University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 29605, Greenville, SC, USA.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 29605, Greenville, SC, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 7;24(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05494-z.
Evaluation of students' learning strategies can enhance academic support. Few studies have investigated differences in learning strategies between male and female students as well as their impact on United States Medical Licensing Examination® (USMLE) Step 1 and preclinical performance.
The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) was administered to the classes of 2019-2024 (female (n = 350) and male (n = 262)). Students' performance on preclinical first-year (M1) courses, preclinical second-year (M2) courses, and USMLE Step 1 was recorded. An independent t-test evaluated differences between females and males on each LASSI scale. A Pearson product moment correlation determined which LASSI scales correlated with preclinical performance and USMLE Step 1 examinations.
Of the 10 LASSI scales, Anxiety, Attention, Information Processing, Selecting Main Idea, Test Strategies and Using Academic Resources showed significant differences between genders. Females reported higher levels of Anxiety (p < 0.001), which significantly influenced their performance. While males and females scored similarly in Concentration, Motivation, and Time Management, these scales were significant predictors of performance variation in females. Test Strategies was the largest contributor to performance variation for all students, regardless of gender.
Gender differences in learning influence performance on STEP1. Consideration of this study's results will allow for targeted interventions for academic success.
评估学生的学习策略可以增强学术支持。很少有研究调查男女生学习策略的差异及其对美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步和临床前表现的影响。
2019-2024 年的班级(女性(n=350)和男性(n=262))被要求填写学习和研究策略量表(LASSI)。记录学生在临床前第一年(M1)课程、临床前第二年(M2)课程和 USMLE 第 1 步的表现。独立 t 检验评估了女性和男性在每个 LASSI 量表上的差异。皮尔逊积矩相关确定了哪些 LASSI 量表与临床前表现和 USMLE 第 1 步考试相关。
在 10 个 LASSI 量表中,焦虑、注意力、信息处理、选择主要思想、测试策略和使用学术资源在性别之间存在显著差异。女性报告的焦虑水平更高(p<0.001),这显著影响了她们的表现。尽管男性和女性在注意力、动机和时间管理方面的得分相似,但这些量表是女性表现差异的重要预测因素。测试策略是所有学生表现差异的最大贡献者,无论性别如何。
学习中的性别差异会影响 STEP1 的表现。考虑本研究的结果将允许为学术成功进行有针对性的干预。