• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全关节置换术后再入院风险的术前预测模型:一种利用 NLP 和不公平性缓解的随机森林方法,以改善患者护理和成本效益。

Preoperative prediction model for risk of readmission after total joint replacement surgery: a random forest approach leveraging NLP and unfairness mitigation for improved patient care and cost-effectiveness.

机构信息

Novant Health Cognitive Computing, Novant Health, Inc, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center, Novant Health, Inc, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 May 10;19(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04774-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-04774-0
PMID:38725085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11084055/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) imposes payment penalties for readmissions following total joint replacement surgeries. This study focuses on total hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty procedures as they account for most joint replacement surgeries. Apart from being a burden to healthcare systems, readmissions are also troublesome for patients. There are several studies which only utilized structured data from Electronic Health Records (EHR) without considering any gender and payor bias adjustments.

METHODS

For this study, dataset of 38,581 total knee, hip, and shoulder replacement surgeries performed from 2015 to 2021 at Novant Health was gathered. This data was used to train a random forest machine learning model to predict the combined endpoint of emergency department (ED) visit or unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge or discharge to Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) following the surgery. 98 features of laboratory results, diagnoses, vitals, medications, and utilization history were extracted. A natural language processing (NLP) model finetuned from Clinical BERT was used to generate an NLP risk score feature for each patient based on their clinical notes. To address societal biases, a feature bias analysis was performed in conjunction with propensity score matching. A threshold optimization algorithm from the Fairlearn toolkit was used to mitigate gender and payor biases to promote fairness in predictions.

RESULTS

The model achieved an Area Under the Receiver Operating characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.738 (95% confidence interval, 0.724 to 0.754) and an Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.406 (95% confidence interval, 0.384 to 0.433). Considering an outcome prevalence of 16%, these metrics indicate the model's ability to accurately discriminate between readmission and non-readmission cases within the context of total arthroplasty surgeries while adjusting patient scores in the model to mitigate bias based on patient gender and payor.

CONCLUSION

This work culminated in a model that identifies the most predictive and protective features associated with the combined endpoint. This model serves as a tool to empower healthcare providers to proactively intervene based on these influential factors without introducing bias towards protected patient classes, effectively mitigating the risk of negative outcomes and ultimately improving quality of care regardless of socioeconomic factors.

摘要

背景

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)对全关节置换手术后的再入院实施罚款。本研究主要关注全髋关节、膝关节和肩关节置换手术,因为它们占大多数关节置换手术。除了给医疗系统带来负担外,再入院也给患者带来了麻烦。有几项研究仅利用电子健康记录(EHR)中的结构化数据,而没有考虑任何性别和支付方偏见调整。

方法

在这项研究中,收集了 2015 年至 2021 年期间在诺万健康进行的 38581 例全膝关节、髋关节和肩关节置换手术的数据。该数据用于训练随机森林机器学习模型,以预测手术后 30 天内出院或出院到熟练护理设施(SNF)时急诊就诊或计划外再入院的联合终点。提取了实验室结果、诊断、生命体征、药物和利用历史的 98 个特征。使用从 Clinical BERT 微调的自然语言处理(NLP)模型,根据患者的临床记录为每位患者生成一个 NLP 风险评分特征。为了解决社会偏见问题,与倾向评分匹配相结合进行了特征偏差分析。使用 Fairlearn 工具包中的阈值优化算法来减轻性别和支付方的偏见,以促进预测的公平性。

结果

该模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为 0.738(95%置信区间,0.724 至 0.754),精度-召回曲线下面积(AUPRC)为 0.406(95%置信区间,0.384 至 0.433)。考虑到结果的患病率为 16%,这些指标表明,该模型能够在全关节置换手术背景下准确区分再入院和非再入院病例,同时调整模型中患者的分数,以减轻基于患者性别和支付方的偏见。

结论

这项工作最终形成了一个模型,可以识别与联合终点相关的最具预测性和保护性的特征。该模型是一种工具,可以使医疗保健提供者能够根据这些影响因素主动干预,而不会对受保护的患者群体产生偏见,有效降低负面结果的风险,最终无论社会经济因素如何,都能提高护理质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/782e900acaff/13018_2024_4774_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/7dc2266ba185/13018_2024_4774_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/46414b9d10e1/13018_2024_4774_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/90d6c887b1bb/13018_2024_4774_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/5b46a57df9ad/13018_2024_4774_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/01f3c0ecd391/13018_2024_4774_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/92afcbfd5d1e/13018_2024_4774_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/594d8db52967/13018_2024_4774_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/45736385e0cc/13018_2024_4774_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/8c0eeb627f7e/13018_2024_4774_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/42914425f2aa/13018_2024_4774_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/a03e5ecf8b36/13018_2024_4774_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/6dee3fd42e3a/13018_2024_4774_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/8f1d45d4d979/13018_2024_4774_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/32182d97d6fb/13018_2024_4774_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/8a729664b6e4/13018_2024_4774_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/782e900acaff/13018_2024_4774_Fig16_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/7dc2266ba185/13018_2024_4774_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/46414b9d10e1/13018_2024_4774_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/90d6c887b1bb/13018_2024_4774_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/5b46a57df9ad/13018_2024_4774_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/01f3c0ecd391/13018_2024_4774_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/92afcbfd5d1e/13018_2024_4774_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/594d8db52967/13018_2024_4774_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/45736385e0cc/13018_2024_4774_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/8c0eeb627f7e/13018_2024_4774_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/42914425f2aa/13018_2024_4774_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/a03e5ecf8b36/13018_2024_4774_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/6dee3fd42e3a/13018_2024_4774_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/8f1d45d4d979/13018_2024_4774_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/32182d97d6fb/13018_2024_4774_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/8a729664b6e4/13018_2024_4774_Fig15_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80c2/11084055/782e900acaff/13018_2024_4774_Fig16_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Preoperative prediction model for risk of readmission after total joint replacement surgery: a random forest approach leveraging NLP and unfairness mitigation for improved patient care and cost-effectiveness.全关节置换术后再入院风险的术前预测模型:一种利用 NLP 和不公平性缓解的随机森林方法,以改善患者护理和成本效益。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 May 10;19(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04774-0.
2
Machine Learning on Medicare Claims Poorly Predicts the Individual Risk of 30-Day Unplanned Readmission After Total Joint Arthroplasty, Yet Uncovers Interesting Population-level Associations With Annual Procedure Volumes.机器学习在医疗保险索赔中预测全膝关节置换术后 30 天内非计划性再入院的个体风险效果不佳,但却揭示了与年度手术量有关的有趣的人群水平关联。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Sep 1;481(9):1745-1759. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002705. Epub 2023 May 31.
3
Which Clinical and Patient Factors Influence the National Economic Burden of Hospital Readmissions After Total Joint Arthroplasty?哪些临床和患者因素会影响全关节置换术后再入院的国家经济负担?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2926-2937. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5244-6.
4
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Costs for Hospital Returns After Total Joint Arthroplasties.全关节置换术后再入院的发生率、危险因素及费用
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):381-385. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
5
Will Medicare Readmission Penalties Motivate Hospitals to Reduce Arthroplasty Readmissions?医疗保险再入院处罚措施会促使医院减少关节置换术的再入院率吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):709-713. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.031. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
6
Preoperative Optimization Checklists Within the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Bundle Have Not Decreased Hospital Returns for Total Knee Arthroplasty.术前优化检查表纳入关节置换综合护理包并未降低全膝关节置换术后的医院返诊率。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S108-S113. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
7
How Much Does a Readmission Cost the Bundle Following Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?初次髋关节和膝关节置换术后,再次入院治疗捆绑包的费用是多少?
J Arthroplasty. 2019 May;34(5):819-823. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.029. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
8
Clinical Outcomes and Costs Within 90 Days of Primary or Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.初次或翻修全关节置换术后90天内的临床结果与成本
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jul;31(7):1400-1406.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
9
The Association Between Hospital Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Risk Within a Total Joint Arthroplasty Bundled Payment Initiative.全关节置换捆绑支付计划中医院住院时间与90天再入院风险之间的关联。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):714-718. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
10
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator Has a Role in Predicting Discharge to Post-Acute Care in Total Joint Arthroplasty.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划手术风险计算器在预测全关节置换术后进入康复护理中的作用。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.骨科手术中的人工智能:当前应用、挑战及未来方向。
MedComm (2020). 2025 Jun 25;6(7):e70260. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70260. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Exploring Natural Language Processing through an Exemplar Using YouTube.通过 YouTube 探索自然语言处理的范例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;21(10):1357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101357.
3
Knowledge and attitudes toward artificial intelligence in nursing among various categories of professionals in China: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty.肩关节置换术的发病率:与髋关节和膝关节置换术相比的增长和未来预测。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Dec;29(12):2601-2609. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.049. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
2
Comparison of machine learning techniques to predict unplanned readmission following total shoulder arthroplasty.比较机器学习技术预测全肩关节置换术后非计划性再入院。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Feb;30(2):e50-e59. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.013. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining.
中国不同类别专业人员对护理领域人工智能的认知与态度:一项横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 2;12:1433252. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1433252. eCollection 2024.
BioBERT:一种用于生物医学文本挖掘的预训练生物医学语言表示模型。
Bioinformatics. 2020 Feb 15;36(4):1234-1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682.
4
Rates of Total Joint Replacement in the United States: Future Projections to 2020-2040 Using the National Inpatient Sample.美国全关节置换术的比率:利用国家住院患者样本对 2020-2040 年的未来预测。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;46(9):1134-1140. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170990. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
5
Factors Affecting Readmission Rates Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术后再入院率的影响因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jul 16;96(14):1201-1209. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00556.
6
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
7
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.纵向研究中预后合并症分类的一种新方法:开发与验证
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.