Bashir Zubair S, Misquith Chelsea, Has Phinnara, Bukhari Syed M
Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, USA.
School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 3;16(4):e57557. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57557. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Cardiac procedure-related anxiety and pain can adversely affect outcomes and lead to patient dissatisfaction. Virtual reality (VR) offers a promising alternative to traditional therapies for improving patient experience. Our objective is to synthesize evidence and assess the effectiveness of VR in reducing cardiac procedure-related anxiety and pain compared to standard of care. We conducted a comprehensive search across various online databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, and COCHRANE, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on VR, cardiac procedures, anxiety, and pain. We utilized a random-effect model to generate effect estimates reported as standardized mean differences (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval. Our review comprised 10 studies with a total of 621 participants (intervention arm: 301, control arm: 320). Overall, among the seven studies evaluating anxiety outcomes, no significant difference in anxiety reduction was observed between the intervention and control groups (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.62, 95% CI -1.61, 0.37, p=0.22). However, studies using the same anxiety assessment tool demonstrated a significant improvement in the VR arm (SMD -1.01, 95% CI -1.98, -0.04, p=0.04). Conversely, the narrative synthesis of four studies examining pain revealed mixed results. Our findings suggest no significant difference in anxiety reduction between the VR and control groups. Future studies should employ standardized tools for assessing and reporting anxiety and pain to better understand the potential of VR in enhancing patient experience during cardiac procedures.
心脏手术相关的焦虑和疼痛会对手术结果产生不利影响,并导致患者不满。虚拟现实(VR)为改善患者体验提供了一种有前景的替代传统疗法的方法。我们的目标是综合证据,评估与标准护理相比,VR在减轻心脏手术相关焦虑和疼痛方面的有效性。我们在包括MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Web of Sciences和COCHRANE在内的各种在线数据库中进行了全面搜索,以识别关注VR、心脏手术、焦虑和疼痛的相关随机对照试验(RCT)。我们使用随机效应模型生成以标准化平均差(SMD)报告的效应估计值,并带有95%置信区间。我们的综述包括10项研究,共有621名参与者(干预组:301名,对照组:320名)。总体而言,在评估焦虑结果的7项研究中,干预组和对照组在焦虑减轻方面未观察到显著差异(标准化平均差(SMD)-0.62,95%置信区间-1.61,0.37,p = 0.22)。然而,使用相同焦虑评估工具的研究表明VR组有显著改善(SMD -1.01,95%置信区间-1.98,-0.04,p = 0.04)。相反,对4项研究疼痛的叙述性综合分析结果不一。我们的研究结果表明VR组和对照组在焦虑减轻方面没有显著差异。未来的研究应采用标准化工具来评估和报告焦虑和疼痛,以便更好地了解VR在增强心脏手术期间患者体验方面的潜力。