• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职场基因检测:哪些员工可能会参与,他们对雇主赞助有哪些担忧,以及哪些设计特点可以减少障碍并提高参与度?

Workplace genetic testing: which employees are likely to participate, what are their concerns with employer sponsorship, and which design features could reduce barriers and increase participation?

作者信息

Briscoe Forrest, Maxwell James H, Bourgoin Angel

机构信息

ILR School, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.

Environment and Health Group (United States), Cambridge, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2024 Dec 4;15:1496900. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1496900. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fgene.2024.1496900
PMID:39698465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11652517/
Abstract

Voluntary genetic testing (GT) leverages low-cost DNA sequencing and other testing methods to provide genetic risk screening for healthy individuals. Given the potential to prevent disease and promote health, some employers now offer GT as an employee benefit (workplace GT, or wGT), but participation remains low. To investigate facilitators and barriers to wGT participation, we conducted one of the first representative surveys of working U.S. adults on this topic (n = 958). We assessed factors that could influence participation, including: sponsoring entity (health provider or employer), program design, and individual demographics. Two-thirds (68%) of respondents indicated willingness to participate in some type of GT, but only half (49%) expressed willingness to participate through their employer. Women were 60% more willing to participate than men, and individuals with previous genetic testing experience were 143% more willing to participate than those without such experience. Across all demographic groups, certain GT program design features tended to increase or decrease willingness to participate. The ability to have one's data deleted from the GT database increased willingness most often (true for 67% of respondents), while selling data to pharmaceutical companies decreased willingness most often (true for 63% of respondents).

摘要

自愿基因检测(GT)利用低成本的DNA测序和其他检测方法为健康个体提供遗传风险筛查。鉴于其在预防疾病和促进健康方面的潜力,一些雇主现在将基因检测作为一项员工福利(工作场所基因检测,即wGT)提供,但参与率仍然很低。为了调查影响工作场所基因检测参与度的促进因素和障碍,我们针对这一主题对美国在职成年人进行了首批具有代表性的调查之一(n = 958)。我们评估了可能影响参与度的因素,包括:赞助实体(医疗服务提供者或雇主)、项目设计和个人人口统计学特征。三分之二(68%)的受访者表示愿意参与某种类型的基因检测,但只有一半(49%)的人表示愿意通过雇主参与。女性参与的意愿比男性高60%,有过基因检测经历的人参与的意愿比没有此类经历的人高143%。在所有人口群体中,某些基因检测项目设计特征往往会增加或降低参与意愿。能够从基因检测数据库中删除个人数据的情况最常增加参与意愿(67%的受访者是这样),而将数据出售给制药公司的情况最常降低参与意愿(63%的受访者是这样)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f4/11652517/60b399b468d2/fgene-15-1496900-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f4/11652517/d6e09558902b/fgene-15-1496900-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f4/11652517/60b399b468d2/fgene-15-1496900-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f4/11652517/d6e09558902b/fgene-15-1496900-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92f4/11652517/60b399b468d2/fgene-15-1496900-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Workplace genetic testing: which employees are likely to participate, what are their concerns with employer sponsorship, and which design features could reduce barriers and increase participation?职场基因检测:哪些员工可能会参与,他们对雇主赞助有哪些担忧,以及哪些设计特点可以减少障碍并提高参与度?
Front Genet. 2024 Dec 4;15:1496900. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1496900. eCollection 2024.
2
Racial Differences in Perceptions of Genetic Wellness Programs.种族差异对基因健康计划的看法。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Sep;37(7):940-952. doi: 10.1177/08901171231184360. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
3
Employees' Views and Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Assessment of Voluntary Workplace Genomic Testing.员工对工作场所自愿进行基因检测的看法以及伦理、法律和社会影响评估
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 17;12:643304. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.643304. eCollection 2021.
4
Genomic testing in voluntary workplace wellness programs in the US: Evidence and challenges.美国自愿性工作场所健康计划中的基因组检测:证据与挑战。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023 Nov;11(11):e2245. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2245. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
Workplace Wellness Programs: Services Offered, Participation, and Incentives.职场健康计划:提供的服务、参与情况及激励措施
Rand Health Q. 2015 Nov 30;5(2):7.
6
Understanding the Relationship Between Incentive Design and Participation in U.S. Workplace Wellness Programs.理解美国职场健康计划中的激励设计与参与度之间的关系。
Am J Health Promot. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(3):198-203. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.150210-QUAN-718.
7
Workplace perk or pitfall? A qualitative study of genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with workplace genetic testing.职场福利还是陷阱?一项关于遗传咨询师对职场基因检测的看法和经历的定性研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70016. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70016.
8
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and workplace genetic testing: Knowledge and perceptions of employed adults in the United States.《遗传信息非歧视法案》与职场基因检测:美国在职成年人的知识与认知
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1945. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1945. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
9
Health care utilization and behavior changes after workplace genetic testing at a large US health care system.大型美国医疗机构开展工作场所基因检测后的医疗保健利用和行为变化。
Genet Med. 2024 Aug;26(8):101160. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101160. Epub 2024 May 8.
10
Workplace Genomic Testing: What Do Company Websites Say about Federal Privacy and Anti-Discrimination Laws?职场基因检测:公司网站对联邦隐私和反歧视法有何说法?
Public Health Genomics. 2025;28(1):190-195. doi: 10.1159/000546189. Epub 2025 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Employee perspectives on genetic testing in the workplace: Results from a national survey.员工对职场基因检测的看法:一项全国性调查的结果。
Public Health Genomics. 2025 Aug 22:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000548116.
2
Perceived understanding and psychosocial outcomes: employees' responses to learning results of workplace genetic testing.感知到的理解与心理社会结果:员工对职场基因检测学习结果的反应
Per Med. 2025 Jun 11:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2515003.
3
Multidisciplinary stakeholder-informed identification of key characteristics for implementation of workplace genetic testing.

本文引用的文献

1
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and workplace genetic testing: Knowledge and perceptions of employed adults in the United States.《遗传信息非歧视法案》与职场基因检测:美国在职成年人的知识与认知
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1945. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1945. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
2
Health care utilization and behavior changes after workplace genetic testing at a large US health care system.大型美国医疗机构开展工作场所基因检测后的医疗保健利用和行为变化。
Genet Med. 2024 Aug;26(8):101160. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101160. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
A systematic literature review of the 'commercialisation effect' on public attitudes towards biobank and genomic data repositories.
多学科利益相关者参与的工作场所基因检测实施关键特征识别
HGG Adv. 2025 May 22;6(3):100458. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100458.
一项关于“商业化效应”对公众对生物银行和基因组数据库的态度影响的系统文献综述。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jul;33(5):548-567. doi: 10.1177/09636625241230864. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
4
Genomic testing in voluntary workplace wellness programs in the US: Evidence and challenges.美国自愿性工作场所健康计划中的基因组检测:证据与挑战。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2023 Nov;11(11):e2245. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2245. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
Racial Differences in Perceptions of Genetic Wellness Programs.种族差异对基因健康计划的看法。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Sep;37(7):940-952. doi: 10.1177/08901171231184360. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
6
Public willingness to participate in population DNA screening in Australia.澳大利亚公众参与人群 DNA 筛查的意愿。
J Med Genet. 2023 Jul;60(7):662-668. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108921. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
7
From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening.从患者到人群:基因组学在人群筛查中的应用。
Front Genet. 2022 Oct 24;13:893832. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.893832. eCollection 2022.
8
ACMG SF v3.1 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)关于临床外显子组和基因组测序中次要发现报告的ACMG SF v3.1清单:一项政策声明
Genet Med. 2022 Jul;24(7):1407-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
9
The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation.群体基因组筛查的兴起:当前项目的特点以及关于最佳实施的证据需求
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 26;12(5):692. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050692.
10
Genetic discrimination: emerging ethical challenges in the context of advancing technology.基因歧视:技术进步背景下新出现的伦理挑战。
J Law Biosci. 2019 Dec 5;7(1):lsz016. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz016. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.