Universidad Adventista de Chile, Chillán city, Nuble, Chile.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Sep;58(3):807-811. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09844-w. Epub 2024 May 4.
This article addresses the implications of ´Understanding the process of Taoistic-informed mindfulness from a Meadian perspective´, a work by von Fircks (2023) published in this journal, which represents a vindication of the historic, philosophic, and subjective dimensions of research in psychology. From my perspective as an indigenous researcher, I share my own experience of how deceitful distinctions between more or less scientific research topics are fostered by the omission of those dimensions. I also introduce the indigenous understanding of well-being to emphasize the relational nature of this phenomenon and similarities with some conclusions arising from the autoethnographic approach of the author. Moreover, the trivialization of well-being and epistemic violence toward the indigenous corpus of knowledge are signaled as consequences of reductionism in psychological research and the pursuit of scientific status. In this vein, the lack of a critical perspective in psychology is considered functional to the order in which possibilities for well-being are seriously constrained.
本文探讨了 von Fircks（2023）在本刊发表的文章《从米德视角理解受道家启发的正念的过程》所带来的影响，该文捍卫了心理学研究的历史、哲学和主观维度。作为一名本土研究者，我分享了自己的经验，即通过忽略这些维度，如何在更多或更少的科学研究主题之间制造出欺骗性的区分。我还介绍了本土对幸福的理解，以强调这种现象的关系本质以及与作者的自传体方法得出的一些结论的相似性。此外，幸福感的贬低和对本土知识体系的认识论暴力被视为心理学研究中的还原论和对科学地位的追求的后果。在此背景下，心理学缺乏批判性观点被认为是对幸福感的可能性受到严重限制的秩序的一种功能。
