• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族差异对基因健康计划的看法。

Racial Differences in Perceptions of Genetic Wellness Programs.

机构信息

Smeal College of Business, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

University of North Carolina School of Law, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2023 Sep;37(7):940-952. doi: 10.1177/08901171231184360. Epub 2023 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1177/08901171231184360
PMID:37439004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10469479/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Genetic wellness programs (GWPs) are a highly innovative workforce wellness product. Recently marketed to U.S. employers by at least 16 vendors, GWPs take advantage of low-cost DNA sequencing to detect genetic risk factors for an increasing array of diseases. The purpose of this research is to understand perceptions, concerns, and barriers related to GWPs, among employees from Black, White, and Asian backgrounds and different income levels.

APPROACH

Qualitative study with 3 focus groups (FGs).

SETTING

Employees of large high-technology companies (deemed likely early GWP adopters).

RESPONDENTS

21 individuals recruited online through

METHOD

FG guide developed via literature review and landscape analysis, and pre-tested. FGs led by a trained moderator and audio-recorded. Transcripts content analyzed for key themes.

RESULTS

Nearly all respondents saw potential benefits to GWP participation for themselves or their families. However, there were profound differences in perceptions of risks to GWP participation between Black and White/Asian respondents. These differences surfaced in three broad areas: privacy and discrimination risks; family impact risks; and feelings about the employer. Willingness to participate in a GWP also varied between Black employee respondents and White and Asian employee respondents (including low-income White employees). Only 27% of Black employees would participate in GWP, compared to 90% of the other employees.

CONCLUSION

Most employees appear likely to support employer adoption of GWPs. However, Black employees report significant concerns regarding participation. Addressing these concerns through program design would benefit all employees, and could increase trust and uptake of GWPs.

摘要

目的

遗传健康计划(GWPs)是一种极具创新性的员工健康福利产品。最近,至少有 16 家供应商向美国雇主推销 GWPs,GWPs 利用低成本的 DNA 测序来检测越来越多疾病的遗传风险因素。本研究旨在了解不同族裔背景(黑种人、白种人、亚裔)和不同收入水平的员工对 GWPs 的看法、担忧和障碍。

方法

采用 3 个焦点小组(FG)的定性研究。

地点

高科技大公司的员工(被认为是早期 GWP 采用者)。

受访者

通过在线招募了 21 名个人。

方法

通过文献回顾和景观分析制定 FG 指南,并进行预测试。由经过培训的主持人领导 FG 并进行录音。对记录内容进行关键主题的内容分析。

结果

几乎所有受访者都认为 GWP 参与对自己或家人有潜在好处。然而,黑人和白种人/亚洲受访者对 GWP 参与风险的看法存在显著差异。这些差异出现在三个广泛的领域:隐私和歧视风险;家庭影响风险;以及对雇主的感受。黑人员工受访者和白种人/亚洲员工受访者(包括低收入的白种人员工)对参与 GWP 的意愿也有所不同。只有 27%的黑人员工愿意参加 GWP,而其他员工的这一比例为 90%。

结论

大多数员工似乎支持雇主采用 GWPs。然而,黑人员工报告称对参与存在重大担忧。通过项目设计解决这些问题将使所有员工受益,并可以增加对 GWPs 的信任和采用。

相似文献

1
Racial Differences in Perceptions of Genetic Wellness Programs.种族差异对基因健康计划的看法。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Sep;37(7):940-952. doi: 10.1177/08901171231184360. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
2
3
Showers, Culture, and Conflict Resolution: A Qualitative Study of Employees' Perceptions of Workplace Wellness Opportunities.沐浴、文化与冲突解决:员工对工作场所健康机会认知的定性研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Oct;61(10):829-835. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001671.
4
Workplace Wellness Programs: Services Offered, Participation, and Incentives.职场健康计划:提供的服务、参与情况及激励措施
Rand Health Q. 2015 Nov 30;5(2):7.
5
Workforce Characteristics and Attitudes Regarding Participation in Worksite Wellness Programs.关于参与工作场所健康计划的劳动力特征和态度。
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Sep;31(5):391-400. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140613-QUAN-283. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
6
Understanding the Relationship Between Incentive Design and Participation in U.S. Workplace Wellness Programs.理解美国职场健康计划中的激励设计与参与度之间的关系。
Am J Health Promot. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(3):198-203. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.150210-QUAN-718.
7
Perspectives on Workplace Health Promotion Among Employees in Low-Wage Industries.低薪行业员工工作场所健康促进的观点
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Jul-Aug;29(6):384-92. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130924-QUAL-495. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
8
Employee Perceptions of an Established Health and Wellness Coaching Program to Improve Behavior.员工对既定健康和健康促进计划改善行为的看法。
J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Aug 1;65(8):e571-e577. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002905. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
9
Unique Barriers to Workplace Health Promotion Programs by Wage Category: A Qualitative Assessment of Secondary Data.按工资类别划分的工作场所健康促进计划的独特障碍:二次数据的定性评估。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Jun;36(5):843-852. doi: 10.1177/08901171211069546. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
10
Employer and Employee Opinions About Workplace Health Promotion (Wellness) Programs: Results of the 2015 Harris Poll Nielsen Survey.雇主与雇员对职场健康促进(健康)项目的看法:2015年哈里斯民意调查尼尔森调查结果
J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Mar;59(3):256-263. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000946.

引用本文的文献

1
Employee perspectives on genetic testing in the workplace: Results from a national survey.员工对职场基因检测的看法:一项全国性调查的结果。
Public Health Genomics. 2025 Aug 22:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000548116.
2
Perceived understanding and psychosocial outcomes: employees' responses to learning results of workplace genetic testing.感知到的理解与心理社会结果:员工对职场基因检测学习结果的反应
Per Med. 2025 Jun 11:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17410541.2025.2515003.
3
Multidisciplinary stakeholder-informed identification of key characteristics for implementation of workplace genetic testing.多学科利益相关者参与的工作场所基因检测实施关键特征识别
HGG Adv. 2025 May 22;6(3):100458. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100458.
4
Workplace perk or pitfall? A qualitative study of genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with workplace genetic testing.职场福利还是陷阱?一项关于遗传咨询师对职场基因检测的看法和经历的定性研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70016. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70016.
5
Workplace genetic testing: which employees are likely to participate, what are their concerns with employer sponsorship, and which design features could reduce barriers and increase participation?职场基因检测:哪些员工可能会参与,他们对雇主赞助有哪些担忧,以及哪些设计特点可以减少障碍并提高参与度?
Front Genet. 2024 Dec 4;15:1496900. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1496900. eCollection 2024.
6
Health care utilization and behavior changes after workplace genetic testing at a large US health care system.大型美国医疗机构开展工作场所基因检测后的医疗保健利用和行为变化。
Genet Med. 2024 Aug;26(8):101160. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101160. Epub 2024 May 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Unique Barriers to Workplace Health Promotion Programs by Wage Category: A Qualitative Assessment of Secondary Data.按工资类别划分的工作场所健康促进计划的独特障碍:二次数据的定性评估。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Jun;36(5):843-852. doi: 10.1177/08901171211069546. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
Health Benefits In 2021: Employer Programs Evolving In Response To The COVID-19 Pandemic.2021 年的健康福利:雇主计划因应 COVID-19 大流行而演变。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Dec;40(12):1961-1971. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01503. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Genetic discrimination: emerging ethical challenges in the context of advancing technology.基因歧视:技术进步背景下新出现的伦理挑战。
J Law Biosci. 2019 Dec 5;7(1):lsz016. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz016. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
4
Employees' Views and Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Assessment of Voluntary Workplace Genomic Testing.员工对工作场所自愿进行基因检测的看法以及伦理、法律和社会影响评估
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 17;12:643304. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.643304. eCollection 2021.
5
Integrating Workforce Health Into Employer Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Efforts.将劳动力健康融入雇主多样性、公平性和包容性工作中。
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jun;35(5):609-612. doi: 10.1177/0890117120983288. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
6
A Qualitative Study to Develop a Privacy and Nondiscrimination Best Practice Framework for Personalized Wellness Programs.一项旨在为个性化健康计划制定隐私与非歧视最佳实践框架的定性研究。
J Pers Med. 2020 Dec 3;10(4):264. doi: 10.3390/jpm10040264.
7
Genetic testing and employer-sponsored wellness programs: An overview of current vendors, products, and practices.遗传检测与雇主赞助的健康计划:当前供应商、产品和实践概述。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1414. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1414. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
8
Evolving public views on the value of one's DNA and expectations for genomic database governance: Results from a national survey.公众对个人 DNA 价值的看法以及对基因组数据库治理的期望不断变化:一项全国性调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 11;15(3):e0229044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229044. eCollection 2020.
9
Commentary on the Study: "What Do Workplace Wellness Programs Do? Evidence From the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study".评论:“工作场所健康计划有何作用?来自伊利诺伊州工作场所健康计划研究的证据”。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 May;34(4):440-444. doi: 10.1177/0890117120906664. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
10
Medical Mistrust, Racism, and Delays in Preventive Health Screening Among African-American Men.非裔美国男性的医疗不信任、种族主义和预防性健康筛查延迟。
Behav Med. 2019 Apr-Jun;45(2):102-117. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2019.1585327.