• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型美国医疗机构开展工作场所基因检测后的医疗保健利用和行为变化。

Health care utilization and behavior changes after workplace genetic testing at a large US health care system.

机构信息

The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT.

Department of Neurology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2024 Aug;26(8):101160. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101160. Epub 2024 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2024.101160
PMID:38733246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11566502/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study explored employee health behavior changes and health care utilization after workplace genetic testing (wGT). Wellness-program-associated wGT seeks to improve employee health, but the related health implications are unknown.

METHODS

Employees of a large US health care system offering wGT (cancer, heart disease, and pharmacogenomics [PGx]) were sent electronic surveys. Self-reported data from those who received test results were analyzed. Descriptive statistics characterized responses, whereas logistic regression analyses explored correlates of responses to wGT.

RESULTS

53.9% (n = 418/776) of respondents (88.3% female, mean age = 44 years) reported receiving wGT results. 12.0% (n = 48/399) received results indicating increased risk (IR) of cancer, 9.5% (n = 38/398) had IR of heart disease, and 31.4% (n = 125/398) received informative PGx results. IR results for cancer and/or heart disease (n = 67) were associated with health behavior changes (adjusted odds ratio: 3.23; 95% CI 1.75, 6.13; P < .001) and health care utilization (adjusted odds ratio: 8.60; 95% CI 4.43, 17.5; P < .001). Informative PGx results (n = 125) were associated with medication changes (PGx-informative: 15.2%; PGx-uninformative: 4.8%; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

This study explored employee responses to wGT, contributing to the understanding of the ethical and social implications of wGT. Receiving IR results from wGT may promote health behavior changes and health care utilization in employees.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了职场基因检测(wGT)后员工健康行为的变化和医疗保健的利用情况。以促进员工健康为目的的健康计划相关的 wGT,但其相关的健康影响尚不清楚。

方法

美国一家大型医疗保健系统的员工收到了 wGT(癌症、心脏病和药物基因组学[PGx])的电子调查。对收到测试结果的员工进行了自我报告数据的分析。描述性统计分析了这些数据,而逻辑回归分析则探讨了对 wGT 反应的相关因素。

结果

776 名受访者中有 53.9%(n=418)(88.3%为女性,平均年龄为 44 岁)报告收到了 wGT 结果。12.0%(n=48/399)收到了癌症风险增加(IR)的结果,9.5%(n=38/398)有心脏病 IR 的结果,31.4%(n=125/398)收到了信息丰富的 PGx 结果。癌症和/或心脏病的 IR 结果(n=67)与健康行为的改变(调整后的优势比:3.23;95%置信区间 1.75,6.13;P<0.001)和医疗保健的利用(调整后的优势比:8.60;95%置信区间 4.43,17.5;P<0.001)有关。信息丰富的 PGx 结果(n=125)与药物变化有关(PGx-信息丰富:15.2%;PGx-信息缺乏:4.8%;P=0.002)。

结论

本研究探讨了员工对 wGT 的反应,有助于理解 wGT 的伦理和社会影响。从 wGT 中获得 IR 结果可能会促进员工的健康行为的改变和医疗保健的利用。

相似文献

1
Health care utilization and behavior changes after workplace genetic testing at a large US health care system.大型美国医疗机构开展工作场所基因检测后的医疗保健利用和行为变化。
Genet Med. 2024 Aug;26(8):101160. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101160. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
Workplace perk or pitfall? A qualitative study of genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with workplace genetic testing.职场福利还是陷阱?一项关于遗传咨询师对职场基因检测的看法和经历的定性研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70016. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70016.
3
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and workplace genetic testing: Knowledge and perceptions of employed adults in the United States.《遗传信息非歧视法案》与职场基因检测:美国在职成年人的知识与认知
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1945. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1945. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
4
Multidisciplinary stakeholder-informed identification of key characteristics for implementation of workplace genetic testing.多学科利益相关者参与的工作场所基因检测实施关键特征识别
HGG Adv. 2025 May 22;6(3):100458. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100458.
5
Perceived understanding and psychosocial outcomes: employees' responses to learning results of workplace genetic testing.感知到的理解与心理社会结果:员工对职场基因检测学习结果的反应
Per Med. 2025 Jun 11:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2515003.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Workplace Genomic Testing: What Do Company Websites Say about Federal Privacy and Anti-Discrimination Laws?职场基因检测:公司网站对联邦隐私和反歧视法有何说法?
Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):190-195. doi: 10.1159/000546189. Epub 2025 May 3.
8
"I Wish They'd Just Let Us Be." Experiences of Indian Autistic Individuals Around Stimming Behaviors at the Workplace.“我希望他们能让我们顺其自然。”印度自闭症患者在工作场所围绕自我刺激行为的经历。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):474-484. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0096. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings.工作场所干预措施以降低医疗机构外 SARS-CoV-2 感染的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD015112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015112.pub2.
10
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived understanding and psychosocial outcomes: employees' responses to learning results of workplace genetic testing.感知到的理解与心理社会结果:员工对职场基因检测学习结果的反应
Per Med. 2025 Jun 11:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2515003.
2
Multidisciplinary stakeholder-informed identification of key characteristics for implementation of workplace genetic testing.多学科利益相关者参与的工作场所基因检测实施关键特征识别
HGG Adv. 2025 May 22;6(3):100458. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100458.
3
Workplace perk or pitfall? A qualitative study of genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with workplace genetic testing.职场福利还是陷阱?一项关于遗传咨询师对职场基因检测的看法和经历的定性研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70016. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70016.
4
Workplace genetic testing: which employees are likely to participate, what are their concerns with employer sponsorship, and which design features could reduce barriers and increase participation?职场基因检测:哪些员工可能会参与,他们对雇主赞助有哪些担忧,以及哪些设计特点可以减少障碍并提高参与度?
Front Genet. 2024 Dec 4;15:1496900. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1496900. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Genomic testing in voluntary workplace wellness programs in the US: Evidence and challenges.美国自愿性工作场所健康计划中的基因组检测:证据与挑战。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023 Nov;11(11):e2245. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2245. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
2
Racial Differences in Perceptions of Genetic Wellness Programs.种族差异对基因健康计划的看法。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Sep;37(7):940-952. doi: 10.1177/08901171231184360. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
3
Early Insights From a Pharmacogenomic-Enriched Comprehensive Medication Management Program Implementation in an Adult Employee Population.在成年员工群体中实施药物基因组学增强型综合药物管理计划的早期洞察。
J Occup Environ Med. 2022 Dec 1;64(12):e818-e822. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002705. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
4
Voluntary workplace genomic testing: wellness benefit or Pandora's box?职场自愿性基因检测:健康福利还是潘多拉魔盒?
NPJ Genom Med. 2022 Jan 20;7(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00276-8.
5
Population or family history based BRCA gene tests of breast cancer? A systematic review of economic evaluations.基于人群或家族史的乳腺癌BRCA基因检测?经济评估的系统评价
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021 Aug 28;19(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13053-021-00191-0.
6
Physician-directed genetic screening to evaluate personal risk for medically actionable disorders: a large multi-center cohort study.医生指导的基因筛查,以评估具有医学可操作性的疾病的个人风险:一项大型多中心队列研究。
BMC Med. 2021 Aug 18;19(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01999-2.
7
Employees' Views and Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Assessment of Voluntary Workplace Genomic Testing.员工对工作场所自愿进行基因检测的看法以及伦理、法律和社会影响评估
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 17;12:643304. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.643304. eCollection 2021.
8
Estimating the potential impact of implementing pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing in primary care across the UK.估算在英国整个初级保健中实施先发制人药物遗传学检测的潜在影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;87(7):2907-2925. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14704. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
9
Genetic testing and employer-sponsored wellness programs: An overview of current vendors, products, and practices.遗传检测与雇主赞助的健康计划:当前供应商、产品和实践概述。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1414. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1414. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
10
Prevalence of Workplace Health Practices and Policies in Hospitals: Results From the Workplace Health in America Study.医院工作场所健康实践与政策的普及率:美国工作场所健康研究结果
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Nov;34(8):867-875. doi: 10.1177/0890117120905232. Epub 2020 Feb 20.