Ramachandran Karthik, Chandramohan Madhanmohan, Shetty Ajoy Prasad, Subramanian Balavenkat, Kanna Rishi Mugesh, Rajasekaran Shanmuganathan
Department of Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Department of Anesthesiology, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr;15(3):1625-1634. doi: 10.1177/21925682241254327. Epub 2024 May 10.
Study designProspective, randomized controlled study.ObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of an ultrasound-guided ISP block for postoperative analgesia in posterior cervical laminectomy.Methods88 patients requiring posterior cervical laminectomy were randomized into two groups, those who underwent ISP block with multimodal analgesia (ISPB group) and those with only multimodal analgesia (control group). Demographic details, intraoperative parameters (blood loss, duration of surgery, perioperative total opioid consumption, muscle relaxants used), and postoperative parameters (numeric rating scale, satisfaction score, mobilization time, and complications) were recorded.ResultsThe total opioid consumption (128.41 + 39.65vs 284.09 + 140.92mcg; < .001), muscle relaxant usage (46.14 + 6.18 mg vs 59.32 + 3.97 mg; < .001), surgical duration (128.61 + 26.08/160.23 + 30.99mins; < .01), and intra-operative blood loss (233.18 + 66.08 mL vs 409.77 + 115.41 mL; < .01) were significantly less in the ISPB group compared to the control. In the postoperative period, the control group's pain score was significantly higher ( < .001) in the initial 48 hours. The Modified Observer Alertness/Sedation Score (MOASS) score and satisfaction scores were significantly better in the ISPB compared to the control ( < .001). The mean time required to ambulate was statistically less in ISPB (4.30 + 1.64hours) when compared to controls (9.48 + 3.07hours) ( < .001).ConclusionIn patients undergoing posterior cervical laminectomy, ISP block is a safe and effective technique with better outcomes than standard multi-modal analgesia alone, in terms of reduced intra-operative opioid requirements and blood loss, better postoperative analgesia, and early mobilization.
研究设计
前瞻性随机对照研究。
目的
评估超声引导下颈后路椎板切除术后椎旁肌间隙阻滞(ISP)用于术后镇痛的安全性和有效性。
方法
88例行颈后路椎板切除术的患者被随机分为两组,一组接受ISP阻滞联合多模式镇痛(ISPB组),另一组仅接受多模式镇痛(对照组)。记录人口统计学细节、术中参数(失血量、手术时间、围手术期总阿片类药物消耗量、使用的肌肉松弛剂)和术后参数(数字评分量表、满意度评分、活动时间和并发症)。
结果
与对照组相比,ISPB组的总阿片类药物消耗量(128.41 + 39.65对284.09 + 140.92mcg;P < .001)、肌肉松弛剂用量(46.14 + 6.18mg对59.32 + 3.97mg;P < .001)、手术时间(128.61 + 26.08/160.23 + 30.99分钟;P < .01)和术中失血量(233.18 + 66.08mL对409.77 + 115.41mL;P < .01)显著减少。术后,对照组在最初48小时的疼痛评分显著更高(P < .001)。与对照组相比,ISPB组的改良观察警觉/镇静评分(MOASS)和满意度评分显著更好(P < .001)。与对照组(9.48 + 3.07小时)相比,ISPB组的平均行走时间在统计学上更短(4.30 + 1.64小时)(P < .001)。
结论
对于接受颈后路椎板切除术的患者,ISP阻滞是一种安全有效的技术,在减少术中阿片类药物需求和失血量、改善术后镇痛以及早期活动方面,比单纯标准多模式镇痛具有更好的效果。