• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将选择融入选择任务:在健康偏好研究中纳入偏好诱导任务。

Putting the Choice in Choice Tasks: Incorporating Preference Elicitation Tasks in Health Preference Research.

作者信息

Whitty Jennifer A, Lancsar Emily, De Abreu Lourenco Richard, Howard Kirsten, Stolk Elly A

机构信息

Patient-Centred Research, Evidera, London, UK.

Norwich Medical School, The University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

Patient. 2024 May 14. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00696-5.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-024-00696-5
PMID:38744798
Abstract

Choice-based preference elicitation methods such as the discrete choice experiment (DCE) present hypothetical choices to respondents, with an expectation that these hypothetical choices accurately reflect a 'real world' health-related decision context and that consequently the choice data can be held to be a true representation of the respondent's health or treatment preferences. For this to be the case, careful consideration needs to be given to the format of the choice task in a choice experiment. The overarching aim of this paper is to highlight important aspects to consider when designing and 'setting up' the choice tasks to be presented to respondents in a DCE. This includes the importance of considering the potential impact of format (e.g. choice context, choice set presentation and size) as well as choice set content (e.g. labelled and unlabelled choice sets and inclusion of reference alternatives) and choice questions (stated choice versus additional questions designed to explore complete preference orders) on the preference estimates that are elicited from studies. We endeavoure to instil a holistic approach to choice task design that considers format alongside content, experimental design and analysis.

摘要

基于选择的偏好诱导方法,如离散选择实验(DCE),会向受访者呈现假设性选择,期望这些假设性选择能准确反映 “现实世界” 中与健康相关的决策情境,从而使选择数据能够被视为受访者健康或治疗偏好的真实体现。要实现这一点,在选择实验中需要仔细考虑选择任务的形式。本文的总体目标是强调在设计和 “构建” 要在DCE中呈现给受访者的选择任务时需要考虑的重要方面。这包括考虑形式(如选择情境、选择集呈现方式和规模)以及选择集内容(如有标签和无标签的选择集以及参考选项的纳入)和选择问题(陈述性选择与旨在探索完整偏好顺序的附加问题)对从研究中得出的偏好估计的潜在影响的重要性。我们努力灌输一种整体的选择任务设计方法,该方法将形式与内容、实验设计和分析一并考虑。

相似文献

1
Putting the Choice in Choice Tasks: Incorporating Preference Elicitation Tasks in Health Preference Research.将选择融入选择任务:在健康偏好研究中纳入偏好诱导任务。
Patient. 2024 May 14. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00696-5.
2
Public preferences for health and non-health outcomes of Universal Basic Income and alternative income-based policies: A mixed-method feasibility study.公众对普遍基本收入和其他基于收入的政策的健康与非健康结果的偏好:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul 30:1-26. doi: 10.3310/ALDS8846.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
5
Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)治疗方案及护理流程中患者和家长偏好的系统评价
Patient. 2015 Dec;8(6):483-97. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0112-5.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Discrete Choice Experiment Versus Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Comparison in Eliciting Young People's Preferences for Web-Based Mental Health Interventions.离散选择实验与最佳-最差标度法:关于激发年轻人对基于网络的心理健康干预措施偏好的实证比较
Patient. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00739-5.
9
The agreement of phonetic transcriptions between paediatric speech and language therapists transcribing a disordered speech sample.儿科言语和语言治疗师转写语音样本的音标转录的一致性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1981-1995. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13043. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
10
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for Mobile App Features to Support People Living With Chronic Heart Diseases: Discrete Choice Study.支持慢性心脏病患者的移动应用功能偏好:离散选择研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Apr 25;13:e58556. doi: 10.2196/58556.
2
Preferences for Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up Care for Children: A Discrete Choice Experiment.儿童神经发育随访护理偏好的离散选择实验
Patient. 2024 Nov;17(6):645-662. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00717-3. Epub 2024 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Pretesting Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Guide for Researchers.预测试离散选择实验:研究人员指南。
Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):109-120. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00672-z. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
2
How can patient preferences be used and communicated in the regulatory evaluation of medicinal products? Findings and recommendations from IMI PREFER and call to action.在药品监管评估中,如何运用并传达患者偏好?来自IMI PREFER的研究结果与建议及行动呼吁
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 16;14:1192770. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1192770. eCollection 2023.
3
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends.
离散选择实验在健康状态估值中的应用:进展与新趋势的系统综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 May;21(3):405-418. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00794-9. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
The Use of a Discrete Choice Experiment Including Both Duration and Dead for the Development of an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Australia.使用包含持续时间和死亡的离散选择实验来开发澳大利亚的 EQ-5D-5L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Apr;41(4):427-438. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01243-0. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
5
Does It Matter How You Ask? Assessing the Impact of Failure or Effectiveness Framing on Preferences for Antibiotic Treatments in a Discrete Choice Experiment.提问方式重要吗?在一项离散选择实验中评估失败或有效性框架对抗生素治疗偏好的影响。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Oct 27;16:2921-2936. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S365624. eCollection 2022.
6
Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?一举两得:如果要超越传统的单一最佳离散选择实验,我们应该使用最佳最差、最佳最佳还是排序法来进行偏好 elicitation?
Health Econ. 2022 Dec;31(12):2630-2647. doi: 10.1002/hec.4599. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
7
Appraising patient preference methods for decision-making in the medical product lifecycle: an empirical comparison.评估医疗产品生命周期决策中患者偏好的方法:实证比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01142-w.
8
Use of Patient Preference Studies in HTA Decision Making: A NICE Perspective.在 HTA 决策中使用患者偏好研究:NICE 的观点。
Patient. 2020 Apr;13(2):145-149. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00408-4.
9
Patient Preferences in the Medical Product Lifecycle.医疗产品生命周期中的患者偏好
Patient. 2020 Feb;13(1):7-10. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00400-y.
10
Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review.探索和引出医疗产品生命周期中患者偏好的方法:文献综述。
Drug Discov Today. 2019 Jul;24(7):1324-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 8.