• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室尺寸较小是经皮引流后复发性心包积液的一个危险因素。

Small Left Ventricular Size Is a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pericardial Effusion after Percutaneous Drainage.

作者信息

Akao Kousuke, Imamura Teruhiko, Kinugawa Koichiro

机构信息

Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani Toyama, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 30;13(9):2644. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092644.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13092644
PMID:38731173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11084400/
Abstract

Significant pericardial effusion requires percutaneous drainage. Some patients experience recurrent pericardial effusion following index drainage, but its risk factors remain unknown. Such knowledge should further improve the clinical management of individuals presenting with pericardial effusion for risk stratification and the construction of therapeutic and management strategies beforehand. Patients who underwent percutaneous drainage for pericardial effusion between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively included and were followed for 2 years or until November 2023. Baseline factors associated with recurrent pericardial effusion that required percutaneous drainage again were investigated to identify the high-risk cohort. A total of 39 patients (83 years on median, 28 males) were included. During the 2-year observation period, 11 patients had the primary outcome. The left ventricular end-diastolic diameter at baseline was independently associated with the primary outcome with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.80-0.97, = 0.013) with a cutoff of 42 mm, which significantly stratified the cumulative incidence of the primary outcome (53% versus 10%, = 0.011). Recurrent pericardial effusion after percutaneous drainage is not a rare phenomenon. A smaller left ventricular endo-diastolic diameter was an independent risk factor for recurrent pericardial effusion. The clinical implications of our findings in daily clinical practice should be validated in future prospective studies. Further studies are warranted to clarify the underlying causality between them.

摘要

大量心包积液需要进行经皮引流。一些患者在首次引流后会出现复发性心包积液,但其危险因素尚不清楚。掌握这些知识应能进一步改善心包积液患者的临床管理,以便进行风险分层并预先制定治疗和管理策略。回顾性纳入了2018年至2023年间因心包积液接受经皮引流的患者,并随访2年或至2023年11月。研究与再次需要经皮引流的复发性心包积液相关的基线因素,以确定高危人群。共纳入39例患者(中位年龄83岁,男性28例)。在2年观察期内,11例患者出现主要结局。基线时的左心室舒张末期内径与主要结局独立相关,调整后的风险比为0.88(95%置信区间0.80-0.97,P = 0.013),截断值为42 mm,这显著分层了主要结局的累积发生率(53%对10%,P = 0.011)。经皮引流后复发性心包积液并非罕见现象。较小的左心室舒张末期内径是复发性心包积液的独立危险因素。我们研究结果在日常临床实践中的临床意义应在未来的前瞻性研究中得到验证。有必要进一步研究以阐明它们之间的潜在因果关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db60/11084400/f9a37b4684e9/jcm-13-02644-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db60/11084400/d37a14b28565/jcm-13-02644-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db60/11084400/f9a37b4684e9/jcm-13-02644-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db60/11084400/d37a14b28565/jcm-13-02644-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db60/11084400/f9a37b4684e9/jcm-13-02644-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Small Left Ventricular Size Is a Risk Factor for Recurrent Pericardial Effusion after Percutaneous Drainage.左心室尺寸较小是经皮引流后复发性心包积液的一个危险因素。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 30;13(9):2644. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092644.
2
Clinical outcomes of image-guided percutaneous drainage of pericardial effusion in cancer patients: A single-center retrospective analysis.癌症患者影像引导下经皮心包积液引流的临床结局:一项单中心回顾性分析。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb;19(1):257-262. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13810. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
3
Management of Pericardial Effusion in Patients With Solid Tumor: An Algorithmic, Multidisciplinary Approach Results in Reduced Mortality After Paradoxical Hemodynamic Instability.实体瘤患者心包积液的处理:一种算法性、多学科方法可降低矛盾性血流动力学不稳定后的死亡率。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):147-153. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006114. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
4
Cardiac tamponade in the pediatric oncology population: treatment by percutaneous catheter drainage.儿科肿瘤患者的心脏压塞:经皮导管引流治疗
J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Jan;31(1):197-9; discussion 199-200. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(96)90347-4.
5
Pericardial Involvement in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Prevalence, Associates, and Clinical Implications.COVID-19 住院患者的心包累及:患病率、相关因素和临床意义。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):e024363. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024363. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
6
Pericardial sclerosis as the primary management of malignant pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade.心包硬化作为恶性心包积液和心脏压塞的主要治疗方法。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Sep;112(3):637-43. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70046-6.
7
Comparison of surgical pericardial drainage with percutaneous catheter drainage for pericardial effusion.心包积液的外科心包引流与经皮导管引流的比较。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Nov;24(11):590-3.
8
[Percutaneous balloon pericardiotomy in patients with recurrent pericardial effusion].[复发性心包积液患者的经皮气球心包切开术]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2002 Jan;55(1):25-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-8932(02)76549-4.
9
Outcomes of primary and secondary treatment of pericardial effusion in patients with malignancy.恶性肿瘤患者心包积液的初次及二次治疗结果
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Mar;75(3):248-53. doi: 10.4065/75.3.248.
10
Percutaneous drainage of postoperative pericardial effusion in cardiac surgery.心脏手术后心包积液的经皮引流。
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Feb;25(1):95-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2011.00680.x. Epub 2011 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
In-hospital adverse events and recurrence in hospitalized patients with acute pericarditis.住院患者急性心包炎的院内不良事件和复发。
J Cardiol. 2023 Oct;82(4):268-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Chronic Pericardial Effusion: Causes and Management.慢性心包积液:病因与处理。
Can J Cardiol. 2023 Aug;39(8):1121-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
3
Contemporary management of pericardial effusion.心包积液的现代处理方法。
Panminerva Med. 2021 Sep;63(3):288-300. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.20.04197-X. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
4
Effect of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Malignant Pericardial Effusion.抗炎药物对恶性心包积液患者临床结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 29;76(13):1551-1561. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.003.
5
The Role of the Pericardium in Heart Failure: Implications for Pathophysiology and Treatment.心包在心衰中的作用:对病理生理学和治疗的影响。
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jul;7(7):574-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.03.021.
6
Treatment of Pericardial Effusion Through Subxiphoid Tube Pericardiostomy and Computerized Tomography- or Echocardiography - Guided Percutaneous Catheter Drainage Methods.经剑突下心包造口术及计算机断层扫描或超声心动图引导下经皮导管引流法治疗心包积液
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Mar-Apr;34(2):194-202. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0077.
7
Contemporary management of pericardial effusion: practical aspects for clinical practice.心包积液的当代管理:临床实践的实用方面
Postgrad Med. 2017 Mar;129(2):178-186. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1285676. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Pericardial Effusions: Causes, Diagnosis, and Management.心包积液:病因、诊断与处理
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jan-Feb;59(4):380-388. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
9
2015 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases.2015年欧洲心脏病学会心包疾病诊断和管理指南。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015 Dec;68(12):1126. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2015.10.008.
10
New clinical trials in acute and recurrent pericarditis.急性和复发性心包炎的新临床试验。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015;17(4):23. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0575-y.