• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
State COVID-19 Policies and Drug Overdose Mortality Among Working-Age Adults in the United States, 2020.美国 2020 年工作年龄段成年人的州 COVID-19 政策与药物过量死亡率。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Jul;114(7):714-722. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307621. Epub 2024 May 2.
2
Higher unemployment benefits are associated with reduced drug overdose mortality in the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.更高的失业救济金与美国 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间的药物过量死亡率降低有关。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Aug;130:104522. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104522. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
3
Excess Fatal Overdoses in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic by Geography and Substance Type: March 2020-August 2021.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间按地理位置和物质类型划分的过量致命过量情况:2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 8 月。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Jun;114(6):599-609. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307618.
4
Overdose deaths before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a US county.美国一县新冠大流行前后的过量用药死亡人数。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 27;12:1366161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1366161. eCollection 2024.
5
Association Between Automotive Assembly Plant Closures and Opioid Overdose Mortality in the United States: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.汽车装配厂关闭与美国阿片类药物过量死亡率的关系:双重差分分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):254-262. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5686.
6
Systematic Evaluation of State Policy Interventions Targeting the US Opioid Epidemic, 2007-2018.系统评价针对美国阿片类药物流行的国家政策干预措施,2007-2018 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036687. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36687.
7
Association of Medicaid Expansion With Opioid Overdose Mortality in the United States.美国医疗补助扩张与阿片类药物过量死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919066. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19066.
8
Analysis of Urine Drug Test Results From Substance Use Disorder Treatment Practices and Overdose Mortality Rates, 2013-2020.2013-2020 年物质使用障碍治疗实践和过量死亡率的尿液药物检测结果分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215425. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15425.
9
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.评估 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日美国各州的 COVID-19 大流行政策和行为及其经济和教育方面的权衡取舍:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
10
Drug overdose and child maltreatment across the United States' rural-urban continuum.全美农村-城市连续体中的药物过量和儿童虐待。
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Dec;86:358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
County-Level COVID-19 Policy Comprehensiveness and Adult Behavioral Health during 2021 : County-Level COVID-19 Policy and Adult Behavioral Health.2021年县级新冠疫情政策的全面性与成人行为健康:县级新冠疫情政策与成人行为健康
J Urban Health. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s11524-025-00982-z.
2
Methods Used to Evaluate the Health Effects of Social Policies: A Systematic Review.用于评估社会政策健康影响的方法:一项系统综述。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12. doi: 10.1007/s40471-024-00356-0. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
3
States' COVID-19 policy contexts and suicide rates among US working-age adults.美国各州的新冠疫情政策背景与美国劳动年龄成年人的自杀率
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Mar 15;3(3):qxaf024. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Stability and Volatility in the Contextual Predictors of Working-Age Mortality in the United States.美国劳动年龄人口死亡率背景预测因素中的稳定性与波动性
J Health Soc Behav. 2024 Sep 13:221465241271072. doi: 10.1177/00221465241271072.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of social distancing policy on labor market outcomes.社交距离政策对劳动力市场结果的影响。
Contemp Econ Policy. 2023 Jan;41(1):166-193. doi: 10.1111/coep.12582. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
2
U.S. States' COVID-19 physical distancing policies and working-age adult mental health outcomes.美国各州的新冠疫情社交距离政策与劳动年龄成年人的心理健康状况
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 18;35:102370. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102370. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Factors limiting US public health emergency authority during COVID-19.限制美国在 COVID-19 期间公共卫生紧急事件权力的因素。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 Sep;38(5):1569-1582. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3694. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
4
Demographic and Geographic Variation in Fatal Drug Overdoses in the United States, 1999-2020.1999 - 2020年美国致命药物过量的人口统计学和地理差异
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2022 Sep;703(1):50-78. doi: 10.1177/00027162231154348. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
5
Assessing COVID-19 pandemic policies and behaviours and their economic and educational trade-offs across US states from Jan 1, 2020, to July 31, 2022: an observational analysis.评估 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 31 日美国各州的 COVID-19 大流行政策和行为及其经济和教育方面的权衡取舍:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2023 Apr 22;401(10385):1341-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00461-0. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
6
Trends in US State Public Health Emergency Laws, 2021-2022.2021-2022 年美国州公共卫生紧急法的趋势。
Am J Public Health. 2023 Mar;113(3):288-296. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307214.
7
Political Economy of the COVID-19 Pandemic: How State Policies Shape County-Level Disparities in COVID-19 Deaths.新冠疫情的政治经济学:国家政策如何塑造各县新冠死亡人数的差异
Socius. 2023 Feb 1;9:23780231221149902. doi: 10.1177/23780231221149902. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
The U.S. COVID-19 County Policy Database: a novel resource to support pandemic-related research.美国 COVID-19 县政策数据库:支持大流行相关研究的新型资源。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):1882. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14132-6.
9
Trends in Filled Naloxone Prescriptions Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.美国 COVID-19 大流行前后阿片类药物纳洛酮处方的变化趋势。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 May 14;2(5):e210393. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0393. eCollection 2021 May.
10
Urban-Rural Differences in Drug Overdose Death Rates, 2020.城乡地区药物过量死亡率差异,2020 年。
NCHS Data Brief. 2022 Jul(440):1-8.

美国 2020 年工作年龄段成年人的州 COVID-19 政策与药物过量死亡率。

State COVID-19 Policies and Drug Overdose Mortality Among Working-Age Adults in the United States, 2020.

机构信息

Douglas A. Wolf, Emily E. Wiemers, Yue Sun, and Jennifer Karas Montez are with the Aging Studies Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY. Shannon M. Monnat and Xue Zhang are with the Lerner Center for Public Health Promotion and Population Health, Syracuse University. Elyse R. Grossman is with the Epidemiology Research Branch, US National Institute on Drug Abuse, Gaithersburg, MD.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2024 Jul;114(7):714-722. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307621. Epub 2024 May 2.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307621
PMID:38696735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11153954/
Abstract

To identify relationships between US states' COVID-19 in-person activity limitation and economic support policies and drug overdose deaths among working-age adults in 2020. We used county-level data on 140 435 drug overdoses among adults aged 25 to 64 years during January 2019 to December 2020 from the National Vital Statistics System and data on states' COVID-19 policies from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker to assess US trends in overdose deaths by sex in 3138 counties. Policies limiting in-person activities significantly increased, whereas economic support policies significantly decreased, overdose rates. A 1-unit increase in policies restricting activities predicted a 15% average monthly increase in overdose rates for men (incident rate ratio [IRR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09, 1.20) and a 14% increase for women (IRR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.09, 1.20). A 1-unit increase in economic support policies predicted a 3% average monthly decrease for men (IRR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.95, 1.00) and a 4% decrease for women (IRR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.93, 0.99). All states' policy combinations are predicted to have increased drug-poisoning mortality. The economic supports that states enacted were insufficient to fully mitigate the adverse relationship between activity limitations and drug overdoses. (. 2024;114(7):714-722. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307621).

摘要

为了确定美国各州在 2020 年针对新冠疫情采取的限制人员流动和经济支持政策与 25-64 岁劳动年龄成年人药物过量死亡之间的关系。我们使用了 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间全国生命统计系统中关于 140435 名 25-64 岁成年人药物过量的县级数据,以及牛津大学新冠疫情政府应对追踪器中关于各州新冠疫情政策的数据,评估了 3138 个县中按性别划分的美国药物过量死亡趋势。限制人员流动的政策显著增加,而经济支持政策显著减少了药物过量率。活动限制政策每增加 1 个单位,男性的药物过量率就会平均每月增加 15%(发病率比 [IRR] = 1.15;95%置信区间 [CI] = 1.09,1.20),女性的药物过量率增加 14%(IRR = 1.14;95% CI = 1.09,1.20)。经济支持政策每增加 1 个单位,男性的药物过量率就会平均每月下降 3%(IRR = 0.97;95% CI = 0.95,1.00),女性的药物过量率下降 4%(IRR = 0.96;95% CI = 0.93,0.99)。所有州的政策组合都预计会增加药物中毒死亡率。各州颁布的经济支持措施不足以完全缓解活动限制和药物过量之间的不利关系。(. 2024;114(7):714-722. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307621)。