Suppr超能文献

益肾化湿颗粒联合常规疗法治疗糖尿病肾病的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Efficacy and safety of Yishen Huashi granules combined with conventional therapy in the treatment of diabetic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Dai Bo, Chen Yanxu, Song Chaoqun, Liu Shilin, Chen Jinying, Zhu Zexin, Xu Jian, Liu Zhenru, Lin Minghao, Yang Huhu, Xu Shengxian, Bao Pengjie, Nan Zheng

机构信息

Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.

The Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Oct 11;10(20):e39213. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39213. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.

Abstract

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Diabetic kidney disease(DKD) is a complication of diabetes. If not treated in time, it will lead to severe glomerular damage, causing irreversible damage, and ultimately may lead to uremia and even death. Yishen Huashi Granule (YSHS) is a Chinese patent medicine for treating DKD by invigorating the spleen and removing dampness, which has shown a good curative effect.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This study systematically evaluated the clinical efficacy and blood biochemical improvement of YSHS combined with conventional therapy (CT) in treating DKD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

By August 2024, four English databases (PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase) and four Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database (WF), China Biological Medicine Database (CBM), and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP)) were searched to screen literature, extract information, and evaluate quality according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The language of these literature is limited to Chinese and English, but not limited to published sources. Meta-analysis and bias analysis were performed using Steata 16 software and Review Manager 5.3 software. The bias risk tool in the Cochrane Handbook was used to assess the quality of the literature. At 95 % confidence interval (CI), relative risk (RR) and Cohen's d were used for the categorical and continuous variables, respectively. To evaluate heterogeneity, the Q test and I statistics were employed within a random-effects model framework.

RESULTS

A total of 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 2416 patients were included in this study. There were 1200 patients in the control group and 1216 in the treatment group. Compared with CT, combined YSHS therapy is more effective at improving clinical efficiency rate [RR(95 % confidence interval (CI)) = 1.26(1.21, 1.32), I = 15.83 %], renal function (urinary albumin excretion rate [SMD(95%CI) = -1.72(-2.27, -1.17), I = 95.5 %], 24-h quantitative urine protein level [SMD(95%CI) = -1.50(-2.51, -0.50), I = 95.52 %], blood urea nitrogen [SMD(95%CI) = -1.13(-1.46, -0.81), I = 89.81 %], SCr [SMD(95%CI) = -2.34(-3.36, -1.32), I = 97.90 %], eGFR [SMD(95%CI) = 0.50(0.18,0.82), I = 51.51 %]), glucose metabolism levels (FBG [SMD(95%CI) = -0.50(-0.87, -0.14), I = 89.67 %], 2hPG [SMD(95%CI) = -0.83(-1.39, -0.26), I = 87.11 %], HbA1c [SMD(95%CI) = -0.79(-1.74, -0.15), I = 94.6 %]), lipid metabolism levels (TC [SMD(95%CI) = -1.53(-2.32, -0.75), I = 95.49 %], TG [SMD(95%CI) = -0.96(-1.08, -0.77), I = 86.05 %], LDL-C [SMD(95%CI) = -1.25(-1.81, -0.69), I = 90.56 %], HDL-C [SMD(95%CI) = 0.71(0.43, 0.98), I = 55.92 %]), oxidative stress indicators (SOD [SMD(95%CI) = 6.00(2.77, 9.24, I = 99.01 %], MDA [SMD(95%CI) = -2.81(-3.58, -2.05), I = 89.64 %]), ALB [SMD(95%CI) = 1.01(0.63, -1.39), I = 68.89 %], vWF [SMD(95%CI) = -0.84(-1.08, -0.60), I = 0 %], ET-1 [SMD(95%CI) = -0.89(-1.13, -0.65), I = 0 %], and MAP [SMD(95%CI) = -1.76(-3.26, -0.25), I = 94.05 %]. The incidence of adverse reactions in YSHS combination therapy was not high [SMD(95%CI) = 0.99(0.97, 1.02), I = 0.03 %].

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis revealed that YSHS combined with CT therapy is superior to CT in improving clinical outcomes, renal function, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, and oxidative stress. Yishen Huashi granules is more effective and safer for Diabetic kidney disease treatment.

摘要

民族药理学相关性

糖尿病肾病(DKD)是糖尿病的一种并发症。若不及时治疗,将导致严重的肾小球损伤,造成不可逆转的损害,最终可能导致尿毒症甚至死亡。益肾化湿颗粒(YSHS)是一种通过健脾祛湿治疗DKD的中成药,已显示出良好的疗效。

研究目的

本研究系统评价了YSHS联合常规治疗(CT)在治疗DKD中的临床疗效和血液生化改善情况。

材料与方法

截至2024年8月,检索了四个英文数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和Embase)和四个中文数据库(中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库(WF)、中国生物医学数据库(CBM)和中国科技期刊数据库(VIP)),以筛选文献、提取信息,并根据纳入和排除标准评估质量。这些文献的语言限于中文和英文,但不限于已发表的来源。使用Steata 16软件和Review Manager 5.3软件进行荟萃分析和偏倚分析。采用Cochrane手册中的偏倚风险工具评估文献质量。在95%置信区间(CI)下,分别使用相对风险(RR)和Cohen's d对分类变量和连续变量进行分析。为评估异质性,在随机效应模型框架内采用Q检验和I统计量。

结果

本研究共纳入28项随机对照试验(RCT),涉及2416例患者。对照组有1200例患者,治疗组有1216例患者。与CT相比,YSHS联合治疗在提高临床有效率[RR(95%置信区间(CI))=1.26(1.21,1.32),I=15.83%]、肾功能(尿白蛋白排泄率[SMD(95%CI)=-1.72(-2.27,-1.17),I=95.5%]、24小时尿蛋白定量水平[SMD(95%CI)=-1.50(-2.51,-0.50),I=95.52%]、血尿素氮[SMD(95%CI)=-1.13(-1.46,-0.81),I=89.81%]、SCr[SMD(95%CI)=-2.34(-3.36,-1.32),I=97.90%]、eGFR[SMD(95%CI)=0.50(0.18,0.82),I=51.51%])、糖代谢水平(空腹血糖[SMD(95%CI)=-0.50(-0.87,-0.14),I=89.67%]、餐后2小时血糖[SMD(95%CI)=-0.83(-1.39,-0.26),I=87.11%]、糖化血红蛋白[SMD(95%CI)=-0.79(-1.74,-0.15),I=94.6%])、脂代谢水平(总胆固醇[SMD(95%CI)=-1.53(-2.32,-0.75),I=95.49%]、甘油三酯[SMD(95%CI)=-0.96(-1.08,-0.77),I=86.05%]、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇[SMD(95%CI)=-1.25(-1.81,-0.69),I=90.56%]、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇[SMD(95%CI)=0.71(0.43,0.98),I=55.92%])、氧化应激指标(超氧化物歧化酶[SMD(95%CI)=6.00(2.77,9.24,I=99.01%]、丙二醛[SMD(95%CI)=-2.81(-3.58,-2.05),I=89.64%])、白蛋白[SMD(95%CI)=1.01(0.63,-1.39),I=68.89%]、血管性血友病因子[SMD(95%CI)=-0.84(-1.08,-0.60),I=0%]、内皮素-1[SMD(95%CI)=-0.89(-1.13,-0.65),I=0%]和平均动脉压[SMD(95%CI)=-1.76(-3.26,-0.25),I=94.05%]方面更有效。YSHS联合治疗的不良反应发生率不高[SMD(95%CI)=0.99(0.97,1.02),I=0.03%]。

结论

荟萃分析表明,YSHS联合CT治疗在改善临床结局、肾功能、糖代谢、脂代谢和氧化应激方面优于CT。益肾化湿颗粒治疗糖尿病肾病更有效且更安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e8/11532249/771479d02809/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验