• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习增加创伤后应激障碍患者获得以创伤为重点的干预措施的机会并提高其参与度。

Using machine learning to increase access to and engagement with trauma-focused interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder.

作者信息

Lenton-Brym Ariella P, Collins Alexis, Lane Jeanine, Busso Carlos, Ouyang Jessica, Fitzpatrick Skye, Kuo Janice R, Monson Candice M

机构信息

Nellie Health.

Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Mar;64(1):125-136. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12468. Epub 2024 May 7.

DOI:10.1111/bjc.12468
PMID:38715445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11797152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) poses a global public health challenge. Evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for PTSD reduce symptoms and improve functioning (Forbes et al., Guilford Press, 2020, 3). However, a number of barriers to access and engagement with these interventions prevail. As a result, the use of EBPs in community settings remains disappointingly low (Charney et al., Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 11, 2019, 793; Richards et al., Community Mental Health Journal, 53, 2017, 215), and not all patients who receive an EBP for PTSD benefit optimally (Asmundson et al., Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 48, 2019, 1). Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have introduced new possibilities for increasinfg access to and quality of mental health interventions.

AIMS

The present paper reviews key barriers to accessing and engaging in EBPs for PTSD, discusses current applications of AI in PTSD treatment and provides recommendations for future AI integrations aimed at reducing barriers to access and engagement.

DISCUSSION

We propose that AI may be utilized to (1) assess treatment fidelity; (2) elucidate novel predictors of treatment dropout and outcomes; and (3) facilitate patient engagement with the tasks of therapy, including therapy practice. Potential avenues for technological advancements are also considered.

摘要

背景

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是一项全球性的公共卫生挑战。针对PTSD的循证心理疗法(EBPs)可减轻症状并改善功能(福布斯等人,吉尔福德出版社,2020年,第3页)。然而,获取和参与这些干预措施存在诸多障碍。因此,EBPs在社区环境中的使用仍然低得令人失望(查尼等人,《心理创伤:理论、研究、实践与政策》,第11卷,2019年,第793页;理查兹等人,《社区心理健康杂志》,第53卷,2017年,第215页),而且并非所有接受PTSD循证心理疗法的患者都能获得最佳疗效(阿斯芒森等人,《认知行为疗法》,第48卷,2019年,第1页)。人工智能(AI)的进步为增加心理健康干预措施的可及性和质量带来了新的可能性。

目的

本文回顾了获取和参与PTSD循证心理疗法的主要障碍,讨论了AI在PTSD治疗中的当前应用,并为未来旨在减少获取和参与障碍的AI整合提供建议。

讨论

我们建议AI可用于(1)评估治疗保真度;(2)阐明治疗退出和结果的新预测因素;以及(3)促进患者参与治疗任务,包括治疗实践。还考虑了技术进步的潜在途径。

相似文献

1
Using machine learning to increase access to and engagement with trauma-focused interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder.利用机器学习增加创伤后应激障碍患者获得以创伤为重点的干预措施的机会并提高其参与度。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Mar;64(1):125-136. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12468. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
Clinician Documentation on Receipt of Trauma-Focused Evidence-Based Psychotherapies in a VA PTSD Clinic.退伍军人事务部创伤后应激障碍诊所中关于接受以创伤为重点的循证心理治疗的临床医生记录。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan;43(1):71-87. doi: 10.1007/s11414-013-9372-9.
4
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.
5
Policy Recommendations for Increasing the Use of Evidence-Based Psychotherapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the Military Health System.提高军事卫生系统创伤后应激障碍循证心理治疗使用率的政策建议。
Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):183-186. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac429.
6
Psychological therapies for the treatment of mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises.针对受人道主义危机影响的低收入和中等收入国家精神障碍治疗的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 5;7(7):CD011849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011849.pub2.
7
Childhood trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a real-world Veterans Affairs clinic: Examining treatment preferences and dropout.现实世界中退伍军人事务诊所里的童年创伤与创伤后应激障碍:探究治疗偏好与退出治疗情况
Psychol Trauma. 2016 Jul;8(4):464-467. doi: 10.1037/tra0000132. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
8
Clinical effectiveness study of a treatment to prepare for trauma-focused evidence-based psychotherapies at a veterans affairs specialty posttraumatic stress disorder clinic.退伍军人事务部创伤后应激障碍专科诊所创伤聚焦循证心理治疗准备治疗的临床效果研究。
Psychol Serv. 2021 Nov;18(4):651-662. doi: 10.1037/ser0000425. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
9
Initiation, dropout, and outcome from evidence-based psychotherapies in a VA PTSD outpatient clinic.在退伍军人事务部 PTSD 门诊诊所中,基于证据的心理疗法的开始、脱落和结果。
Psychol Serv. 2018 Nov;15(4):496-502. doi: 10.1037/ser0000175. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
10
A clinician/researcher partnership to understand patterns and predictors of trauma-focused psychotherapy and nontrauma-focused psychotherapy use among veterans with PTSD.临床医生/研究人员合作,以了解 PTSD 退伍军人中创伤聚焦心理治疗和非创伤聚焦心理治疗使用的模式和预测因素。
Psychol Serv. 2023 Aug;20(3):444-452. doi: 10.1037/ser0000583. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Status and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Literature Measurement Analysis.创伤后应激障碍中人工智能的现状与未来方向:文献计量分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;15(1):27. doi: 10.3390/bs15010027.
2
No two traumas are alike, and neither are two presentations of PTSD.没有两次创伤是相同的,创伤后应激障碍的两种表现也不相同。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;24(1):90-91. doi: 10.1002/wps.21277.

本文引用的文献

1
Closing the accessibility gap to mental health treatment with a personalized self-referral chatbot.利用个性化的自助式聊天机器人消除心理健康治疗的可及性差距。
Nat Med. 2024 Feb;30(2):595-602. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02766-x. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
2
Illusory generalizability of clinical prediction models.临床预测模型的虚幻泛化性。
Science. 2024 Jan 12;383(6679):164-167. doi: 10.1126/science.adg8538. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
3
Using machine learning algorithms to predict the effects of change processes in psychotherapy: Toward process-level treatment personalization.使用机器学习算法预测心理治疗中改变过程的效果:迈向过程层面的治疗个性化。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2023 Dec;60(4):536-547. doi: 10.1037/pst0000507. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
4
To chat or bot to chat: Ethical issues with using chatbots in mental health.聊天还是由聊天机器人来聊天:心理健康领域使用聊天机器人的伦理问题。
Digit Health. 2023 Jun 22;9:20552076231183542. doi: 10.1177/20552076231183542. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
An integrative review on the acceptance of artificial intelligence among healthcare professionals in hospitals.关于医院医护人员对人工智能接受度的综合综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jun 10;6(1):111. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00852-5.
6
Artificial Intelligence and Cancer Control: Toward Prioritizing Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) in Emerging Decision Support Technologies.人工智能与癌症防控:新兴决策支持技术中优先考虑公正、公平、多样性和包容性(JEDI)
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 May;25(5):387-424. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01376-7. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
7
A Call to Action on Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Artificial Intelligence Applications for Mental Health.呼吁重视并减轻人工智能应用于精神健康领域中的偏见
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;18(5):1062-1096. doi: 10.1177/17456916221134490. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
8
Predicting early dropout in online versus face-to-face guided self-help: A machine learning approach.预测在线与面对面引导自助治疗中的早期脱落:一种机器学习方法。
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Dec;159:104200. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104200. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
9
Enhancing the quality of cognitive behavioral therapy in community mental health through artificial intelligence generated fidelity feedback (Project AFFECT): a study protocol.通过人工智能生成的保真度反馈增强社区心理健康中的认知行为疗法质量(AFFECT 项目):研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):1177. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08519-9.
10
Picture a data scientist: a call to action for increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in the age of AI.想象一下数据科学家的形象:在人工智能时代,呼吁增加多样性、公平性和包容性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Nov 14;29(12):2178-2181. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac156.