes.
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 18;35:102370. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102370. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Factors limiting US public health emergency authority during COVID-19.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 Sep;38(5):1569-1582. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3694. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
4
Demographic and Geographic Variation in Fatal Drug Overdoses in the United States, 1999-2020.
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2022 Sep;703(1):50-78. doi: 10.1177/00027162231154348. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
6
Trends in US State Public Health Emergency Laws, 2021-2022.
Am J Public Health. 2023 Mar;113(3):288-296. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307214.
7
Political Economy of the COVID-19 Pandemic: How State Policies Shape County-Level Disparities in COVID-19 Deaths.
Socius. 2023 Feb 1;9:23780231221149902. doi: 10.1177/23780231221149902. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
The U.S. COVID-19 County Policy Database: a novel resource to support pandemic-related research.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):1882. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14132-6.
9
Trends in Filled Naloxone Prescriptions Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 May 14;2(5):e210393. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0393. eCollection 2021 May.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验