Zimmermann Corinna, Michelmann Adrian, Daniel Yannick, Enderle Markus D, Salkic Nermin, Linzenbold Walter
Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, 72072 Tübingen, Germany.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Tuzla, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 27;16(9):1700. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091700.
The accurate delineation of ablation zones (AZs) is crucial for assessing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy's efficacy. Manual measurement, the current standard, is subject to variability and potential inaccuracies.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in automating AZ measurements in ultrasound images and compare its accuracy with manual measurements in ultrasound images.
An in vitro study was conducted using chicken breast and liver samples subjected to bipolar RFA. Ultrasound images were captured every 15 s, with the AI model Mask2Former trained for AZ segmentation. The measurements were compared across all methods, focusing on short-axis (SA) metrics.
We performed 308 RFA procedures, generating 7275 ultrasound images across liver and chicken breast tissues. Manual and AI measurement comparisons for ablation zone diameters revealed no significant differences, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.96 in both tissues ( < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots and a Deming regression analysis demonstrated a very close alignment between AI predictions and manual measurements, with the average difference between the two methods being -0.259 and -0.243 mm, for bovine liver and chicken breast tissue, respectively.
The study validates the Mask2Former model as a promising tool for automating AZ measurement in RFA research, offering a significant step towards reducing manual measurement variability.
准确描绘消融区(AZs)对于评估射频消融(RFA)治疗的疗效至关重要。目前的标准手动测量存在变异性和潜在的不准确性。
本研究旨在评估人工智能(AI)在超声图像中自动测量AZ的有效性,并将其准确性与超声图像中的手动测量进行比较。
使用接受双极RFA的鸡胸和肝脏样本进行体外研究。每15秒采集一次超声图像,使用Mask2Former人工智能模型进行AZ分割训练。对所有方法的测量结果进行比较,重点关注短轴(SA)指标。
我们进行了308次RFA手术,在肝脏和鸡胸组织中生成了7275张超声图像。消融区直径的手动测量和人工智能测量比较显示无显著差异,两种组织中的相关系数均超过0.96(<0.001)。Bland-Altman图和Deming回归分析表明,人工智能预测与手动测量非常接近,对于牛肝和鸡胸组织,两种方法的平均差异分别为-0.259和-