Suppr超能文献

比较全麻鼻内镜手术后苏醒期躁动中瑞马唑仑与地氟醚的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。

Comparison of remimazolam and desflurane in emergence agitation after general anesthesia for nasal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

Myunggok Medical Research Center, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2024 Aug;77(4):432-440. doi: 10.4097/kja.23953. Epub 2024 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine. Few studies have evaluated the effects of remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on emergence agitation (EA). This study aimed to compare the incidence and severity of EA between TIVA using remimazolam and desflurane.

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled study enrolled 76 patients who underwent nasal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized into two groups of 38 each: desflurane-nitrous oxide (N2O) (DN) and remimazolam-remifentanil (RR) groups. The same protocol was used for each group from induction to emergence, except for the use of different anesthetics during maintenance of anesthesia according to the assigned group: desflurane and nitrous oxide for the DN group and remimazolam and remifentanil for the RR group. The incidence of EA as the primary outcome was evaluated using three scales: Ricker Sedation-Agitation Scale, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, and Aono's four-point agitation scale. Additionally, hemodynamic changes during emergence and postoperative sense of suffocation were compared.

RESULTS

The incidence of EA was significantly lower in the RR group than in the DN group in all three types of EA assessment scales (all P < 0.001). During emergence, the change in heart rate differed between the two groups (P = 0.002). The sense of suffocation was lower in the RR group than in the DN group (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

RR reduced the incidence and severity of EA in patients undergoing nasal surgery under general anesthesia. In addition, RR was favorable for managing hemodynamics and postoperative sense of suffocation.

摘要

背景

瑞马唑仑是一种超短效苯二氮䓬类药物。很少有研究评估基于瑞马唑仑的全凭静脉麻醉(TIVA)对苏醒期躁动(EA)的影响。本研究旨在比较瑞马唑仑和地氟醚用于 TIVA 时 EA 的发生率和严重程度。

方法

这是一项前瞻性随机对照研究,纳入了 76 例在全身麻醉下接受鼻手术的患者。患者随机分为两组,每组 38 例:地氟醚-氧化亚氮(N2O)(DN)组和瑞马唑仑-瑞芬太尼(RR)组。两组从诱导到苏醒采用相同的方案,除了根据分组在维持麻醉期间使用不同的麻醉剂:DN 组使用地氟醚和氧化亚氮,RR 组使用瑞马唑仑和瑞芬太尼。EA 的发生率作为主要结局,使用三种量表进行评估:Ricker 镇静-躁动量表、Richmond 躁动-镇静量表和 Aono 的四点躁动量表。此外,比较了苏醒期间的血液动力学变化和术后窒息感。

结果

RR 组在所有三种类型的 EA 评估量表中的 EA 发生率均显著低于 DN 组(均 P <0.001)。在苏醒期间,两组的心率变化不同(P = 0.002)。RR 组的窒息感低于 DN 组(P = 0.027)。

结论

RR 降低了全身麻醉下接受鼻手术患者的 EA 发生率和严重程度。此外,RR 有利于管理血液动力学和术后窒息感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf62/11294877/c10059405201/kja-23953f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验