Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science , Stanford, CA, USA.
W. K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University , Hickory Corners, MI, USA.
J R Soc Interface. 2024 May;21(214):20230604. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0604. Epub 2024 May 15.
Simple models have been used to describe ecological processes for over a century. However, the complexity of ecological systems makes simple models subject to modelling bias due to simplifying assumptions or unaccounted factors, limiting their predictive power. Neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs) have surged as a machine-learning algorithm that preserves the dynamic nature of the data (Chen 2018 ). Although preserving the dynamics in the data is an advantage, the question of how NODEs perform as a forecasting tool of ecological communities is unanswered. Here, we explore this question using simulated time series of competing species in a time-varying environment. We find that NODEs provide more precise forecasts than autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models. We also find that untuned NODEs have a similar forecasting accuracy to untuned long-short term memory neural networks and both are outperformed in accuracy and precision by empirical dynamical modelling . However, we also find NODEs generally outperform all other methods when evaluating with the interval score, which evaluates precision and accuracy in terms of prediction intervals rather than pointwise accuracy. We also discuss ways to improve the forecasting performance of NODEs. The power of a forecasting tool such as NODEs is that it can provide insights into population dynamics and should thus broaden the approaches to studying time series of ecological communities.
简单模型被用于描述生态过程已经有一个多世纪了。然而,由于简化假设或未考虑因素,生态系统的复杂性使得简单模型容易受到建模偏差的影响,从而限制了它们的预测能力。神经微分方程(Neural Ordinary Differential Equations,NODEs)作为一种机器学习算法,因其能够保留数据的动态特性而备受关注(Chen 2018)。尽管保留数据的动态特性是一个优势,但关于 NODEs 作为生态群落预测工具的性能如何的问题仍未得到解答。在这里,我们使用时变环境中竞争物种的模拟时间序列来探讨这个问题。我们发现,NODEs 提供的预测比自回归综合移动平均(Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average,ARIMA)模型更精确。我们还发现,未经调整的 NODEs 与未经调整的长短时记忆神经网络具有相似的预测准确性,并且在准确性和精度方面都不如经验动力模型。然而,我们还发现,在使用区间得分进行评估时,NODEs 通常优于所有其他方法,区间得分根据预测区间而不是点精度来评估精度和准确性。我们还讨论了提高 NODEs 预测性能的方法。像 NODEs 这样的预测工具的强大之处在于它可以提供对种群动态的深入了解,因此应该拓宽研究生态群落时间序列的方法。