Claerhout Sofie, Noppe Hanna, Cohn Betty, Borry Pascal
Laboratory for Forensic Genetics, Forensic Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Interdisciplinary Research Facility, KU Leuven Kulak, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 24;10(9):e30074. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30074. eCollection 2024 May 15.
Forensic DNA kinship investigation involves analyzing genetic relationships between individuals to offer new leads for solving (cold) cases. Familial DNA matching has become a valuable asset in criminal case investigations, especially when traditional DNA methods hit dead ends. However, concerns surrounding ethical and privacy implications raised questions about its implementation and acceptance among the general public. The present study investigated the public perspectives regarding forensic DNA kinship investigations among 1710 Dutch-speaking Belgians using an online cross-sectional survey. The questionnaire consisted of three categories, including personal information, DNA knowledge, and their opinion on several familial DNA searching and investigative genetic genealogy related questions. The participants' average DNA knowledge score was 71 %, indicating a relatively high level of understanding of DNA-related concepts. Remarkably, the study revealed that 92 % of the participants expressed willingness to cooperate as a volunteer in a forensic DNA kinship investigation, irrespective of their scientific background or educational level. Key factors influencing participation included assurance of painless sampling and robust privacy safeguards. Participants lacking familiarity with DNA hesitated more towards participating in forensic DNA analysis, referring to "the fear of the unknown". Despite ethical and privacy concerns, the highly positive attitude towards forensic DNA analysis reflects a level of empathy and willingness to contribute to the pursuit of justice. Nearly all participants (95 %) agreed to use online DNA databases for resolving violent crimes with forensic genetic genealogy, but half emphasized the need for prior informed consent, referring to the current "opt-in" system. The results underscore the need for stringent regulations and ethical oversight to ensure the responsible use of genetic data while striking a balance between public safety and the protection of individuals' privacy rights. These findings add to the growing body of evidence regarding the potential benefits of forensic DNA kinship matching as a tool in criminal investigations, suggesting its potential future utilization and legalization.
法医DNA亲属关系调查涉及分析个体之间的遗传关系,为解决(悬而未决的)案件提供新线索。家族DNA匹配已成为刑事案件调查中的一项宝贵资产,尤其是在传统DNA方法陷入僵局时。然而,围绕伦理和隐私问题的担忧引发了人们对其实施以及在公众中接受度的质疑。本研究通过在线横断面调查,调查了1710名说法语的比利时人对法医DNA亲属关系调查的公众看法。问卷包括三个类别,即个人信息、DNA知识,以及他们对几个与家族DNA搜索和调查性遗传系谱相关问题的看法。参与者的平均DNA知识得分是71%,表明对DNA相关概念的理解程度相对较高。值得注意的是,研究表明,92%的参与者表示愿意作为志愿者参与法医DNA亲属关系调查,无论其科学背景或教育水平如何。影响参与的关键因素包括无痛采样的保证和强有力的隐私保护措施。对DNA不熟悉的参与者在参与法医DNA分析时更加犹豫,提到了“对未知的恐惧”。尽管存在伦理和隐私问题,但对法医DNA分析的高度积极态度反映了一定程度的同理心以及为追求正义做出贡献的意愿。几乎所有参与者(95%)都同意使用在线DNA数据库通过法医遗传系谱来解决暴力犯罪问题,但一半的人强调需要事先获得知情同意,提到了当前的“选择加入”系统。结果强调了需要严格的法规和伦理监督,以确保在平衡公共安全和保护个人隐私权的同时,负责任地使用遗传数据。这些发现增加了越来越多的证据,证明法医DNA亲属关系匹配作为刑事调查工具的潜在好处,表明其未来潜在的利用和合法化。