Zhou Xiaoling, Ye Jianhua, Guo Xiaoyan, Chen Menghua
Nephrology Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Yinchuan, Ningxia, 750004, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 10;10(8):e29488. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29488. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
At present, there remains controversy regarding the clinical efficacy of Corbrin (Bailing) capsules in the treatment of renal insufficiency (RI). A meta-analytic approach was adopted in this study to assess the clinical efficacy of Corbrin capsules for treating RI, aiming to provide a certain level of clinical evidence to guide the selection of RI therapeutic interventions.
The meta-analysis was conducted on databases containing PubMed, CNKI, Weipu Database, Cochrane Library and Wanfang until January 2023. The search for relevant studies was conducted without language restrictions. The study encompassed a randomized controlled trial that examined the efficacy of Corbrin capsules in treating RI. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (Scr), 24-h urine protein quantity (24 h UPQ), and estimated creatinine clearance (ECC) were amalgamated using standardized mean difference (SMD) and its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (CI). Meanwhile, the treatment effect (TE) outcome was aggregated using odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95 % CI. To evaluate heterogeneity, the Q test and I statistics were employed within a random-effects model framework.
A total of 11 eligible articles were included, involving 1100 patients (594 in the Corbrin capsule group and 516 in the control group). Compared with control subjects, the SMD was-1.3532 for Ser (95 % CI: 2.0617 to -0.6448), -1.7868 for UPQ (95 % CI: 2.8901 to -0.6836), -1.3302 for BUN (95 % CI: 2.2428 to -0.4176), and 1.7842 for ECC (95 % CI: 0.6774-2.8910). TE had an OR of 1.9786 (95 % CI: 0.7153-5.4734), and publications were not found to be biased (t = 0.5627, = 0.6738).
In RI patients, Corbrin capsule has a relatively good therapeutic effect.
目前,百令胶囊治疗肾功能不全(RI)的临床疗效仍存在争议。本研究采用荟萃分析方法评估百令胶囊治疗RI的临床疗效,旨在提供一定的临床证据以指导RI治疗干预措施的选择。
对截至2023年1月的PubMed、中国知网、维普数据库、Cochrane图书馆和万方数据库进行荟萃分析。不限语言进行相关研究检索。该研究纳入了一项检验百令胶囊治疗RI疗效的随机对照试验。采用标准化均数差(SMD)及其相应的95%置信区间(CI)合并血尿素氮(BUN)、血清肌酐(Scr)、24小时尿蛋白量(24 h UPQ)和估计肌酐清除率(ECC)。同时,采用比值比(OR)及其相应的95% CI汇总治疗效果(TE)结果。为评估异质性,在随机效应模型框架内采用Q检验和I统计量。
共纳入11篇合格文章,涉及1100例患者(百令胶囊组594例,对照组516例)。与对照组相比,Scr的SMD为-1.3532(95% CI:-2.0617至-0.6448),UPQ为-1.7868(95% CI:-2.8901至-0.6836),BUN为-1.3302(95% CI:-2.2428至-0.4176),ECC为1.7842(95% CI:0.6774 - 2.8910)。TE的OR为1.9786(95% CI:0.7153 - 5.4734),未发现发表偏倚(t = 0.5627,P = 0.6738)。
在RI患者中,百令胶囊具有较好的治疗效果。