Charnysh Elizabeth, McCain Sarah, Truhlar Alexandra, Pal Subhamoy, Reader Jonathan M, Sanghavi Kunal, Uhlmann Wendy R, Hendy Katherine, Leader Amy, Blasco Drew, Prince Anya E R, Feero William Gregory, Brandt Rachael, Giri Veda N, Lee Charles, Roberts J Scott
The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Department of Health Behavior & Health Equity, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Per Med. 2025 Jun 11:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2515003.
This study explored employees' understanding of, and psychosocial responses to, workplace genetic testing (wGT) results.
MATERIALS & METHODS: Employees of a US healthcare system who underwent wGT (hereditary cancer/heart disease risk, pharmacogenomics) and received results were surveyed. We ascertained pretest education engagement, test understanding, and psychosocial responses. Regression analyses identified predictors of scores on a modified Feelings About genomiC Test Results questionnaire (positive feelings, negative emotions, and uncertainty after wGT).
= 418 employees (mean age = 44 years; 88.3% female; 80.6% white) completed the survey. Mean scores (out of 12; higher scores indicate a greater extent of each feeling) were 5.2 (SD = 2.9) for positive feelings, 1.2 (SD = 2.2) for negative emotions, and 2.0 (SD = 2.5) for uncertainty. Identifying as non-Hispanic African American/Black and receiving increased risk (cancer/heart disease) wGT results were associated with lower positive feelings and higher negative emotions and uncertainty scores (all < 0.05). Open-ended responses indicated difficulty interpreting, recalling, and utilizing results.
wGT was associated with low levels of measured psychosocial harm among participants. However, results suggested a greater likelihood of negative psychosocial responses among those with increased risk of cancer/heart disease and non-Hispanic African American/Black employees. Future studies should explore strategies to ensure all employees undergoing wGT have educational and psychosocial support.
本研究探讨了员工对工作场所基因检测(wGT)结果的理解以及心理社会反应。
对美国一家医疗系统中接受wGT(遗传性癌症/心脏病风险、药物基因组学)并收到结果的员工进行了调查。我们确定了检测前的教育参与度、对检测的理解以及心理社会反应。回归分析确定了改良后的基因检测结果感受问卷(wGT后的积极感受、负面情绪和不确定性)得分的预测因素。
418名员工(平均年龄 = 44岁;88.3%为女性;80.6%为白人)完成了调查。积极感受的平均得分(满分12分;得分越高表明每种感受的程度越高)为5.2(标准差 = 2.9),负面情绪为1.2(标准差 = 2.2),不确定性为2.0(标准差 = 2.5)。被认定为非西班牙裔非裔美国人/黑人以及收到癌症/心脏病风险增加的wGT结果与较低的积极感受、较高的负面情绪和不确定性得分相关(所有P < 0.05)。开放式回答表明在解释、回忆和利用结果方面存在困难。
wGT与参与者中测得的低水平心理社会伤害相关。然而,结果表明癌症/心脏病风险增加的员工以及非西班牙裔非裔美国人/黑人员工出现负面心理社会反应的可能性更大。未来的研究应探索确保所有接受wGT的员工获得教育和心理社会支持的策略。