Suppr超能文献

在一个低收入城市社区对步行校车项目进行的试点评估。

Pilot evaluation of a walking school bus program in a low-income, urban community.

作者信息

Mendoza Jason A, Levinger David D, Johnston Brian D

机构信息

USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center and Academic General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, 1100 Bates St, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA .

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2009 May 4;9:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-122.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of a walking school bus (WSB) program on student transport in a low-income, urban neighborhood.

METHODS

The design was a controlled, quasi-experimental trial with consecutive cross-sectional assessments. The setting was three urban, socioeconomically disadvantaged, public elementary schools (1 intervention vs. 2 controls) in Seattle, Washington, USA. Participants were ethnically diverse students in kindergarten-5th grade (aged 5-11 years). The intervention was a WSB program consisting of a part-time WSB coordinator and parent volunteers. Students' method of transportation to school was assessed by a classroom survey at baseline and one-year follow-up. The Pearson Chi-squared test compared students transported to school at the intervention versus control schools at each time point. Due to multiple testing, we calculated adjusted p-values using the Ryan-Holm stepdown Bonferroni procedure. McNemar's test was used to examine the change from baseline to 12-month follow-up for walking versus all other forms of school transport at the intervention or control schools.

RESULTS

At baseline, the proportions of students (n = 653) walking to the intervention (20% +/- 2%) or control schools (15% +/- 2%) did not differ (p = 0.39). At 12-month follow up, higher proportions of students (n = 643, p = 0.001)) walked to the intervention (25% +/- 2%) versus the control schools (7% +/- 1%). No significant changes were noted in the proportion of students riding in a car or taking the school bus at baseline or 12-month follow up (all p > 0.05). Comparing baseline to 12-month follow up, the numbers of students who walked to the intervention school increased while the numbers of students who used the other forms of transport did not change (p < 0.0001). In contrast, the numbers of students who walked to the control schools decreased while the numbers of students who used the other forms of transport did not change (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A WSB program is a promising intervention among urban, low-income elementary school students that may promote favorable changes toward active transport to school.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00402701.

摘要

背景

评估步行校车(WSB)项目对美国华盛顿州西雅图市一个低收入城市社区学生出行方式的影响。

方法

采用对照、准实验性试验,并进行连续的横断面评估。研究地点为美国华盛顿州西雅图市三所城市社会经济条件不利的公立小学(1所干预学校和2所对照学校)。参与者为幼儿园至五年级(5 - 11岁)的不同种族学生。干预措施为一个步行校车项目,由一名兼职步行校车协调员和家长志愿者组成。通过在基线和一年随访时进行的课堂调查评估学生上学的交通方式。使用Pearson卡方检验比较干预学校和对照学校在每个时间点乘坐交通工具上学的学生情况。由于进行了多次检验,我们使用Ryan-Holm逐步递减的Bonferroni程序计算校正p值。使用McNemar检验来研究干预学校或对照学校从基线到12个月随访期间步行与所有其他形式的学校交通方式的变化。

结果

在基线时,步行前往干预学校(20%±2%)或对照学校(15%±2%)的学生比例无差异(p = 0.39)。在12个月随访时,步行前往干预学校的学生比例(n = 643,p = 0.001)高于对照学校(7%±1%)。在基线或12个月随访时,乘坐汽车或乘坐校车的学生比例没有显著变化(所有p>0.05)。比较基线和12个月随访情况,步行前往干预学校的学生数量增加,而使用其他交通方式的学生数量没有变化(p<0.0001)。相比之下,步行前往对照学校的学生数量减少,而使用其他交通方式的学生数量没有变化(p<0.0001)。

结论

步行校车项目对于城市低收入小学生来说是一种有前景的干预措施,可能会促进学生向积极的上学交通方式转变。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00402701。

相似文献

1
Pilot evaluation of a walking school bus program in a low-income, urban community.
BMC Public Health. 2009 May 4;9:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-122.
2
Evaluation of a walking school bus program: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 May 10;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01602-w.
3
Impact of Walking School Bus Programs on Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectations.
J Phys Act Health. 2021 May 26;18(7):858-862. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2020-0453. Print 2021 Jul 1.
4
Parent Perceptions on a Walking School Bus Program Among Low-Income Families: A Qualitative Study.
J Phys Act Health. 2019 Nov 1;16(11):1047-1053. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0637. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
5
Implementation of a walking school bus: lessons learned.
J Sch Health. 2009 Jul;79(7):319-25; quiz 333-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00416.x.
7
Walking school bus programs in U.S. public elementary schools.
J Phys Act Health. 2013 Jul;10(5):641-5. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.5.641. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
8
Examining the impact of the walking school bus with an agent-based model.
Am J Public Health. 2014 Jul;104(7):1196-203. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301896. Epub 2014 May 15.
10
Characteristics of travel to and from school among adolescents in NSW, Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2007 Nov;43(11):755-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01159.x. Epub 2007 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a walking school bus program: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 May 10;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01602-w.
6
Physical activity and social connectedness interventions in outdoor spaces among children and youth: a rapid review.
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020 Apr;40(4):104-115. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.4.02.
7
Parental barriers to active transport to school: a systematic review.
Int J Public Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):87-98. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01313-1. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Impact of an Australian state-wide active travel campaign targeting primary schools.
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Apr 5;14:100866. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100866. eCollection 2019 Jun.
9
Specific Strategies for Promotion of Physical Activity in Kids-Which Ones Work? A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015 Nov 15;12(1):51-82. doi: 10.1177/1559827615616381. eCollection 2018 Jan-Feb.
10
Bicycle Trains, Cycling, and Physical Activity: A Pilot Cluster RCT.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Oct;53(4):481-489. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of active commuting to school and childrens physical activity and weight.
J Phys Act Health. 2008 Nov;5(6):930-49. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.6.930.
2
Children's active commuting to school: current knowledge and future directions.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2008 Jul;5(3):A100. Epub 2008 Jun 15.
3
Validity and reliability of a school travel survey.
J Phys Act Health. 2008;5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-15. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.s1.s1.
4
Characteristics associated with US Walk to School programs.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Dec 19;4:67. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-67.
5
Promoting walking to school: results of a quasi-experimental trial.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Sep;61(9):818-23. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.048181.
6
Active transportation to school: trends among U.S. schoolchildren, 1969-2001.
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Jun;32(6):509-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.022.
7
Travel by walking before and after school and physical activity among adolescent girls.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Feb;161(2):153-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.2.153.
8
Active travel to school and cardiovascular fitness in Danish children and adolescents.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Oct;38(10):1724-31. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000229570.02037.1d.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验