Semprini Jason
University of Iowa College of Public Health; Department of Health Management and Policy.
Soc Sci Q. 2023 Dec;104(7):1329-1342. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13318. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
Recent Medicaid expansions have rekindled the debate around private insurance "crowd-out". Prior research is limited by short-time horizons and state-specific analyses. Our study overcomes these limitations by evaluating twenty years of Medicaid expansions across the entire United States. We obtain data from the U.S. Census Bureau for all U.S. states and D.C. for private insurance coverage rates of adults 18-64, for years 1999-2019. After estimating a naïve, staggered Two-Way Fixed Effects Difference-in-Differences regression model, we implement four novel econometric methods to diagnose and overcome threats of bias from staggered designs. We also test for pre-treatment differential trends and heterogenous effects over time. Our findings suggest that Medicaid expansion was associated with a 1.5%-point decline in private insurance rates (p < 0.001). We also observe significant heterogeneity over time, with estimates peaking four years after expansion. The importance of a 1-2%-point crowd-out, we leave for future research and debate.
近期医疗补助计划的扩张再次引发了围绕私人保险“挤出效应”的争论。先前的研究受限于短期视野和特定州的分析。我们的研究通过评估全美范围内二十年的医疗补助计划扩张克服了这些局限性。我们从美国人口普查局获取了1999年至2019年美国所有州及华盛顿特区18至64岁成年人私人保险覆盖率的数据。在估计了一个简单的、交错的双向固定效应差分回归模型后,我们采用了四种新颖的计量经济学方法来诊断和克服交错设计带来的偏差威胁。我们还检验了治疗前的差异趋势以及随时间变化的异质性效应。我们的研究结果表明,医疗补助计划的扩张与私人保险费率下降1.5个百分点相关(p < 0.001)。我们还观察到随时间变化存在显著的异质性,估计值在扩张四年后达到峰值。关于1至2个百分点挤出效应的重要性,我们留待未来的研究和讨论。