Bennion Jacqueline, Manning Christopher, Mansell Stephanie K, Garrett Roger, Martin Daniel
Therapy Services, The Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Therapy Services, University Hospitals Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Mar 6;25(2):210-222. doi: 10.1177/17511437231216610. eCollection 2024 May.
Early mobilisation of critically ill patients remains variable across practice. This study set out to determine barriers to and facilitators of early mobilisation for patients diagnosed with delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU).
A mixed-methods descriptive systematic review. Electronic databases (AMED, BNI, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Medline and EMBASE) were searched for publications up to 22nd December 2021. Independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data using Covidence Systematic Review Management software. Data were summarised according to frequency (n/%) of barriers and facilitators. Thematic analysis of qualitative studies was carried out in order to address the secondary aim. Quantitative studies were assessed using the GRADE quality assessment tool. Qualitative studies were analysed according to the GRADE-CERQual quality assessment tool. This study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42021227655).
Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative findings demonstrated the presence of delirium was the most common reported barrier to early mobilisation. The most common facilitator was ICU staff experience of positive outcomes as a result of early mobilisation interventions. Thematic analysis identified six main themes that may describe potential meanings behind these findings: (1) knowledge, (2) personal preferences, (3) perceived burden of delirium, (4) perceived complexity, (5) decision-making and (6) culture.
These findings highlight the reported need to further understand the impact and value of early mobilisation as a non-pharmacological intervention for patients diagnosed with delirium in ICU. Evaluation of early mobilisation interventions involving key stakeholders may address these concerns and provide effective implementation strategies.
重症患者的早期活动情况在不同实践中存在差异。本研究旨在确定重症监护病房(ICU)中诊断为谵妄的患者早期活动的障碍和促进因素。
一项混合方法描述性系统评价。检索电子数据库(AMED、BNI、CINAHL Plus、Cochrane图书馆、Medline和EMBASE)至2021年12月22日的出版物。独立评审员使用Covidence系统评价管理软件筛选研究并提取数据。根据障碍和促进因素的频率(n/%)汇总数据。为实现次要目标,对定性研究进行了主题分析。使用GRADE质量评估工具对定量研究进行评估。根据GRADE-CERQual质量评估工具对定性研究进行分析。本研究已在PROSPERO(CRD 42021227655)上进行前瞻性注册。
十项研究符合纳入标准。定量研究结果表明,谵妄的存在是报告中早期活动最常见的障碍。最常见的促进因素是ICU工作人员因早期活动干预而获得积极结果的经验。主题分析确定了六个主要主题,可能描述了这些结果背后的潜在含义:(1)知识,(2)个人偏好,((3)谵妄的感知负担,(4)感知复杂性,(5)决策,(6)文化。
这些发现凸显了有必要进一步了解早期活动作为ICU中诊断为谵妄的患者的非药物干预措施的影响和价值。对涉及关键利益相关者的早期活动干预进行评估可能会解决这些问题,并提供有效的实施策略。