• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Gender differences in learning and study strategies impact medical students' preclinical and USMLE step 1 examination performance.学习和研究策略方面的性别差异会影响医学生的基础医学课程和美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步的考试表现。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 7;24(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05494-z.
2
Learning and study strategies correlate with medical students' performance in anatomical sciences.学习和研究策略与医学生在解剖科学中的表现相关。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 May 6;11(3):236-242. doi: 10.1002/ase.1742. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
The Use of Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) to Investigate Differences Between Low vs High Academically Performing Medical Students.使用学习与学习策略量表(LASSI)调查学业表现低与高的医学生之间的差异。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Dec 19;30(1):287-292. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00897-w. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Weekly near-peer tutoring sessions improve students' performance on basic medical sciences and USMLE Step1 examinations.每周的近伴辅导课程可提高学生在基础医学科学和美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步考试中的表现。
Med Teach. 2022 Jul;44(7):752-757. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2027901. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
5
Relationship between students' perceptions of the adequacy of M1 and M2 curricula and their performance on USMLE step 1 examination.学生对 M1 和 M2 课程充足性的认知与他们在美国医师执照考试 (USMLE) 第 1 阶段考试中的表现之间的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Sep 14;19(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1796-3.
6
Examining Demographics, Prior Academic Performance, and United States Medical Licensing Examination Scores.考察人口统计学特征、既往学业表现和美国医师执照考试成绩。
Acad Med. 2019 Mar;94(3):364-370. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002366.
7
Exploring the Predictors of Post-Clerkship USMLE Step 1 Scores.探讨实习后 USMLE 步骤 1 成绩的预测因素。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):330-336. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1721293. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
The association of USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores with residency match specialty and location.美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)和第二步临床知识考试(Step 2 CK)成绩与住院医师匹配专业及地点的关联。
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1358579. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1358579.
9
Using Markov chain model to evaluate medical students' trajectory on progress tests and predict USMLE step 1 scores---a retrospective cohort study in one medical school.使用马尔可夫链模型评估医学生在阶段性测试中的进展轨迹并预测美国医师执照考试第一步的成绩——一所医学院校的回顾性队列研究
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 9;21(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02633-8.
10
The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 2 scores.二年级医学生客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)成绩与美国医师执照考试第二步(USMLE Step 2)成绩之间的关系。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;13(6):901-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00768.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning motivation among international students: the role of demographic factors.国际学生的学习动机:人口统计学因素的作用。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 12;13(1):908. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03244-4.
2
How does gender influence student learning, stress and career choice in endodontics?性别如何影响牙髓病学专业学生的学习、压力和职业选择?
Int Endod J. 2025 Sep;58(9):1289-1300. doi: 10.1111/iej.14225. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
3
Medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online-only course can achieve good to medium psychomotor skill level of basic head and neck examination.新冠疫情期间的医学教育:一门纯在线课程能够使基本头颈部检查的心理运动技能水平达到中等到良好程度。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 17;10(19):e38044. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38044. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
4
Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of english academic papers by non-native english-speaking medical students - the educational application of ChatGPT.探讨人工智能在提高非英语母语医学专业学生英文学术论文写作能力方面的潜力——ChatGPT 的教育应用。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05738-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Does developing multiple-choice Questions Improve Medical Students' Learning? A Systematic Review.多选题的开发是否能提高医学生的学习效果?系统评价。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2005505. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2005505.
2
Interactive retrieval practice in renal physiology improves performance on customized National Board of Medical Examiners examination of medical students.互动式检索实践在肾脏生理学中提高了医学生对定制国家医学考试委员会考试的表现。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2022 Mar 1;46(1):35-40. doi: 10.1152/advan.00118.2021. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
3
The Use of Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) to Investigate Differences Between Low vs High Academically Performing Medical Students.使用学习与学习策略量表(LASSI)调查学业表现低与高的医学生之间的差异。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Dec 19;30(1):287-292. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00897-w. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Assessing learning styles of medical students using Kolb's learning style inventory and their association with preferred teaching methodologies.评估医学生的学习风格:使用 Kolb 学习风格量表及其与偏好教学方法的关联。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Apr;71(4):1157-1161. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1437.
5
Examining Gender Differences, Personality Traits, Academic Performance, and Motivation in Ukrainian and Polish Students of Physical Education: A Cross-Cultural Study.审视乌克兰和波兰体育教育专业学生的性别差异、人格特质、学业表现和动机:一项跨文化研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 7;17(16):5729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165729.
6
How to Reduce Test Anxiety and Academic Procrastination Through Inquiry of Cognitive Appraisals: A Pilot Study Investigating the Role of Academic Self-Efficacy.如何通过认知评估探究减轻考试焦虑和学业拖延:一项调查学业自我效能作用的初步研究
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 20;10:1917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01917. eCollection 2019.
7
The Global Prevalence of Anxiety Among Medical Students: A Meta-Analysis.医学生焦虑的全球患病率:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 31;16(15):2735. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152735.
8
Impact of a Yoga and Meditation Intervention on Students' Stress and Anxiety Levels.瑜伽和冥想干预对学生压力和焦虑水平的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Jun;83(5):7001. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7001.
9
The effect of study preparation on test anxiety and performance: a quasi-experimental study.学习准备对考试焦虑及成绩的影响:一项准实验研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 May 3;10:245-251. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S192053. eCollection 2019.
10
Anxiety, depression and quality of life of medical students in Malaysia.马来西亚医学生的焦虑、抑郁与生活质量
Med J Malaysia. 2019 Feb;74(1):57-61.

学习和研究策略方面的性别差异会影响医学生的基础医学课程和美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步的考试表现。

Gender differences in learning and study strategies impact medical students' preclinical and USMLE step 1 examination performance.

机构信息

University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 29605, Greenville, SC, USA.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 29605, Greenville, SC, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 7;24(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05494-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-05494-z
PMID:38714975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11077801/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of students' learning strategies can enhance academic support. Few studies have investigated differences in learning strategies between male and female students as well as their impact on United States Medical Licensing Examination® (USMLE) Step 1 and preclinical performance.

METHODS

The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) was administered to the classes of 2019-2024 (female (n = 350) and male (n = 262)). Students' performance on preclinical first-year (M1) courses, preclinical second-year (M2) courses, and USMLE Step 1 was recorded. An independent t-test evaluated differences between females and males on each LASSI scale. A Pearson product moment correlation determined which LASSI scales correlated with preclinical performance and USMLE Step 1 examinations.

RESULTS

Of the 10 LASSI scales, Anxiety, Attention, Information Processing, Selecting Main Idea, Test Strategies and Using Academic Resources showed significant differences between genders. Females reported higher levels of Anxiety (p < 0.001), which significantly influenced their performance. While males and females scored similarly in Concentration, Motivation, and Time Management, these scales were significant predictors of performance variation in females. Test Strategies was the largest contributor to performance variation for all students, regardless of gender.

CONCLUSION

Gender differences in learning influence performance on STEP1. Consideration of this study's results will allow for targeted interventions for academic success.

摘要

背景

评估学生的学习策略可以增强学术支持。很少有研究调查男女生学习策略的差异及其对美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步和临床前表现的影响。

方法

2019-2024 年的班级(女性(n=350)和男性(n=262))被要求填写学习和研究策略量表(LASSI)。记录学生在临床前第一年(M1)课程、临床前第二年(M2)课程和 USMLE 第 1 步的表现。独立 t 检验评估了女性和男性在每个 LASSI 量表上的差异。皮尔逊积矩相关确定了哪些 LASSI 量表与临床前表现和 USMLE 第 1 步考试相关。

结果

在 10 个 LASSI 量表中,焦虑、注意力、信息处理、选择主要思想、测试策略和使用学术资源在性别之间存在显著差异。女性报告的焦虑水平更高(p<0.001),这显著影响了她们的表现。尽管男性和女性在注意力、动机和时间管理方面的得分相似,但这些量表是女性表现差异的重要预测因素。测试策略是所有学生表现差异的最大贡献者,无论性别如何。

结论

学习中的性别差异会影响 STEP1 的表现。考虑本研究的结果将允许为学术成功进行有针对性的干预。