Shah Sameer H, Harris Leila M, Menghwani Vikas, Stoler Justin, Brewis Alexandra, Miller Joshua D, Workman Cassandra L, Adams Ellis Adjei, Pearson Amber L, Hagaman Ashley, Wutich Amber, Young Sera L
University of Washington, USA; The University of British Columbia, Canada.
The University of British Columbia, Canada.
Environ Plan F Philos Theory Models Method Pract. 2023 Sep;2(3):369-398. doi: 10.1177/26349825231156900. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
Compounding systems of marginalization differentiate and shape water-related risks. Yet, quantitative water security scholarship rarely assesses such risks through intersectionality, a paradigm that conceptualizes and examines racial, gendered, class, and other oppressions as interdependent. Using an intersectionality approach, we analyze the relationships between household head gender and self-reported socio-economic status, and water affordability (proportion of monthly income spent on water) and water insecurity (a composite measure of 11 self-reported experiences) for over 4000 households across 18 low- and middle-income countries in Central and South America, Africa, and Asia. Interaction terms and composite categorical variables were included in regression models, adjusting for putative confounders. Among households with a high socio-economic status, the proportion of monthly income spent on water differed by household head gender. In contrast, greater household water insecurity was associated with lower socio-economic status and did not meaningfully vary by the gender of the household head. We contextualize and interpret these experiences through larger systems of power and privilege. Overall, our results provide evidence of broad intersectional patterns from diverse sites, while indicating that their nature and magnitude depend on local contexts. Through a critical reflection on the study's value and limitations, including the operationalization of social contexts across different sites, we propose methodological approaches to advance multi-sited and quantitative intersectional research on water affordability and water insecurity. These approaches include developing scale-appropriate models, analyzing complementarities and differences between site-specific and multi-sited data, collecting data on gendered power relations, and measuring the impacts of household water insecurity.
边缘化的复合系统区分并塑造了与水相关的风险。然而,定量水安全学术研究很少通过交叉性理论来评估此类风险,交叉性理论将种族、性别、阶级和其他压迫概念化为相互依存的关系并进行审视。我们采用交叉性方法,分析了中美洲、南美洲、非洲和亚洲18个低收入和中等收入国家4000多个家庭的户主性别与自我报告的社会经济地位、水可承受性(每月收入中用于水的比例)和水不安全状况(11种自我报告经历的综合指标)之间的关系。回归模型中纳入了交互项和复合分类变量,并对假定的混杂因素进行了调整。在社会经济地位较高的家庭中,每月收入中用于水的比例因户主性别而异。相比之下,家庭水不安全程度越高与社会经济地位越低相关,且与户主性别没有显著差异。我们通过更大的权力和特权系统来将这些经历置于情境中并进行解读。总体而言,我们的结果为来自不同地点的广泛交叉模式提供了证据,同时表明其性质和程度取决于当地情况。通过对该研究的价值和局限性进行批判性反思,包括不同地点社会背景的操作化,我们提出了推进关于水可承受性和水不安全的多地点定量交叉研究的方法。这些方法包括开发适合规模的模型、分析特定地点和多地点数据之间的互补性和差异、收集关于性别权力关系的数据,以及衡量家庭水不安全的影响。